The US Constitution is made for a Moral and Religious People... it is wholly inadequate to govern any other

“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” — John Adams.

Our founding fathers were devout Christians, the precepts and hallmarks of our Constitutional Republic reflect our Christian values and standards... if you want to be an atheist, agnostic, or hedonist you must understand that our government was established on Judeo/Christian precepts and can not function properly without them.

Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation that “[l]iberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith" was noted as the corner stone of America's greatness by Tocqueville... and that which separated us from the fallen governments of Europe. For, hundreds of years, the Natural Law and morality formed the foundation for our claim to certain unalienable rights, they were the source of our laws, and standards for social interaction and justice...

That has all changed. Today, People and governments see how far they can push the boundaries of good behavior and power without incurring rebellion or violence... For decades now, governments have adopted President Obama’s slogan of “Yes We Can”!Can we establish an entire branch of government dedicated to education even though there is no Constitutional grant of authority to do it? Yes We Can! We fight several undeclared wars lasting many years killing thousands, we create an entire dependent population thru social welfare programs none of which are Constitutional.

It is time we returned to our founding fathers faith and constitutional government... reorganizing and limiting the Federal Govrnments scope and power to those enumerated powers in the Constitution... and no more.  We must also restrict the Courts from using Stari Decisis and the courts judgments as LAW... they are not law, they are the Courts rendering of justice in a particular case and only that case.

Views: 1300

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Next, the Constitution has been abused from the beginning and continues to be unto this day. You miss spelled Constitution Ronald...:)

 And it does not look like the NWO UN is fear full of God.

"Next, the Constituiton has been abused from the beginning and continues to be unto this day... " this is what is commonly known as a typo.. the 'i' and the 't' being reversed.. not a spelling issue.  Albiet, we can go down the spelling and gramar road if you like..

You mispelled (fear full) ... it is one word, not two.  (Fearful).  And, in a reply you made 5 hours ago, you said:  "You got that right"  well it's not "you got" it is You have that right... I can go on and on... want to dance ... we can if you like. 

However, nothing would be served except to embarrace you...

Ronald please consider there are some key issues missing from the Constitution.

1st., and of most importance is a recognition of the peoples sovereignty defining that they rule themselves and the States they reside in. Instead we are classified as Citizen subjects of the government.. This status was not recognized because Ben Franklin as a representative for the King for negotiating the Definitive Treaty of Peace only agreed to make the States/Body Politic sovereigns. Remember he agreed the King was to be the Prince Elector of the united States of America = controller of the Body Politic. Only one president has openly recognized us as a sovereign people and that we rule. That was President Trump at the UN meeting where the Whole World was told of this. However, few Americans knew what that meant and what should have done in making a demand of Trump to write declaration of our recognized sovereignty to be recognized by all that represent us. Because that hasn't happened we remain citizens subjects of the government. Primarily Congress rules over us from the very beginning by writing so many private laws we don't know of. The 1779 1st Act of Congress has held free of penalty for breach of the constitution because they we to never take an oath to it.

2nd there is no definition for what a Republic is and the responsibilities to it. This is most likely why after the Constitutional Convention Franklin's response to what we have was "a Republic if you can keep it". Couldn't this be why per the Constitution stating, every State shall have a Republican form of government was totally breached? Therefore, we can not return to what never was.

3rd. We were given no control of our currency and banking systems. They couldn't do that because Franklin agreed the King shall be the Arch-Treasure of the United States of America and George Washington backed this by implementing the War Power Act 1791 to pay back his King.

So what does impact does this have on the Declaration of Independence  other than the Queen of England chuckles when we celebrate 4th of July. 

First,  Citizen... is a classification used to identify an individual and his relationship with his government... It was a new concept in a world full of SUBJECTS when used by our founders. ... Most of the world of that era were 'subjects' living under the power of a potentate ... king or autocrat. The idea of citizenship was an empowering change for the individual then and remains so today. 

A citizen is not singularly sovereign .., however, he or she is by consent part of a sovereign government.  Citizens are individual members of the whole government, by right of contract with the sovereign government. A Constitutional Republic, for example, is made up of Citizens whose sovereign rights are recognized by a contract with the government .. in our case, a Constitution and various statutory laws provide our citizens with the protections and privilleges of government.

Citizenship in a Republic provides an individual with the right to consent... to be governed... by representatives and laws generally accepted by a majority of its citizens.  Should a citizen disagree they may renounce their citizenship and leave the Republic for ... some other arrangement to secure their rights and liberty... if available.

Citizens are required to obey the laws of their government... Citizens exchange certain liberties, specified in their contract with the government, (Constitution, etc) for the mutual benefit of the whole (society in general)... In exchange for obeying the government's laws, the government works to guarantee the life, liberty, and property of its citizens, from anarchy and the many evils present in the world... 

Citizenship comes with mutual responsibilities for governing...  it requires a moral and religious people to maintain a government that is both responsive, effective, and morally acceptable.  Immoral and bad citizenship leads to immoral and bad government.  Government's with citizens reflect the consent and moral character of their citizens.

First your government is a fiction. They are a corporation - Persons - persona - just impersonators so why would you consider yourself a citizen of one. all you have to do is pull a D&B Report on the government agencies in your state for proof.

What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. Again, we labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. We have been lied to. So phooey on the rest you believe IMHO from their own documents. 

I believe you are confusing Washington, DC, the City, for our Constitutional Government.  Most cities in the US are INCORPORATED for the purposes of liability.  The same exists for the District of Columbia.

The United States of America is a Republic... with a Constitutional government created by the people, and for the people.  The Constitution provides the only lawful basis for government activity and is monitored by our elected representatives who are charged with monitoring and regulating the Constitutional institutions of government.  Any fiat government, operating as a corporation, or not, has no Constitutional Authority to exist.

Hence, IF... IF, there were a separate Corparation running America... it could be abolished with the simple stroke of a pen... an Executive Order ending it.  The power to sustain a hidden corporation or a subversive and illicit one is limited and the People if properly informed would have every right to demand it end immediately.

Some believe there is a corporate body running the US government (Federal Government).  A corporate entity, created under statutory law, to facilitate the interests of certain economic parties. They postulate that it operates outside of our Constitution and for the benefit of a few elite, rich individuals and aristocrats.

It would serve the public interests if the President would discuss this issue and clarify any usurpation of our Constitutional Republic by a Corporate entity... and if true end it, with the issue of an executive order removing its corporate status and illegal government operations.

Where do you put the FED in all of this, meaning, in usurping our rights and Congress' authority to manage and print our money? Can it be ended?

The United states of America was never a Republic because the founder failed to describe what is and the responsibilities to it. If they did all States would have a Republican form of government per the constitution.

Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution provides, in pertinent part, that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.”
Notwithstanding this guarantee, the current form of government found in “every State in this Union,” id., though seemingly republican in form, is ultimately municipal—because, as shown herein below, every such State (i.e., body politic, not geographic area) has been transmuted into a political subdivision of the District of Columbia, a municipal corporation, 16 Stat. 419, whose municipal law is Roman Civil Law.

And the District of Columbia is not a part of the United States of America.

And again, what you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.

you should depend on government documents the truth is in your face. they have to tell us the truth just not where to find it or that it exist. Good Luck

The R's are in the deep pockets of the international lobbyists, just like the D's are in bed with the international lobbyists, globalists and marxists. The R's do not care one whit that the marxists want globab control, as long as they get theirs (as in power and money and protection)

You got that right Jean, they do not give a shit about the Constitution or God, as long as money is their God for people to surrender to.

 Tell it like it is!!!!!!!!!

Please consider there is no stated penalty for breaching the Constitution.

Plus, the 1789 First Act of Congress made it so that no one would take an oath to the  Constitution repeating the words of the Preamble title.

All are only allowed to repeat the words "the Constitution of the United States". There is no document to be found in law or at law with that title.

The corrective wording should be "the Constitution for the United States of America" until the proper oath is taken the Constitution for the United States of America remains a dormant doc.

Statutory law provides for vilations of ones oath of office... irregardless of any frivolous efforts to escape based on the wording problems.  The law also provides for acts of treason and sedition... the over throw of our Constitution and its government.  The Constituiton lists treason, piracy and counterfiting as crimes against the Constitution. 

Federal law regulating the taking of the oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.

The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

I can find other federal law that make it a criminal act to violate various clauses of the US Constitution... piracy, weights and measures, counterfiting, failure to pay taxes, breeches to due process, and unlawful seizures, privacy laws, etc., etc., all with Constitutional roots.




Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


1 Billion Dollar Net Worth!!! Oberlin College Claims Poverty To Avoid Paying Punitive Damages To Gibson’s Bakery

Although IRS reports show the university is worth around $1 billion, Oberlin College still claimed poverty to avoid paying punitive damages to Gibson’s Bakery.

As Breitbart News reported this week, the far-left Oberlin College lost a defamation case filed by Gibson’s Bakery after a local jury found the university liable for falsely accusing the family bakery of racism.

The jury ordered Oberlin on Friday to pay Gibson’s $11.2 million in compensatory damages for defamation and intentional interference with a business.

Legal Insurrection reported on Thursday that “the jury awarded a total of $33 million in punitive damages, which will probably be reduced by the court to $22 million because of the state law cap at twice compensatory.”

Legal Insurrection has been following the case for two years — since the beginning — and reports that the school’s only defense against a sizable punitive award is to pretend it is poor, despite holding assets that amount to a billion — with a “b” — dollars and despite paying some of its staffers more than a half-million dollars a year:

Oberlin College was so hellbent on getting the message out that their cash liquidity was in such dire straits — as the eight-person jury was figuring out if they wish to add $22.4 million to the school’s legal verdict bill — that they brought out the school’s president, Carmen Twillie Ambar to the stand to tell that part the story.

“We’ve created deficits … and over the next ten years, if this continues, that is unsustainable and we will not exist,” Ambar told the jury. She even indicated the school’s grants — about $60 million a year from the school, and lots of students get those scholarships as only 10% of them pay the full $70,000 a year — were important to preserve as “the accessibility of education” was a key component of the school’s purpose.


The college has more than $1 billion in funds and net assets according to the latest IRS 990 form, an endowment fund that had grown from $440 million to $887 million in the last 20 years, and because of its non-profit status, pays no taxes on any property it owns.

It also had 18 members of their administration making more than $100,00 a year. The president and chief financial officer of the school were both making more than $500,000 a year.

Grifters gonna grift…

The day after Donald Trump won the presidency, this nutball school apparently decided to take out its impotent woke-rage on this poor bakery, which has been part of the Oberlin community for more than a century.

It all started when three Oberlin students (who would later plead guilty in a plea deal) attempted to steal bottles of wine.

The proprietors caught the students and, while attempting to hold them until police arrived, were allegedly roughed up by the shoplifters. But because the students are black and the proprietors white — and with no respect for due process or facts — Oberlin staffers and students decided some vigilantism was in order and did everything in their considerable power to destroy this local bakery forever, to smite it off the map.

Classes were canceled so hundreds of students could protest in front of the small store while enjoying free food and drink, courtesy of the school. School staffers handed out fliers that basically described the family-owned bakery as the local branch of the KKK.

As a result, the bakery had to lay off almost all of its employees and barely avoided bankruptcy.

In the end, the three shoplifters said race had nothing to do with what happened.

For those of you interested in incurring $200,000 in debt before you even enter the workforce, it looks as though you can major in Mob Justice at Oberlin.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service