The US Constitution is made for a Moral and Religious People... it is wholly inadequate to govern any other

“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” — John Adams.

Our founding fathers were devout Christians, the precepts and hallmarks of our Constitutional Republic reflect our Christian values and standards... if you want to be an atheist, agnostic, or hedonist you must understand that our government was established on Judeo/Christian precepts and can not function properly without them.

Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation that “[l]iberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith" was noted as the corner stone of America's greatness by Tocqueville... and that which separated us from the fallen governments of Europe. For, hundreds of years, the Natural Law and morality formed the foundation for our claim to certain unalienable rights, they were the source of our laws, and standards for social interaction and justice...

That has all changed. Today, People and governments see how far they can push the boundaries of good behavior and power without incurring rebellion or violence... For decades now, governments have adopted President Obama’s slogan of “Yes We Can”!Can we establish an entire branch of government dedicated to education even though there is no Constitutional grant of authority to do it? Yes We Can! We fight several undeclared wars lasting many years killing thousands, we create an entire dependent population thru social welfare programs none of which are Constitutional.

It is time we returned to our founding fathers faith and constitutional government... reorganizing and limiting the Federal Govrnments scope and power to those enumerated powers in the Constitution... and no more.  We must also restrict the Courts from using Stari Decisis and the courts judgments as LAW... they are not law, they are the Courts rendering of justice in a particular case and only that case.

Views: 1285

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 The above document stated by a College Connected to the Federal Government of the date 1787, this was tested, the 12 States Constitutional document tested, 1783, and 1781 on two different test.

US Constitution, September 17, 1787 tested to the date of Oct 31, 1787.

So if I break this all down in separate images,

 I am willing to bet the signatures of the founding fathers, they match up with the The Sussex Declaration

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/professor-danielle-allen-e...

 Oppps got to go, Ronald give birth to kittens...

As stated many times before all this ta-do is about nothing... the Sussex Document may be one of several attempts to negotiate a peaceful break with England... who cares, it is without any legal standing, has no legal impact on oir Constitution, as ratified by all 13 of the Colonies... not 12.

 In The Year of our Lord Jesus Christ, September 17, 1787, of common belief that this should of been the bonds of the US Constitution.

 The King a allegory, a story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.

 My faith, my God, where has it all vanished, no treaty should ever enslave God's Children, or a nation.

It vanished because no one put both the Declaration and the Constitution together.

The Declaration, with its claim to God Almighty as our Creator, and source of our UNalienable rights, and HIS LAWS, otherwise stated as the Laws of Nature and Nature's God.

God's laws are above the laws of physics, gravity, mathematics, etc.. His laws are for peace, righteous dominion of the earth and all thereof. Enshrined in our founders' writings and beliefs.

No one puts them together as they should be, the Declaration and God's Laws are the Spirit of our Constitution. They are the Spirit of Life. Over America, to each and to all.

What has been abandoned must and shall be proclaimed in order to be reclaimed.  Amen.

7 hours have passed, Mr. Nelson has lost his voice, Rosie and Jean, blog on ladies...:)-

Yep, got that right Hank, Jean and Rosie, got the Ronald...

yep sure did...:)

Unlike some I have other things to do beside responding to this web site... I will get back when I can... responding to most of the queries by those on the site.

Ok Ronald, we will give ya all the time you need to respond to Rosie and Jean, I understand...:)

Need to borrow the book...:)

 Can people still hear the prayers of the Israeli people, they still pray for God to free them once again from the evil that Moses brought them out of.

Judaeo precepts, is only found in the Talbot, which recognizes Jesus Christ, the Talbot, like the New Testament, brought a change for Jews, the New Testament, bound by Christian Traditions.

 One book does not bare false judgement against the other.

Rosie:

The Talmod not the Talbot (whatever that is) contains the fundamentals of Jewish law and tradition... I have never heard of the Talbot.  

See: 

The Oral Law -Talmud & Mishna - Jewish Virtual Library
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-oral-law-talmud-and-mishna

Common sense suggests that some sort of oral tradition was always needed to accompany the Written Law, because the Torah alone, even with its 613 commandments, is an insufficient guide to Jewish life.  The Talmud & Mishna fill this need..

Perhaps you can provide a link to an authoritative source for the "Talbot"... thnaks.

Talbot Jewish book: https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=qBCSXImcGu2zggeNkq-I...

 You see Ronald, more and more people who are Jewish, are rejecting the Talmud, as a old stick in the mud, like the old testament, when Rabbis  start covering up facts a about Jesus, then people that are Jews, step away from it.

 More Jews which you are not, "Ronald", are turning to Christianity.

 I myself do more of a historical backgrounds on things, that why I do not follow the King James Bible, my choice...

bye bye

LOL Tif.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Will O'Toole

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

INCEST? Official High School Records Support Claim That Democrat Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother

Ten years ago, in February 2009, Democrat Ilhan Omar married her biological brother.

Embedded video
Wojciech Pawelczyk 🇵🇱@PolishPatriotTM

Minnesota Press Raises Questions About Ilhan Omar's Former Marriage

Ilhan Omar won a historic victory in 206 over 44-year incumbent DFL Rep. Phyllis Kahn.

Ilhan Omar built a vast coalition of East African voters to defeat the incumbent in Minneapolis.

The liberal media forgot to mention Ilhan was married to her brother.

Power Line reported:

A reader has written us to point out that the Somali website Somalispot posted information last week suggesting Omar’s involvement in marriage and immigration fraud. The post notes that Omar married Ahmed Hirsi in 2002. Hirsi is the father of Omar’s three children. Omar is depicted with Hirsi and their children on Omar’s campaign website.

The post further notes that Omar married her brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, implying that the latter marriage assisted his entry into the United States. Her brother was a British citizen. “As soon as Ilhan Omar married him,” the post continues, “he started university at her [a]lma mater North Dakota State University where he graduated in 2012. Shortly thereafter, he moved to Minneapolis where he was living in a public housing complex and was later evicted. He then returned to the United Kingdom where he now lives.”

Ilhan Omar was elected to be a State Representative for District 60B November 8, 2016 and took her oath on the Quran.

In 2017, several months after Omar’s marriage history briefly created a national news item, Omar quietly petitioned family court for a default divorce, claiming she could not locate Elmi.

In October 208 David Steinberg at PJ Media posted proof that Rep. Ilhan Omar did indeed marry her brother back in 2009.

Rep. Omar has stated that she did marry “British citizen” Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, though the allegation that he is her brother is “absurd and offensive.”

However, according to official student enrollment records archived by St. Paul Public Schools and the state of Minnesota, an “Ahmed N. Elmi” was enrolled as a senior in the Class of 2003 at Arlington Senior High School in St. Paul, MN, from September 6, 2002, until June 10, 2003. He graduated and received a diploma.

And it gets worse…

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is under investigation for using her campaign funds when she was a state lawmaker to pay for her divorce.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service