The White House Lied: Secret Service was never asked to prepare for an Obama trip to Paris

When the members of Barack Obama’s administration say that concerns for the president’s safety at the historic march in Paris on Sunday prevented him from traveling to France, and they say this often, they are really only guessing. More accurately, they should say that they believe security concerns would have prevented Obama from traveling to Paris if they had bothered to investigate the prospect of providing him with a security detail for that trip. According to the Secret Service, the agency was never even asked to consider the precautions necessary to get the President of the United States to France.

“The White House cited security concerns and the fact that the rally came together quickly, in about 36 hours. Earnest said presidential or vice presidential security for events such as the march are ‘onerous’ and have a ‘significant impact’ on those who attend,” The Washington Post reported. “A Secret Service official said the agency was not asked or notified about a potential trip to Paris.”

“Officials acknowledge that the Secret Service could have pulled it off,” reported CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta on Monday. “The agency was not asked or notified about a trip. It would have been a challenge, but he did not say it was impossible.”

It increasingly seems as though the backlash against the president’s decision to skip the march is taking on a life of its own. Presidents often miss events, and many of them are historic in nature. So why is this one capturing the imaginations of the public and the press so completely? They say that the most damaging stumble for a politician is that which accentuates an already widely acknowledged character flaw. It could be that Obama’s aloof, professorial nature has been emphasized to the point of near caricature by his decision to pass on an appearance in France.

read more:

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/01/13/secret-service-was-never-aske...

Views: 583

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

He's such an IDIOT! HE IS AN ISLAMIST RADICAL TERRORIST! ANTI-CHRIST!!

WELL, WADDAYA EXPECT FROM "BARACK INSANE OBASTARD" !!!!....HE'S A RADICAL MUSLIM HIMSELF !!!!!!....AND SUPPORTS HIS MUSLIM BROTHERS ALL OVER THE WORLD !!!!!!........F***ING POS !!!!

Maybe the One (and only) Rock Star liberal's messiah gets more death threats than all the world's leaders combined!  Maybe he feared for his (miserable & worthless) life.  Maybe he didn't give a shit and wanted to watch the football game.  

I'm going with the last one.  It's hard to believe that his handlers were OK with that. He could have made world history! He would have been in the front of the line .. in the middle ... acting concerned. He could have made speeches about what dirty racists we are.  He could have apologized for us. He could have preached NWO.  So many possibilities there.  

My hope is that his handlers are very very pissed off at him... silly him to believe all the hype they created about him!  

I'm SO sick of him and his B.S. 

Just another lie.

If he wasn't such a candy azz and was a good leader of our country he probably wouldn't have to worry quite so much about security. But even still he should have been there. And as Holder was in the vicinity he should have been there too. 

THAT is why 4 of them quit. Yesterday.

They should not have quit. Being on the inside would have gave them more leverage.....now....the administration will be sure to replace these positions with people who are sympathetic to Obama.....probably more Muslims.

Because the truth came out several of the SS bosses got canned.

Zero surprised. Why would a radical islamist  go protest against radical islamists.

Should change that title to:   "The White House Lied AGAIN".

The blkhouse is nothing but ONE BIG MORBID LIE< ever word spoken , written is nwo bent!!!

Time to rid our USA of these evil entities:

http://www.conventionofstates.com/          

http://www.cosaction.com/

Do it NOW !!!   

HE DIDNT GO TO PARIS BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM THROUGH AND THROUGH . THAT WAS HIS MESSAGE TO ISLAM , NOT TO PARIS .

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service