TREATY OF PEACE 2020: What every U.S. Citizen Needs to Know and Respond to Asap

 On August 19th of 2019 the preceding award certification was granted by the SITCOMM Arbitration Association in the case that is delineated below the title: Treaty of Peace 2020.

 This type of Arbitration Award appears to be unprecedented in its scope and magnitude and effect. It can potentially affect every U.S. citizen as well as profoundly affect the future of the American Republic. The far-reaching ramifications associated with this momentous award will greatly impact every patriot who decides to opt in to this unique opportunity.

 The back story to this whole process is quite fascinating and the history is well worth understanding. As follows:

For a detailed description of the Arbitration Award and what it means for those who opt in, please consult the documents below. What follows is a summary of the “Bill for Settlement of the Award”:

– There is to be an opt-in process for the beneficiaries designed to be simple and rapid.

– There is to be an unconditional release and setting at Liberty of the beneficiaries.

– Beneficiaries, are as defined in the bill, all Americans that opt-in and includes their immediate family (minors). For married couples, both adults need to opt-in which then includes their children.

– Any case past or present is void.

– Beneficiaries are to receive immediate and unconditional indemnification.

– Beneficiaries are to receive immediate and unconditional immunity.

– There is immediate issuance of necessary documentation of the indemnification and the immunity for the beneficiary.

– A return of all property and assets.

– All records and systems of records, other than the provided Diplomatic status, are to be expunged and destroyed.

– A land patent will be issued, titled in fee simple absolute and possession (the highest form obtainable). It allows you to leave it to your heirs and under a land patent it is free and clear from government obstruction. It must be issued from the Land Patent Office, not from the Bureau of Land Management.

– An accounting and return of any and all accounts, of any nature, shape, cause, form, format and kind held or managed by any entity and emanating from the beneficiary.

read more:

Views: 73

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So sad no one from the Tea Party understands what this can do and has done for so many.

Especially considering the problems the Tea Party has had with the IRS as a chief NGO with their partner Federal Reserve as another NGO. You can make them stay out of your business - all of it. That alone with no more property taxes is one hell of a raise.

So sad is the lack of comprehension by the Tea Party and their fans.

We are worldwide thanks to SOTN and their 2 partners. President Trump and AG Barr are well aware of our efforts. Our green light was when he told the world at the UN meeting We are sovereign, We rule.

 No one over looked this blog, Tif was waiting on you, and asked everyone to wait.

 Define the mission statement for this, blog. In easy concepts.

 No one is going to support anything as well as Convention of States, all they can say is Amend the Constitution, and not say restore the Constitution.

 Look man, I read this, it all looks good on paper, and loopholes are never seen until its to late.

Here ya go, Richard, this is one of them blogs...:)

 I find the whole title misleading,  TREATY OF PEACE 2020, to whom by what? Every time there is a treaty someone gets the shaft.

This is so much BS.... first, the certificate provided is not a Government awarded or provided authority to engage in arbitration to settle CIVIL Cases... Arbitration must be agreed to by the parties involved and the arbiter they select can be anyone of their choosing.  There is no government licensing required by federal law... at least not to my knowledge.

The official LOOKING certificate is crap... originated by a private corporation and issued by its director .. it is a self-serving document without any legal standing in a court of law... no court or government agency issued the certificate and no law provides it with any lawful standing... other than contract law...assuming one enters a contract with sitcomm.

Criminal law is not subject to arbitration... albeit PLEA BARGAINING is a similar process.

Hmmm, I think I will dig into this.

 Anything that will undo the Rothschild Banking I am all for it. Here ya go Richard, some old files.


1- Magna Carta

2- Magna Carta Federal Reserve Banking Act
3- Magna Carta Policy Makers
4- Magna Carta Law Writers- USSC code connected to the United Kingdoms World Court
5- Magna Carta Treaties 1200 to 2017
6- Declaration Of Independence (Magna Carta)
7- United States Constitution (Magna Carta)
8- NATO- ( Magna Carta North American Trade Agreement
9- United Nations Charter 1945 The great charter of Magna Carta
10-  Common Core Act 1945 also know as Common Core Magna Carta

 The Great Magna Charter :

 Bruges Group Magna Carta:

Magna Carta of the US Bill of Rights:

Together, these three British documents, Magna Carta, Petition of Right, and the English Bill of Rights, contained the basic tenets of limited government that would come to influence the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Magna Carta US Constitutional Law:
It is this American Bill of Rights, forming an important element in constitutional law, as distinct from constitutional institutions, which chiefly links the American Constitutions of to-day with the Magna Carta of 1215.

The Great Magna Charter :

Magna Carta Taxation :

Magna Carta and NAFTA,:

Magna Carta For Islam:

Charter Act- 2016:

Animus in Consulendo:

Animus in consulendo liber (Latin: "A mind unfettered in deliberation") is the official motto of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), originating from The Conspiracy of Catiline (52, 21) by Roman historian Sallust where it was translated by Charles Anthon as "a mind unfettered in deliberation".

Magna Carta Banking 2017:

Illuminati Magna Carta:

Magna Carta of NATO:

North American Free Trade Agreement:

North American Free Trade Agreement- NATO:

NAOC / NAFTA: New and Unimproved

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s visit to Washington has let Canadian trade experts rest a little easier. After weeks of uncertainty about American intentions toward the tripartite North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), US President Donald Trump stated that he expected to see only “tweaking” to the US trade relationship with Canada. The President hinted that he still had scores to settle with Mexico, but at least one point is clear: NAFTA is in for some changes. What is less clear is whether those changes will make it any better.

NAFTA is showing its age. Though hailed as a new kind of trade agreement at its signature in 1994, the accord got off to a rocky start. It was a pre-digital arrangement made at the beginning of the internet age, and it had the misfortune to arrive just before the 1994-95 peso crisis and the financial malaise that spilled out of Asia in 1996-97. Negotiations hadn’t even been concluded by the time NAFTA got its first revision, as the three signatories added ‘side agreements’ to address concerns about movement of labour and environmental regulation.

The treaty has delivered on some of its intended goals. Cross-border trade between the “three amigos” has more than tripled, and foreign direct investment is on the rise. Still, after twenty-three years the parties to the world’s largest trade agreement have their complaints. To its American critics, NAFTA contributes to the offshore movement of manufacturing jobs and exacerbates inequality; its opponents in Canada claim that it undermines competitiveness and it threatens the country’s resources; and in Mexico the agreement is blamed for under-delivering on job creation and over-delivering on unequal growth. NAFTA’s Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, once seen as innovative ways to defend private companies from overbearing states, are now condemned as naïve concessions to corporate power. By allowing private firms to sue governments that threaten profits, the argument goes, ISDS gives corporations a stick to beat governments that act in the public interest.

Magna Carta Of NAOC:


NAOC 2015:

NAOC technology:

What a hodgepodge of incoherent and misaligned conclusions... I have never seen a more disjointed and scatterbrained concoction of idiotic conspiracy theory and just plain old crap in my lifetime...  Reading this stuff is a total waste of time.

 You have had one blog that about 7 or 8 people gave a thumbs up to, try to find another and lets us decide what is a waste of time.

My blogs stand on their own merit... the garbage being offered by the Danites is not only anti-American it is neo-nazi and anti-Israel.   

Your blogs stand on their own merit, poor Ronald, all ways taken a whooping...:)

Anti Israel spoken like a true globalist...:)  Hey, it was be us that destroys Israel now will it???????????

So, now you suddenly support Israel... what happened to they are all fags and gays or... Khazars... looking to offer up our children to Moloch their god ... or their illegal annexation of Palestine... a non-existent nation.

You could at least be consistent in your hate for all things Jewish and your Neo-Nazi rhetoric... but and alas the unstable and confused are never consistent in their views. 




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service