The US Constitution is made for a Moral and Religious People... it is wholly inadequate to govern any other

“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” — John Adams.

Our founding fathers were devout Christians, the precepts and hallmarks of our Constitutional Republic reflect our Christian values and standards... if you want to be an atheist, agnostic, or hedonist you must understand that our government was established on Judeo/Christian precepts and can not function properly without them.

Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation that “[l]iberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith" was noted as the corner stone of America's greatness by Tocqueville... and that which separated us from the fallen governments of Europe. For, hundreds of years, the Natural Law and morality formed the foundation for our claim to certain unalienable rights, they were the source of our laws, and standards for social interaction and justice...

That has all changed. Today, People and governments see how far they can push the boundaries of good behavior and power without incurring rebellion or violence... For decades now, governments have adopted President Obama’s slogan of “Yes We Can”!Can we establish an entire branch of government dedicated to education even though there is no Constitutional grant of authority to do it? Yes We Can! We fight several undeclared wars lasting many years killing thousands, we create an entire dependent population thru social welfare programs none of which are Constitutional.

It is time we returned to our founding fathers faith and constitutional government... reorganizing and limiting the Federal Govrnments scope and power to those enumerated powers in the Constitution... and no more.  We must also restrict the Courts from using Stari Decisis and the courts judgments as LAW... they are not law, they are the Courts rendering of justice in a particular case and only that case.

Views: 1334

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Constitution is non-binding. 

And the Founders said F--K You we are going to govern as we see fit and they did. 

Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution provides, in pertinent part, that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.”
Notwithstanding this guarantee, the current form of government found in “every State in this Union,” id., though seemingly republican in form, is ultimately municipal—because, as shown herein below, every such State (i.e., body politic, not geographic area) has been transmuted into a political subdivision of the District of Columbia, a municipal corporation, 16 Stat. 419, whose municipal law is Roman Civil Law.
Roman Civil Law equates to absolute, exclusive territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislative power (and executive and judicial jurisdiction) over residents of municipal territory.
Americans who do not physically reside in the District of Columbia today nevertheless are treated as residents of that municipality for legal purposes based on certain unconstitutional stealth legislation.

Again they have Private Laws that protects them and they never took an oath to the constitution. And they never wrote a PPM for what happens when they breach their employment contract. How convenient! Every time they speak its all theater and we pay  to attend.

Note: It doesn't say the United States of America shall guarantee 

All I can say is Amazing... Your overall view of America is totally irrational and obdurate...

It makes no sense to continue any form of discussion with a man who refuses to acknowledge the very underpinnings of our liberty and sovereignty... the basis for our Constitutional Repbulic...

We are not some subordinate principality of the English King, who managed to TRICK our forebarers into signing away their victory with the Paris Peace Treaty... to be ruled by an oligarchy of the King's henchmen.

The Constitution of the United States was founded as One Nation Under God.

 You all can duck Rosie, but you can not duck the truth. Look Up..:)

Again, but no one has ever, ever ever, has sworn an oath to "the Constitution for the United States of America" Back to the First Act of congress made this so. Your point is mute.

George Washington was of the highest Degree of the Masons. August 4, 1753, George Washington became a Master Mason, the highest rank in the Fraternity of Freemasonry, in his hometown of Fredericksburg, Virginia. Remember what he did with the War Power act. He didn't bail out We the People who were busted from the war and mending their wounds for years to come. He took care of the King.

Lincoln said We the People are the enemy with his War Power act. Pres Johnson vetoed it but the Northern States Congress vetoed President Johnson’s veto of Lincoln’s War Power Act, thereby reaffirming that all Americans are enemies of the State.

Who did Roosevelt bail out with his Emergency War Power Act? It wasn't the people - he stole from them and We remained enemies of the state/bankers.

Who did Obama bail out? Always follow the money in business ventures. The winners get paid.

The Constitution of the United States was founded as One Nation Under God? Read the Masonic oaths that Washington and his other Mason buddies took. Jesus never condoned this Satanic behavior. Freemasonry requires members to acknowledge a "god" in order to be accepted into the Lodge, the god of Freemasonry and the God of the Bible are not the same. There is a great difference between the two concepts of God.

Based on the Founders own writings with signatures it seems America was One New World Order under the King as Ben Franklin another Mason agreed the King is the Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the United States of America".

Again not my words, the Founders words with their signatures.. 

 The Founding Fathers shared many things, maybe I can get Tiffany to tell you about them.

 One very important note from history. Christianity was all most destroyed in Spain.  When Christianity regained its foot hold on the country,  Judaeo Masonería Jews left, why?

I have never read such a disortation of irrational, incompetent reasoning in my life...  A clear reading of the The Treaty of Paris (1783)  clearly stripped King Geroge III of all his titles and sovereign rights over the United States... all 13 Colonies... including his former title as Arch-Treasurer and Pricne Elector of the United States of America. 


Dear Ronald,

Do you believe the Royals passed on their status and authority to the next King or Queen. If not how did this happen.

S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."

Please present the actual facts that dispute what is documented with documents that make the first facts it null and void.

No one is debating that issue... However, Ricard is presenting a case that undermines the very fundamentals of ouir government.... Rosie is attempting to blame the Jew for all the worlds problems and others here are buying into one or both of the false arguments.  It is much more complicated...

The documents are on their own government websites and associated archive links. I undermine nothing. This is why I promote the use of PRIVATE LAW because it is written for them. Written for us only if we know of it. They make things legal we don't know of. They are Private not Public. No accountability to you.

It's not your government! It not your constitution - it is their Constitution written as a employment contract for those that are to represent you. But there is no stated penalty for breach of it and they took no oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of America. What is it you can't understand? They lied to you in history class with their American History books and Encyclopedia Britannica.

You don't even know what Private Law is... we went over this before... do we have to go over it again? SEE Below:

Comment on: Topic 'The US Constitution is made for a Moral and Religious People... it is wholly in…'
Stewart, 2006 go to: which states the following regarding Private Law: "Private Law: That portion of the law that defines, regulates, enforces, and administers relationships among individuals, associations, and corporations. As used in distinction to public law, the term describes that part of the law which is administered between citizen and citizen, or that is concerned with the definition, regulation, and enforcement of rights in cases where both the person in whom the right inheres and the person upon whom the obligation rests are private." Mirriam Webster Definition of 'Private Law'... ": a branch of law concerned with private persons, property, and relationships..." See: ; As can be seen from the legal definition 'Private Law' pertains to 'legal relationships' among individuals, associations and corporatoiins... not Governments. Hence, the study or citation of private law has little bearing on government, and its relationship with the individual, (sovereign or citizen). For a tutorial on Private verses Public Law See:…
Added by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) at 5:28am on April 1, 2019
Comment on: Topic 'The US Constitution is made for a Moral and Religious People... it is wholly in…'
rt of jus commune... which deals with relationships between individuals: the law of contracts or torts, and the law of obligations are examples of private law. Private Law is to be distinguished from public law... which deals with relationships between both natural and artificial persons and the state, including regulatory statutes, penal (criminal) law and other law that affects the public order. In general terms, private law involves... interactions between private citizens, whereas public law involves interrelations between the state and the general population. Private Law has very little to do with government interactions with individuals... as such any long-winded discussion of private laws would serve little in advancing the debate regarding the Constitution and our form of government.…
Added by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) at 8:06am on March 31, 2019

No dictionary please rcrs-PrivateLawDoc6StipulationAndSettlementAgreement_Arbitration.pdf

rcrs-Private_Law_114-31_Dec_3_2016.pdf. That's not how it works real time. Produce a government doc. You still don't understand Private Law. Did you read my docs. Did you read the awards to the illegally imprisoned. They got what they demanded as remedy.

Remember who wrote what you pasted. That's not todays Congress

Rand Paul agreed with the arbitration and brought it to the floor for resolve..

They cannot rebut their own laws that protect us..

I have no time to teach the unteachable you. Read the 100s of Private Laws yourself. I can't help you debrief yourself  of almost everything you think to know is a lie and deception.

The case you submitted, under the PDF link, was not brought under Private Law...

It originated under Public law...filed in a Federal Court, it represents a case brought under Public law,  a case of  false imprsionment and the breech of an individuals rights against the Unites States.. It represents the settelrment of those matters,  under public law, as a claim against the United States.... for false imprisonment among other violations of criminal law by AGENTS of The United States..

For a tutorial on Private verses Public Law See:…




Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


Breaking — West Virginia Lawmakers Invite Persecuted Pro-Second Amendment Counties In Virginia To Join Their State

West Virginia lawmakers introduced legislation to invite persecuted pro Second Amendment Counties to join their state.

The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution to remind Virginia residents from Frederick County that they have a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia.

West Virginia freedom fighters broke away from Virginia Democrat slave owners during the Civil War.

This week West Virginia has once again invited persecuted Virginia pro 2-A counties to come join their state.

Sounds like a winning plan!

Resolution 8 reads as follows:


(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter, Linville, Sypolt, Bibby, Hill, Ellington, Higginbotham, J. Kelly, Mandt, Pack, Dean and P. Martin)

[Introduced January 14, 2020]

Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia

Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and

Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and

Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and

Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and

Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and

Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and

Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and

Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and

Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and

Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and

Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and

Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia.

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service