The US Constitution is made for a Moral and Religious People... it is wholly inadequate to govern any other

“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” — John Adams.

Our founding fathers were devout Christians, the precepts and hallmarks of our Constitutional Republic reflect our Christian values and standards... if you want to be an atheist, agnostic, or hedonist you must understand that our government was established on Judeo/Christian precepts and can not function properly without them.

Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation that “[l]iberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith" was noted as the corner stone of America's greatness by Tocqueville... and that which separated us from the fallen governments of Europe. For, hundreds of years, the Natural Law and morality formed the foundation for our claim to certain unalienable rights, they were the source of our laws, and standards for social interaction and justice...

That has all changed. Today, People and governments see how far they can push the boundaries of good behavior and power without incurring rebellion or violence... For decades now, governments have adopted President Obama’s slogan of “Yes We Can”!Can we establish an entire branch of government dedicated to education even though there is no Constitutional grant of authority to do it? Yes We Can! We fight several undeclared wars lasting many years killing thousands, we create an entire dependent population thru social welfare programs none of which are Constitutional.

It is time we returned to our founding fathers faith and constitutional government... reorganizing and limiting the Federal Govrnments scope and power to those enumerated powers in the Constitution... and no more.  We must also restrict the Courts from using Stari Decisis and the courts judgments as LAW... they are not law, they are the Courts rendering of justice in a particular case and only that case.

Views: 1285

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Rosie, remember you are conversing  with a guy that still believes America was founded on Christian principle and the founders were are good Christian men.

He is clueless about the country he lives in, who governs it, and still doesn't know he took an oath to a document that doesn't exist.

 Do not confuse Christianity with Masonería, EU Zionism.

The wealthy have lost their way... they no longer feed the Ox and the Ox is turning upon them... their response... import new oxen... open the borders and replace those objecting to enslavement. The American dream no lolnger supplies viable hope for the masses and they no longer accept the lies of their leaders... the result is an implosion... the collapse of authority and the rise of rebellion.

The free market must also be a just market... one must not muzzel the Ox or refuse to earn a wage thru honest work... Profit and income must reflect ones acutal contribution to the economy... by adding real value to the market/economy.  The wealthyi who manipulate markets and make huge profits without adding value to the market place violate God's economic laws... to use a just scale and equal measure in the market place.

Ashkenazic Jews "European Parliament Zionism Jews",  their Church legislation banned Christians from lending money in exchange for interest.

Jews are not supposed to lend money to other Jews with intertest... However, they can lend to gentiles at interest.  The same appies to Muslims. Muslims are not to lend other Muslims money with interest.

Jews Law, Talmud, you have clarified British European Parliament.

What right did the British have giving away property that does not belong to them?

Depends on what property you are inquiring about and when the event occurred... For Centuries, the LAW OF CONQUEST was used to secure new lands and soverignty over nations was established by might...  the ability to enforce one's will and laws over another.

It is surprising that you don't understand this concept... as the Law of Conquest is the principal means by which one establishes their political goals over another... The Law of Conquest superceeds all other laws.  The conquer writes history and establishes the frame work for the rule of law in the vanquished lands... This precept is still at work to this day.  MIGHT MAKES RIGHT.

The UN was supposed to end such conduct in the public forum.

 What right did the British have giving away what does not belong to them?

"Promised Land Canaan".

It is surprising that you don't understand this.

I did not say that the British did not give away lands not historically or spiritually theirs to give... In fact, I never discussed any particular event where Britian used its POWER too subvert or assign soverignty to others...

What I did say is that 'Might Makes Right'...  for eons the LAW OF CONQUEST provided the strong with the power to dispose of the property and rights of the weak... period.  Why you can't understand reality and the exercise of power... says more aboiut the failure of your eduction than I have time to discuss.  

Further, it is not NECESSARILY by any moral superiority or rational right of law that the MIGHTY, the VICTORS assign the rights of loosers and the vanqished... it is purly by the Law of Conquest... that most borders were established and soverignty defined in this world.

 The land was given to Moses by God. The British Global Migration Compact will send some Palestine's to America.

 Sweden, 50,000 Muslims and Africans were Migrated into a small town of Christian Jews, for over 4 months now there has been no further communication from friends that report the rapes and murders.


The problem is that Congress has subordinated our national security interests to their Socialist desire for open borders and diversity ... as they willingly bring Palesinians to settle in America... as part of their new world order.

Sweden is overrun by socialist and they are paying a high price for their ignorance... multi-culturalism and diversity has brought nothing but lawlessness and deviant social behavior to Sweden... NOT ALL CULTURES ARE EQUAL nor should they be supported or embraced by the worlds governments.

America must wake up or risk facing similar debauchery as is occuring in Sweden and much of Europe.. In fact, it is already here ... the MSM simply fails to report on the criminal acts and social impact.




Political Cartoons by Will O'Toole

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


INCEST? Official High School Records Support Claim That Democrat Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother

Ten years ago, in February 2009, Democrat Ilhan Omar married her biological brother.

Embedded video
Wojciech Pawelczyk 🇵🇱@PolishPatriotTM

Minnesota Press Raises Questions About Ilhan Omar's Former Marriage

Ilhan Omar won a historic victory in 206 over 44-year incumbent DFL Rep. Phyllis Kahn.

Ilhan Omar built a vast coalition of East African voters to defeat the incumbent in Minneapolis.

The liberal media forgot to mention Ilhan was married to her brother.

Power Line reported:

A reader has written us to point out that the Somali website Somalispot posted information last week suggesting Omar’s involvement in marriage and immigration fraud. The post notes that Omar married Ahmed Hirsi in 2002. Hirsi is the father of Omar’s three children. Omar is depicted with Hirsi and their children on Omar’s campaign website.

The post further notes that Omar married her brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, implying that the latter marriage assisted his entry into the United States. Her brother was a British citizen. “As soon as Ilhan Omar married him,” the post continues, “he started university at her [a]lma mater North Dakota State University where he graduated in 2012. Shortly thereafter, he moved to Minneapolis where he was living in a public housing complex and was later evicted. He then returned to the United Kingdom where he now lives.”

Ilhan Omar was elected to be a State Representative for District 60B November 8, 2016 and took her oath on the Quran.

In 2017, several months after Omar’s marriage history briefly created a national news item, Omar quietly petitioned family court for a default divorce, claiming she could not locate Elmi.

In October 208 David Steinberg at PJ Media posted proof that Rep. Ilhan Omar did indeed marry her brother back in 2009.

Rep. Omar has stated that she did marry “British citizen” Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, though the allegation that he is her brother is “absurd and offensive.”

However, according to official student enrollment records archived by St. Paul Public Schools and the state of Minnesota, an “Ahmed N. Elmi” was enrolled as a senior in the Class of 2003 at Arlington Senior High School in St. Paul, MN, from September 6, 2002, until June 10, 2003. He graduated and received a diploma.

And it gets worse…

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is under investigation for using her campaign funds when she was a state lawmaker to pay for her divorce.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service