Updated Trump administration ends DACA, with 6-month delay 09/27/2018

The Trump administration on Tuesday announced the “orderly wind down” of the Obama-era program that gave a deportation reprieve to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children – putting pressure on Congress to come up with a legislative alternative.

The Department of Homeland Security formally rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, with a six-month delay for current recipients. According to Acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke, the interval is meant to give Congress “time to deliver on appropriate legislative solutions.”

“However, I want to be clear that no new initial requests or associated applications filed after today will be acted on,” Duke said in a written statement.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, speaking to reporters, blasted the Obama administration's "disrespect for the legislative process" in enacting the 2012 policy. He said the “unilateral executive amnesty” probably would have been blocked by the courts anyway.

“The executive branch, through DACA, deliberately sought to achieve what the legislative branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions,” Sessions said, blaming the policy for the recent “surge” at the border. “Such an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the executive branch.”

A day earlier, Sessions sent Duke a letter with his legal determination that the 2012 executive action was unconstitutional.

The Trump administration was facing a Tuesday deadline to make a decision on DACA or face legal action by Republican state AGs who hoped to force the president’s hand in discontinuing the program.

Administration officials cast their approach Tuesday at the least disruptive option.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump had promised to terminate DACA, though he appeared to soften his stance since taking office. In ending the program with a six-month delay, Trump put the onus on Congress to pass a legislative fix.

According to DHS, no current beneficiaries will be impacted before March 5, 2018.

“Congress, get ready to do your job - DACA!” Trump tweeted Tuesday morning.
daca

daca

In this Aug. 15, 2017, file photo, a woman holds up a signs in support of the Obama administration program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, during an immigration reform rally at the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

While some Republicans support the goals of the DACA program, many opposed the use of executive action to institute it, describing the move as a presidential overreach.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is among those who now supports the call to protect so-called “Dreamers” with legislation.

“I have always believed DACA was a presidential overreach,” he said in a statement. "However, I equally understand the plight of the Dream Act kids who -- for all practical purposes know no country other than America. If President Trump makes this decision we will work to find a legislative solution to their dilemma.”

On a conference call, administration officials said Tuesday they are still prioritizing criminal aliens for deportation. But they described the original DACA criteria as very broad and cited the legal determination of the Justice Department.

During the presidential campaign, Trump referred to DACA as “illegal amnesty.” However, he seemed to edge away from that stance in April when he told the Associated Press that DACA recipients could “rest easy.”

The DACA program was formed through executive action by former President Barack Obama in 2012, allowing recipients to get a deportation reprieve – and work permits – for a two-year period subject to renewal. Under the program, individuals were able to request DACA status if they were under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012, came to the U.S. before turning 16 and have continuously lived in the country since June 15, 2007. Individuals must also have a high school diploma, GED certification, been honorably discharged from the military or still be in school. Recipients cannot have a criminal record.

Congress had been considering legislation to shield young illegal immigrants from deportation for years, dating back to the George W. Bush administration. Lawmakers tried again to pass a bill during the Obama administration, but couldn’t muster the votes amid flagging Republican support before Obama formed the program in 2012.

Nearly 800,000 undocumented youth are currently under the program's umbrella.

On Friday, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said he supported a legislative solution to protect undocumented minors, but also urged the president to reconsider scrapping DACA.

"I actually don't think he should do that and I believe that this is something that Congress has to fix," Ryan said on radio station WCLO.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/05/trump-administration-end...

Views: 2912

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Caught: GOP Traitor Sneaks Through Amnesty Bill Letting Anyone into the US

If I've said it once, I've said it a million times. The GOP truly thinks they can get away with pushing amnesty through because they don't believe you're paying attention.

The major amnesty bills were just the beginning. Conservatives like you raised your voices and forced the Republicans to vote down all of the amnesty bills that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell brought to a vote.
The establishment knows they can't win in the light of day, so now they're pushing amnesty in the shadows.

As you know, Congress is in the middle of what is known as Appropriations Season. This is when committees and sub-committees decide what will be in the spending bills that come to the floor in September.

Yesterday, while debating the Homeland Security spending bill, the Democrats introduced an amendment. They wanted to expand the United States' asylum policies to help more migrants get into the country.
Currently, in order to get asylum at the Southern Border, a migrant has to prove that they are being specifically targeted in their home country, usually as a means of political or religious persecution. The Democrat amendment -- written by Rep. David Price (D-NC) -- would expand this to also grant asylum for victims of gang violence and domestic abuse.

This would open the border wide up. Instead of only granting asylum to people who are being persecuted for their faiths or political beliefs, the Democrat plan would give amnesty to any migrant who claims their spouse beats them. No proof or evidence required.

If this bill passes, every single illegal alien and migrant would have a path to be able to stay in the US!
Don't let the establishment get away with this! Tell Congress right now that you will remove anyone who allows this insane amnesty provision to be passed into law!

I have tremendous sympathy for real victims of domestic violence. But that doesn't qualify someone for entry into the United States and this plan is so broad, there is no telling how many illegal aliens would try to abuse it.

Already, migrants are showing up to the US border with scripts telling them how to game the system. If this new Democrat plan, all someone would have to do is tell Border Patrol that their husband/wife hit them, and they'd be welcomed in.

Want to know what is even more pathetic? A Republican committee just approved this resolution! That's right, unless we rise up and stop it, this Democrat amendment will be included in the next spending bill.
The House Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee held the vote. Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS) -- shown above -- chairs the subcommittee and allowed the Democrat amendment to receive a vote. But instead of actually counting the yeas and nays, Yoder held a voice vote.

This is important. Under a voice vote, the committee members basically shout out their votes. It is then up to the chair to decide which side has more support, based upon nothing but listening to Congressmen yelling "yea" and "nay." In a voice vote, there are no recorded vote tallies. Republicans often use this tactic to pass liberal bills out of committee without forcing GOPers to have to go on the record. It's nothing but cowardice. ( It is more than cowardice... it is deciet for the American Citizens and taxpayers who must pony up to support the invaiding hordes of illegal migrants entering the US without any screening, medical or criminal... it is treason as we are under attack by the Communist International who see America as responsible for the poverty in the world.. added not part of the article..)

We have no idea which Republicans in the subcommittee voted for this monstrosity, but Yoder felt that the votes were there, so he passed it through.

This plan would open up the floodgates to make it even easier for illegal aliens and migrants to enter the US, and the GOP didn't even record the vote.They think they can get away with this. They think they can vote to open up the illegal immigration flood gates without consequence.


You MUST prove them wrong! Send your instant message to Congress and threaten to remove any Congressman or Senator who allows this insane asylum amendment to pass!  Luckily, this is still in the subcommittee level. The next step will be a hearing in the full House Appropriations Committee, and then onto the House floor for a full vote. We are already hearing that Democrats are going to be pushing a similar amendment in the Senate.

If this passes, the country will be lost. There would be no need for illegal immigration. Migrants would just be able to show up at the border and claim spousal abuse or that there was a gang in their neighborhood. That's all they would need to say to be allowed into the US.

I warned you that the GOP was working on a behind the scenes amnesty surrender. This is it.
It is not to late to stop this, but we need to act right now!

Kill this amnesty plan before it is too late! Tell Congress right now that you will remove anyone who allows this insane amnesty provision to be passed into law!
It's time to fight,

Joe Otto
Conservative Daily

All of the above extracted from Conservative Daily @ https://conservative-daily.com/ 

FOR ADDITIONAL SOURCE SEE: https://www.numbersusa.com/blog/reps-frelinghuysen-yoder-undermine-...

Thanks for posting Col!

This is an ongoing serious problem that the President must address... he must inform the GOP leadership that ANY BILL... appropriations or otherwise... will be vetoed if it shows up in the White House looking for his signature with any form of Amnesty for Illegal Aliens.  

We are at WAR for the very soul of our Nation and we must identify and remove every traitor in Congress who supports a New World Order... open borders, universal citizenship and one world government... Regardless of their stated Party affiliation. 

It is time to remove the deceitful miscreants... fronting as Republicans.  Those who are attempting to strip us of our sovereignty and wealth; whose intention it is to support the poor and indigent of the world using US assets must be identified and removed from office. These individuals intend on taking from each according to their ability and giving to each according to their need... Why work?  Why save pr build wealth? Why do anything, as the communist will simply take your hard earned increase and give it to those who will not work.  

The Communist International and various other SOCIALIST GROUPS are behind the movement to destroy America and we must treat those who support such garbage as the TRAITORS they are...  The Communist movement did not die with the Soviet Union it is alive and well ... in Washington, DC.

Mr. President, please act to defend our borders... put the US Military on the border to apprehend and immediately deport all those entering illegally... and keep them there until the border can be properly secured with a wall and the appropriate numbers of Border Patrol and INS agents.

Court Rules Trump Anti-Sancyuary Policy Unconstitutional

A federal appeals court ruled President Trump’s executive order punishing sanctuary cities by withholding money is unconstitutional — but in a twist, the court cleared the way for the government to carry out the policy in much of the country.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Mr. Trump tried to steal Congress’s powers when his administration added new conditions to Justice Department grants by requiring cities and counties to cooperate with immigration authorities.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/1/us-appeals-court-tr...

Courts are NOT supposed to RULE. 

THEY WRITE OPINIONS, THAT's IT!!

IMPEACH EVERY ONE OF THEM.

Sessions rips federal judge for 'improperly' reinstating DACA, 'eviscerating' executive power

Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday unloaded on a federal judge who ordered the administration to reinstate the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy last week, saying the ruling was "improper" and vowing to keep up enforcement efforts against illegal immigration "aggressively."

Sessions added that the judge had effectively "eviscerated" the legal authority of the executive branch and Congress, and strongly suggested the administration would appeal the ruling.

The Trump administration announced last year it would end DACA, which was implemented by the Obama administration using executive authority and protects illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation. However, the Republican-controlled Congress has failed to agree to a permanent statutory replacement for the program, despite several legislative attempts.

Federal judges have since barred the administration from ending the program entirely, saying it would be acceptable only to shut down future enrollment in DACA because existing applicants had already relied on it. But the ruling by U.S. District Judge John Bates went a step further by ordering authorities to essentially reinstate DACA in full.

In a statement, Sessions decried Bates' ruling as one of a "number of decisions in which courts have improperly used judicial power to steer, enjoin, modify, and direct executive policy."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/06/sessions-rips-federal-ju...

Sessions needs to shut up and DO IT. talk later. 

Opps,

Looks like Sessions is caught between the rock and hard place.

TRUMP...:)

I would have thrown him out the door at least 6 months ago.

Ditto  Jea9 .... he should have been fired the day he RECUSED himself from supervising the Special Counsel... he is no supporter of the Conservative cause or President Trumps policies... Like most RINO's he feigns support for our core values but when the rubber meets the road he changes directions... and supports liberal dogma.

No, Sessions is totally compromised and corrupted... he is part of the ESTABLISHMENT and has no intention of doing EVERYTHING possible to enforce our current immigration laws...

Sessions is coalescing with the Courts, (throwing trump and the people under the bus) instead of challenging the courts constitutional authority to order any action by the Administration stopped or amended... Rule by judicial fiat is much easier than passing laws thru Congress...

Progressives and their communist allies have worked for years to advance the idea that the courts can use its powers to rule by judicial fiat... Who needs elected officials when you have lifetime appointed judges in your pocket?

The Constitutional recourse for a President who violates the law by improperly enforcing the law is not a lawsuit... it is IMPEACHMENT.

AG Sessions rhetoric is worthless... the facts are that our current immigration law is not being enforced... his words are empty, meant to placate an outraged Nation.  What needs to be done is for the Judge to be IMPEACHED... removed from office by Congress. The President needs to address the nation regarding such Un-Constitutional court orders.  President Jackson once told a federal judge that his orders would not be enforced... that his orders stopped at the courthouse steps. 

It is time for our President to do the same... when it comes to openly unconstitutional orders from any court. It is also time for the President to inform Congress that no NEW IMMIGRATION LAWS ARE NECESSARY ... that he will enforce the current STATUTORY LAW as intended and written... not as unlawfully amended by former administrations. 

The CURRENT LAW is sufficient if enforced... any new law would undoubtedly enact provisions that are currently unlawful... amnesty and other terms that are unwanted and contrary to our national security interests. 

No law is adequate without enforcement... Our current immigration and naturalization laws are being ignored and subverted by the illegal actions of former administrations and/or the use of judicial fiat... Our current immigration and naturalization system is being operated under the color of law.

The President needs to chide Congress for failing to IMPEACH Judges who operate under the color of law... too, rule by judicial fiat.  Congress should create a standing JUDICIARY REVIEW COMMITTEE with the power to recommend removal of any federal judge including US Supreme Court Justices if they abuse their offices and powers.  That Committee should be a standing committee meeting regularly to hear complaints from the Administration, private citizens, and activist groups...

Judges must be held accountable to the law and the will of Congress and the people... they are not supreme and don't make the laws they are to administer justice ... not legislate new law out of whole cloth... or by judicial fiat.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service