TRUMP DERANGEMENT
ON THE RIGHT
©2018 Burt Prelutsky
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

It’s bad enough when the pinheads on the Left demean President Trump and dismiss his accomplishments. After all, mental derangement is the only possible excuse for people to embrace the policies that have consistently failed in the past and have inevitably led to the two evil sides of the same counterfeit coin, Fascism and Communism.    

It’s bad enough that Karl Marx, a complete whackjob, gave birth to a movement that has somehow outlived him by 135 years, but the fact that his followers, people like scumbag-George Soros, commie-Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth dinky-Warren, Teresa May, Justin Trudeau, Raul Castro and Nikolás Maduro, are still taken seriously certainly knocks the theory of evolutionary improvement into a cocked hat. It would be like living in a world in which the Three Stooges were so influential that even decades after their passing, a great many comedians were still sticking their fingers into each other’s eyes and slapping each other silly.

As bad as those people are, I find it even more reprehensible when those attacking President Trump claim to be conservatives.

The other day, I was reading the latest issue of Commentary, a magazine that promotes itself as a counterbalance to the uberliberal New Republic, a place where, intellectually speaking, we few conservative Jews can safely tread.

The first article I read dealt with the importance of accepting loss with grace, using liar-Hillary Clinton as a living example of one’s ignoble fate when a person fails to master that ability. Halfway through the article, I was shocked and dismayed to find the President dragged in where he plainly had no reason to be. In fact, the only time I had a similar reaction was some years ago when I was reading a movie review in the New Yorker and came upon a paragraph devoted to trashing George W. Bush. It wasn’t that I entirely disagreed with what was written, but it was so out of place in a review of a movie having nothing to do with politics that I honestly assumed that a mistake had been made at the printing plant, and that the paragraph had been lifted from a different article.

It was only later, after I’d read a couple of other pieces in the same issue, that I realized that all the New Yorker writers felt obliged to earn their street creds by including an anti-Bush remark in totally inappropriate places.

In any case, I was so offended by the same sort of mischief being duplicated at Commentary that I wrote the following letter to the editor:

“In an otherwise coherent piece, Christine Rosen chose to write ‘This is why calling liar-Hillary’s campaign or Donald Trump’s administration failures which they are quickly delves into partisan mudslinging.’

“Funny, but that’s exactly how I would have described that gratuitous crack. By what metric is Trump’s administration a failure? He has cut taxes; seated one conservative justice on the Supreme Court and is pledging to seat a second, which might even lead to a reversal of the blatantly unconstitutional Roe v. Wade decision; freed us from the Paris Accords; cut us loose from liar-nObama’s treasonous Iran deal; moved our embassy to Jerusalem; possibly persuaded Kim Jong-un to beat his nukes into plowshares; done his best to bring rationality to our immigration policy; helped bring about a surging economy and lower unemployment among every group; re-built the military; gotten rid of job-killing regulations by de-fanging the EPA; and announced to alleged friends and allies that we are done being punked when it comes to trade deals and tariffs.

“I thought these were all things that conservatives have been praying for. The conservatives I know personally feel as if Trump is Santa Claus bringing us every item on our Christmas wish list.

“Could it be that Ms. Rosen and the editors at Commentary are still having a prolonged hissy fit reaction to Trump’s plain speaking and his refusal to stand still and take it while the left-wing members of the media pin a ‘kick me’ sign to the seat of his pants?

“Is it just possible that for all your conservative rhetoric, down deep you secretly yearn for liar-nObama’s pretense of civility? Sincerely, Burt Prelutsky”

⦿  Media insanity reached new heights, at least at Fox News, when David Bossie, during a telephone debate with Joel Payne, suggested that Payne was “out of his cotton-pickin’ mind.”

To which Payne, who must grow weary from schlepping around a 6-foot chip on his shoulder, self-righteously replied: “I had relatives who picked cotton.”

It later turned out that Bossie didn’t know that Payne was black, not that it should have mattered. But once he got the news, he apologized, although nobody should have to apologize for using an old expression that has never had racial connotations.

And yet, Fox saw its politically correct duty and did it by suspending Bossie for two weeks. Perhaps it’s just as well that Fox never gave me a job because I would be strongly tempted to resign rather than to continue working for such a chicken-hearted outfit.

The hierarchy at Fox must be out of their scum-sucking minds. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me in the least to learn that they come from a long line of cotton-pickin’ scum-suckers.

⦿  It shouldn’t have shocked anyone that Mexico just elected a Socialist to be president. In Mexico, as is the case throughout most of Latin America, the same poor, ignorant slobs will always elect someone who promises to give them other people’s money and other people’s land, just the way their fathers and grandfathers did.

We can call it the Robin Hood syndrome -- the belief that if someone has something you want, you’re entitled to have it because you’re such a wonderful person, the proof of which is that you’re poor and, therefore, entitled.

You don’t have to go south of the border to find other examples. Every single time commie-Bernie Sanders, scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters or Elizabeth dinky-Warren, open their mouths, you might think they were running to be the president of Mexico or Honduras or Venezuela, the way they constantly promise their followers free stuff. They call it the redistribution of wealth. By which, these millionaires mean everyone’s wealth but their own.
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

Views: 16

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They all do belong in Jail

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

 Kavanaugh Accuser Donated   To Hillary Clinton  10 Times,  60+ Liberal Groups 

Reportedly attempted to conceal political activity by scrubbing social media accounts

Over the weekend, a name and face were added to the previously anonymous sexual assault allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, which is now threatening to derail his nomination. Those looking to obstruct Kavanaugh’s confirmation certainly saved their best for last, as the prior attempts included pathetic stunts such as:

– Claiming to file perjury charges against Kavanaugh, which only Jeff Sessions would have the ability to file.

– Packing the hearings with hysterical protesters, resulting in hundreds of arrests.

– Threatening female Republicans with extortion.

– Cory Booker comparing himself to Spartacus, the escaped slave who led a revolt against the Romans.

The identity of the accuser was revealed as Christine Blasey Ford, who has agreed testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford reportedly made the allegations back in July in a letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Feinstein waited until it was close to the vote to confirm Kavanaugh before making the accusations public.

There’s a record of Ford making the accusation in a 2012 therapy session, though Kavanaugh isn’t named in the session notes that Ford gave to the press. Ford alleges that in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh entered a room drunk, pinned her to a bed, and groped her over her clothing. Kavanaugh “categorically denied” the allegations.View image on Twitter

Fin Gomez @finnygo   NEW: Statement from Judge Brett Kavanaugh:

There is a slight discrepancy in the account Ford provided in her letter to Feinstein and in her therapist’s notes, but that could simply be due to an error on her therapists part.

There are however some other questions that need to be answered which call into question Ford’s motives.

As Grabien reported, they include:

1. Why Ford deleted her public social media accounts before revealing herself.

Ford deleted all of her public social media before she came forward, making it difficult to see the advocacy and partisanship she was engaged in the time leading up to her making her allegation public. Of course, Ford may simply value her privacy, but the act of deleting her public postings will inevitably make some wonder what she didn’t want seen.

2. That Ford may have an unrelated grudge against Kavanaugh, as his mother, once a circuit court judge, ruled against Ford’s parents.

In August 1996, Christine Blasey Ford’s parents, Paula and Ralph Blasey, were foreclosed upon. Kavanaugh’s mom, Martha, was then serving as a judge on the Montgomery Country Circuit Court, and she ruled against Christine Ford’s parents.

3. That Ford is a Democrat who donates to left-wing causes, attended the anti-Trump March for Science, and previously signed an open letter challenging Trump’s border policy.

Ford is a political activist who has made dozens of donations to left-wing causes. According to OpenSecrets, she has made more than 60 donations to liberal causes, with almost four dozen to the pro-abortion group, Emily’s List, alone. Ford also donated to the DNC, Hillary Clinton (more than 10 times), Bernie Sanders, and the progressive organizing group ActBlue.

Ford likewise attended the anti-Trump March for Science, where she wore a hat knitted like a human brain, but inspired by the feminist “pussy hats” worn at the Women’s Marches. Ford also added her name to an open letter from health professionals who argued the U.S. border policy resulting in temporary separation of some families was harmful to children’s development.

There’s no statute of limitations on sexual assault in Maryland, where she claims that the assault happened. Rather than go to the police, Ford went to Dianne Feinstein. If her accusations are true, she should immediately file a police report against Kavanaugh and take him to trial. If she doesn’t, perhaps that’s because she knows the consequences of filing a false police report.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service