If anyone thinks this is a joke or a lie, I can assure you all the videos will come on line. Every last one of them. I do not support what Hitler did, or this US Government for turning a blind eye.


Bitchcute Tif @ bitchute.com


Views: 459

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The testimony of ONE BOOK... by who knows who... is supposed to reverse and repudiate the works and testimony of tens of thousands ... I don't think so.  It is delusional to claim JEWS were behind the Holocaust... that Jews not Nazi's created all the problems assocaited with WW2.

In fact, the Neo-Nazi movement would be very proud to claim your point of view... something I fully and completely repudiate.

The first nazi concentration camp centraton camp opened in 1933 not 31... not all of the supposed 42K camps were designated as Death Camps. Dachau was originally opened as a prison for political prisioners it was converted to a Death Camp much latter. When was the first concentration camp opened?  It was Dachau in 1933.

Dachau concentration camp (/ˈdɑːxaʊ/; German: Konzentrationslager (KZ) Dachau, IPA: [ˈdaxaʊ]) was the first of the Nazi concentration camps opened in 1933, intended to hold political prisoners.

See: Dachau concentration camp - Wikipedia


 Mr. Nelson,

 We gave the book a name the Book of Jews,and it haa over 100,000 people who shared their life. The collection of the Books, is larger then the Books of the Talmud.

 So yes the word of Christian Jews, will make a difference. When Jews of Poland speak up about their Genocide  in videos, YouTube silence their voice.  You elite you are protecting that wrote this history, Jewish Bankers....:)-

 Give me a break man....:)-

 That war was not over the genocide of Jews, it was because Hitler dumped their money.

  I guess they messed up when they migrated German Jews to Israel...:)- WW2

Hell man even today, they bash the Israeli Government for allowing in the Rothschild banking...

 Go figure...LMAO....

Compliations of testimonies by Jews of Nazi attrocities need to be viewed individually... selective accounts may or may not be accurate or taken out of context.  This so called mystery BOOK is just that a mystery and certainly proves absolutely nothing... as it is not even available to research its verasity...

Offering a BOOK... as testimony to anything ... a book not available, with accounts we can not verify or even view is rediculously obsured... it certainly is not proof of anything but the ignorant assumption that those offering it as proof of their argument want us to buy a PIG IN A POKE... to accept what we have not examined. 

Expecting a rational person to accept such undocumented evidence (the mysterious book) as fact, when it has not been corroberated and the accounts are not present to review and verify is beyound obsured.  Obsurd, is not strong enough... reckless and dangersous, would be more applicable in characterizing such assumptions... as we are being ask to believe in something we have not read, reviewed, or verified.

Expecting a rational person to accept what the elite wrote or Jews wrote about WW2...

I will just have to think on that want I...:)


Good... rejecting irrational assumptions based on 'secret books' and accounts by individuals not available to question or too even verify that thy made the statements is the first rational comment you have made...

 I reported the system error of the reply button, and words dropped after posted.

 After weighing in on all the comments, W as well as Mr. Nelson's.

42,000 Camps, confirmed.

The timeline of the event WW1 to WW2, confirmed.

Normal human reaction, in the face of genocide, US authorities, should of terminated the death camps first. The timeline shows no attempt until the war with Japan.


wikipedia.org listed white genocide as a rise of Nazism, confirmed

1 million white farmers went to England, confirmed

Over 15000 went to Russia, confirmed

The US may not of allowed any African farmers in.

 Process the videos and upload.

 I am going to ask, hold off on publishing the video of Hitlers flag with the US flag, Hitler's visits, I viewed a website, I tried to call, maybe you will get the message here.

 Just for a while, hold off on that video.

Call me

Maybe you definition of 'CONFIRMED' is different than most normal individuals ... please provide links to reputable and knowledgable sources that have confirmed your statements regarding Hitler visiting the US of A and the numbers of Concentration Camps that remained open after 1945... for that matter the speculation advanced in your posts regarding the total numbers of concentration camps needs to be corrobrorated with links to the facts... not just a personal statement... "confirmed".

Nothing is confirmed... the link to wiki provided above is to their home page... not to a topic relating to white genocide or numbers of concentation camps.  The TTD news site is a hot bed for irrational and unsupported conspiracty theory ... worse, fake news... embelished to make it appeal to the  radical elements in the aright wing patriot movement.  Fake news from any source helps no one.

Any CONFIRMATION of FACTS requires a direct link to competent articles, and the facts required to support confirmation... with TTD that goes double... as that site has proven to be rediculously inaccurate and loaded with fake or twisted commentary being reported as fact... when it is not... FACTUAL at all.

Mr. Nelson, did you know that Benjamin Netanyahu stated in a video, that Hitler did not want to kill the Jewish People,  Benjamin Netanyahu said it was 100 years of lies.

 Try me man, I am going to put the video on line...:)-




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service