Updated Trump administration ends DACA, with 6-month delay 07/10/2018

The Trump administration on Tuesday announced the “orderly wind down” of the Obama-era program that gave a deportation reprieve to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children – putting pressure on Congress to come up with a legislative alternative.

The Department of Homeland Security formally rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, with a six-month delay for current recipients. According to Acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke, the interval is meant to give Congress “time to deliver on appropriate legislative solutions.”

“However, I want to be clear that no new initial requests or associated applications filed after today will be acted on,” Duke said in a written statement.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, speaking to reporters, blasted the Obama administration's "disrespect for the legislative process" in enacting the 2012 policy. He said the “unilateral executive amnesty” probably would have been blocked by the courts anyway.

“The executive branch, through DACA, deliberately sought to achieve what the legislative branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple occasions,” Sessions said, blaming the policy for the recent “surge” at the border. “Such an open-ended circumvention of immigration laws was an unconstitutional exercise of authority by the executive branch.”

A day earlier, Sessions sent Duke a letter with his legal determination that the 2012 executive action was unconstitutional.

The Trump administration was facing a Tuesday deadline to make a decision on DACA or face legal action by Republican state AGs who hoped to force the president’s hand in discontinuing the program.

Administration officials cast their approach Tuesday at the least disruptive option.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump had promised to terminate DACA, though he appeared to soften his stance since taking office. In ending the program with a six-month delay, Trump put the onus on Congress to pass a legislative fix.

According to DHS, no current beneficiaries will be impacted before March 5, 2018.

“Congress, get ready to do your job - DACA!” Trump tweeted Tuesday morning.
daca

daca

In this Aug. 15, 2017, file photo, a woman holds up a signs in support of the Obama administration program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, during an immigration reform rally at the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

While some Republicans support the goals of the DACA program, many opposed the use of executive action to institute it, describing the move as a presidential overreach.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is among those who now supports the call to protect so-called “Dreamers” with legislation.

“I have always believed DACA was a presidential overreach,” he said in a statement. "However, I equally understand the plight of the Dream Act kids who -- for all practical purposes know no country other than America. If President Trump makes this decision we will work to find a legislative solution to their dilemma.”

On a conference call, administration officials said Tuesday they are still prioritizing criminal aliens for deportation. But they described the original DACA criteria as very broad and cited the legal determination of the Justice Department.

During the presidential campaign, Trump referred to DACA as “illegal amnesty.” However, he seemed to edge away from that stance in April when he told the Associated Press that DACA recipients could “rest easy.”

The DACA program was formed through executive action by former President Barack Obama in 2012, allowing recipients to get a deportation reprieve – and work permits – for a two-year period subject to renewal. Under the program, individuals were able to request DACA status if they were under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012, came to the U.S. before turning 16 and have continuously lived in the country since June 15, 2007. Individuals must also have a high school diploma, GED certification, been honorably discharged from the military or still be in school. Recipients cannot have a criminal record.

Congress had been considering legislation to shield young illegal immigrants from deportation for years, dating back to the George W. Bush administration. Lawmakers tried again to pass a bill during the Obama administration, but couldn’t muster the votes amid flagging Republican support before Obama formed the program in 2012.

Nearly 800,000 undocumented youth are currently under the program's umbrella.

On Friday, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said he supported a legislative solution to protect undocumented minors, but also urged the president to reconsider scrapping DACA.

"I actually don't think he should do that and I believe that this is something that Congress has to fix," Ryan said on radio station WCLO.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/05/trump-administration-end...

Views: 2630

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The individuals who complied this HIT PIECE... on the Boy Scouts of America failed to do their due diligence... too,read their supporting documents... These documents prove that the Boy Scouts were vetting their Scout Masters and when a rotten apple was discovered they acted to permanently bar them from scouting and pursued prosecution with the local authorities... just the opposite of this hit pieces premise. 


See: https://crewjanci.com/files/0001.pdf   This pdf record clearly shows that the Boy Scouts discharged pedophiles... these files, show the Boy Scouts discharged bad apples from their service and placed them on a permanent list... barring them from service with the Boy Scouts. These pdf files are not a record of the Boy Scouts attempting to cover for Pedophiles... It's just the opposite.


The first record  in the documents provide is found at 0001.pdf file... it clearly shows the Boy Scouts were maintaining records on those individuals ID as Pedophiles, in order, to permanently bar them from scouting.  It also shows they not only discharged these pedophiles they also followed with prosecution of such individuals. The particular Scout Master recorded in this file had the records of his offenses turned over the US Navy for prosecution ... as he was a member of the Navy, and the offenses occurred under Naval jurisdiction.

Those individuals responsible for these spurious attack on the honor of the Boy Scouts of America are despicable... reckless Buffoons, who obviously haven't a clue on how to do research or read. The Boy Scouts of America kept CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS of pedophiles and other unsuitables, in order to ensure these individuals never gained access to the Scouts... However, like any major organization, with tens of thousands of scouts and leaders, some rotten apples made it thru their careful screening process ... but when discovered ... these individuals were promptly removed and prosecuted where the law would take action...

It should be noted that our legal system is holding the Boy Scouts hostage to political correctness... the Courts have required the Scouts to ignore the sexual proclivities of gays, transgenders, and other deviants, mandating they be permitted to be Scout Masters and associates. If one wants to direct their anger, for the abuses suffered by scouts, ensure that anger is directed toward the proper individuals and organizations: Gay rights groups, the ACLU, and our Courts... especially, the Courts as they have told the Boy Scouts they must admit Gays, transgenders, even Girls into scouting.., as Scout Masters and members...Thank a judge for this mess.

So are you Mr. Nelson, surrounded by deception ... advisors who are members of the Establishment and DEEP STATE, of the British Empire.

"Those who think Magana Carta is connected to DACA are hallucinating... Just what is the connection to a 800 year old charter of rights granted by the King of England to his vassal Barons?"

 TAKE IT UP WITH THEM- Mr. Nelson, you know the Left, the Democrat Party.

Now Hurry along, we don't want you to miss the boat.

The individuals who complied this HIT PIECE... on the Boy Scouts of America failed, I heard you was in the Boy Scouts of America, thats right, you stated that, and the CFR is a Nice bunch of Guys,

Did they , complied this HIT PIECE with you, its ok man, I read on the internet it was ok to be Gay.

I find it hard to get a political punt posted, so lets try again. Now Mr. Nelson, you was in the Boy Scouts of America, I read on the internet, man, they said it ok, to be gay, I still consider CFR a bounce of child molesting animals.

TAKE IT UP WITH THEM- Mr. Nelson, you know the Left, the Democrat Party. I do not trust CFR, but seeing how you do, its kind of like this, its a Blivet, a Blivet Political Punt of 10 Pounds Of Shit In A 5 Pound Bag, and that is what the CFR DNC is.

Now Hurry along, we don't want you to miss the boat. I would love to see you take the Magna Carta up with the Left.

The individuals who complied this HIT PIECE... on the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) failed to do their due diligence... too,read their supporting documents... These documents prove that the Boy Scouts were vetting their Scout Masters and when a rotten apple was discovered they acted to permanently bar them from scouting and pursued prosecution with the local authorities... just the opposite of this hit pieces premise.

The historical position of the Boy Scouts of America hardly supported gay rights... the ACLU and the Courts have been used to force Scouts to accept gays and other deviants as members of Scouting... many of the BSA troops have since left the federally chartered BSA and reorganized as individual scout troops to avoid the ACLU and leftist judiciary's mandates to accept gays... and girls in their Troops.  Those individuals disparaging the BSA have no historical perspective for what has occurred.

See: https://crewjanci.com/files/0001.pdf This pdf record clearly shows that the Boy Scouts discharged pedophiles... these files, show the Boy Scouts barred such deviants access to scouting... barring them from service with the Boy Scouts. These pdf files are not a record of the Boy Scouts attempting to cover for Pedophiles... It's just the opposite.

The first record in the documents provide noted as  a pdf file 0001... clearly shows the Boy Scouts were maintaining records for those individuals ID as Pedophiles, in order, to permanently bar them from scouting. It also shows they not only discharged these pedophiles, they also followed up with prosecution of such individuals. The particular Scout Masters recorded in this pdf file was discharged from scouting and his offenses turned over the US Navy for prosecution ... as he was a member of the Navy, and the offenses occurred under Naval jurisdiction.


Those individuals responsible for these spurious attack on the honor of the Boy Scouts of America are despicable... reckless Buffoons, who obviously haven't a clue on how to do research or read. The Boy Scouts of America kept CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS of pedophiles and other unsuitables, in order to ensure these individuals never gained access to the Scouts... However, like any major organization, with tens of thousands of scouts and leaders, some rotten apples made it thru their careful screening process ... but when discovered ... these individuals were promptly removed and prosecuted where the law would take action...


It should be noted that our legal system is holding the Boy Scouts hostage to political correctness... the Courts have required the Scouts to ignore the sexual proclivities of gays, transgenders, and other deviants, mandating they be permitted to be Scout Masters and associates. If one wants to direct their anger, for the abuses suffered by scouts, ensure that anger is directed toward the proper individuals and organizations: Gay rights groups, the ACLU, and our Courts... especially, the Courts as they have told the Boy Scouts they must admit Gays, transgenders, even Girls into scouting.., as Scout Masters and members...Thank a judge for this mess.

Facts not innuendo or personal attacks make for rational debate... disparaging the honor and life of others the tools of those without honor or an effective argument.  The Boy Scouts have been disparaged and attacked by the left and their Dupes for Decades... until they are but a shell of their past... This Group needs to be encouraged not disparaged... but weaker men often resort to debased and coarse arguments... when they have no real basis for their bias and hate.

 I am very pleased Mr. Nelson, you have a issue with that information, it makes my day man.

 Seeing how most in Congress like for boys to see their other gender, damn man, thats what all most 1/2 of the seats in Congress, that is CFR Members.

  A seat full of trash, to govern DACA, damn man ...nice touch. So get your Magna Carta On man, lets DACA,do the DACA protest...post Constitutional Laws as if they give a shit what you state.

 Yea Man, DACA Magna Carta, Love the Fagot Ass Obama, he is just like Slick Willy, and Queer Bait Hillary Clinton.

 And these people consider use a Goy, right, hell ya, right on man.

Here a hope for the tomorrow, boys in pink, nice touch. I have to go, so have a pleasant DACA protest here.

LMAO...............

LMAO Man.......

Boy Scouts of America's 'Internal Investigation'

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/boy-scouts-of-america-s-in...

Hank ... 

How about posting in English... Please translate the JIVE you posted for those of us who speak English.

We all know what MS-13 is, "an animal group". We all know they are a GANG.

We know that ALL MS-13 are all savage, criminals and should by all rights be locked up in solitary BUT then we would need to take care of them. Since they are here illegally they should be removed LEGALLY , put on a plane taken to dense jungles of central or south America and dropped off with a bottle of Arrowhead a two granola bars. That's the humane thing instead of the FIRING SQUAD THEY DESERVE!

The DOJ should be searching these criminals out and ANY OTHER GANGS WHO ARE HARBORING OR PROTECTING THEM WEATHER THEY BE GANGS OR SANCTUARY ROOTING DEMOCRAR'S doing this----those protecting MS13 should be tried for harboring criminals!

CAN WE PLEASE HAVE A PIECE-A HEADLINING STORY ABOUT THE 4 PAGE MEMO. DACA WILL BE IN THE NEWS for a long time BUT NOBODY"S DONE ANY KIND OF STORY ABOUT THE MEMO AND....... ITS BIG PEOPLE!

I BELIEVE OBAMA IS TIGHTLY INVOLVED IN THE FISA LIE SO THE DNC COULD SPY ON TRUMP. There is an orchestrater and it has the FEEL OF OBAMA ALL OVER IT! DNC wanted in the worst way to trap Trump to get rid of him.....NOW GO GET HILLARY AND ALL THE OTHERS EVEN THAT SLIMY MUELLER!

I think Obama is concerned and I also believe the DEMO party will lie cheat and what ever is needed to PROTECT THAT LYING POS Barrack!

Don't expect the left stream media to conduct any in-depth reporting... of the criminal conduct reported in this memo...

Pres. Trump will need to fire a whole host of individuals in the DOJ and FBI over this... don't expect the career FBI agents or DOJ attorneys to properly act on the evidence of criminal conduct in this memo... or to request indictments from a Federal Grand Jury on this matter. Prosecuting those individuals Identified as breaking the law in this memo won't be done voluntarily... The Deep State is not going to volunteer to eat their own... unlike many conservative politician's regularly do.

Don't look for Special Counsel Mueller to resign or declare his investigation closed... look for him to double down on fallacious indictments and leaks about possible criminal conduct for unnamed members of Trumps Administration.  The Left will not give up voluntarily on their efforts to find a means to Impeach Pres. Trump.

Pres. Trump will have to personally manage the follow up prosecution... of the criminals identified and reported in this memo... using the White House staff/legal counsel. Holding the criminal elements in this memo accountable won't happen if it is left up to the DEEP STATE operatives... in the DOJ and FBI.  It is time to DRAIN THE SWAMP Mr. President.

CAN WE PLEASE HAVE A PIECE-A HEADLINING STORY ABOUT THE 4 PAGE MEMO. DACA WILL BE IN THE NEWS for a long time BUT NOBODY"S DONE ANY KIND OF STORY ABOUT THE MEMO AND....... ITS BIG PEOPLE!

I BELIEVE OBAMA IS TIGHTLY INVOLVED IN THE FISA LIE SO THE DNC COULD SPY ON TRUMP. There is an orchestrater and it has the FEEL OF OBAMA ALL OVER IT! DNC wanted in the worst way to trap Trump to get rid of him.....NOW GO GET HILLARY AND ALL THE OTHERS EVEN THAT SLIMY MUELLER!

I think Obama is concerned and I also believe the DEMO party will lie cheat and what ever is needed to PROTECT THAT LYING POS OBAMA

Stephen Kazmer

Only a war, may over turn this, it is their choice, and if they kill President Trump, Bad News For the Bear.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service