TRUMP DERANGEMENT
ON THE RIGHT
©2018 Burt Prelutsky
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

It’s bad enough when the pinheads on the Left demean President Trump and dismiss his accomplishments. After all, mental derangement is the only possible excuse for people to embrace the policies that have consistently failed in the past and have inevitably led to the two evil sides of the same counterfeit coin, Fascism and Communism.    

It’s bad enough that Karl Marx, a complete whackjob, gave birth to a movement that has somehow outlived him by 135 years, but the fact that his followers, people like scumbag-George Soros, commie-Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth dinky-Warren, Teresa May, Justin Trudeau, Raul Castro and Nikolás Maduro, are still taken seriously certainly knocks the theory of evolutionary improvement into a cocked hat. It would be like living in a world in which the Three Stooges were so influential that even decades after their passing, a great many comedians were still sticking their fingers into each other’s eyes and slapping each other silly.

As bad as those people are, I find it even more reprehensible when those attacking President Trump claim to be conservatives.

The other day, I was reading the latest issue of Commentary, a magazine that promotes itself as a counterbalance to the uberliberal New Republic, a place where, intellectually speaking, we few conservative Jews can safely tread.

The first article I read dealt with the importance of accepting loss with grace, using liar-Hillary Clinton as a living example of one’s ignoble fate when a person fails to master that ability. Halfway through the article, I was shocked and dismayed to find the President dragged in where he plainly had no reason to be. In fact, the only time I had a similar reaction was some years ago when I was reading a movie review in the New Yorker and came upon a paragraph devoted to trashing George W. Bush. It wasn’t that I entirely disagreed with what was written, but it was so out of place in a review of a movie having nothing to do with politics that I honestly assumed that a mistake had been made at the printing plant, and that the paragraph had been lifted from a different article.

It was only later, after I’d read a couple of other pieces in the same issue, that I realized that all the New Yorker writers felt obliged to earn their street creds by including an anti-Bush remark in totally inappropriate places.

In any case, I was so offended by the same sort of mischief being duplicated at Commentary that I wrote the following letter to the editor:

“In an otherwise coherent piece, Christine Rosen chose to write ‘This is why calling liar-Hillary’s campaign or Donald Trump’s administration failures which they are quickly delves into partisan mudslinging.’

“Funny, but that’s exactly how I would have described that gratuitous crack. By what metric is Trump’s administration a failure? He has cut taxes; seated one conservative justice on the Supreme Court and is pledging to seat a second, which might even lead to a reversal of the blatantly unconstitutional Roe v. Wade decision; freed us from the Paris Accords; cut us loose from liar-nObama’s treasonous Iran deal; moved our embassy to Jerusalem; possibly persuaded Kim Jong-un to beat his nukes into plowshares; done his best to bring rationality to our immigration policy; helped bring about a surging economy and lower unemployment among every group; re-built the military; gotten rid of job-killing regulations by de-fanging the EPA; and announced to alleged friends and allies that we are done being punked when it comes to trade deals and tariffs.

“I thought these were all things that conservatives have been praying for. The conservatives I know personally feel as if Trump is Santa Claus bringing us every item on our Christmas wish list.

“Could it be that Ms. Rosen and the editors at Commentary are still having a prolonged hissy fit reaction to Trump’s plain speaking and his refusal to stand still and take it while the left-wing members of the media pin a ‘kick me’ sign to the seat of his pants?

“Is it just possible that for all your conservative rhetoric, down deep you secretly yearn for liar-nObama’s pretense of civility? Sincerely, Burt Prelutsky”

⦿  Media insanity reached new heights, at least at Fox News, when David Bossie, during a telephone debate with Joel Payne, suggested that Payne was “out of his cotton-pickin’ mind.”

To which Payne, who must grow weary from schlepping around a 6-foot chip on his shoulder, self-righteously replied: “I had relatives who picked cotton.”

It later turned out that Bossie didn’t know that Payne was black, not that it should have mattered. But once he got the news, he apologized, although nobody should have to apologize for using an old expression that has never had racial connotations.

And yet, Fox saw its politically correct duty and did it by suspending Bossie for two weeks. Perhaps it’s just as well that Fox never gave me a job because I would be strongly tempted to resign rather than to continue working for such a chicken-hearted outfit.

The hierarchy at Fox must be out of their scum-sucking minds. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me in the least to learn that they come from a long line of cotton-pickin’ scum-suckers.

⦿  It shouldn’t have shocked anyone that Mexico just elected a Socialist to be president. In Mexico, as is the case throughout most of Latin America, the same poor, ignorant slobs will always elect someone who promises to give them other people’s money and other people’s land, just the way their fathers and grandfathers did.

We can call it the Robin Hood syndrome -- the belief that if someone has something you want, you’re entitled to have it because you’re such a wonderful person, the proof of which is that you’re poor and, therefore, entitled.

You don’t have to go south of the border to find other examples. Every single time commie-Bernie Sanders, scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters or Elizabeth dinky-Warren, open their mouths, you might think they were running to be the president of Mexico or Honduras or Venezuela, the way they constantly promise their followers free stuff. They call it the redistribution of wealth. By which, these millionaires mean everyone’s wealth but their own.
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

Views: 20

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They all do belong in Jail

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service