Materials Related to July 2018 Press Release: ... "The Sussex Declaration: Dating the Parchment Manuscript of the Declaration of ... Download "Golden Letters: James Wilson, the Declaration of Independence, and the Sussex Declaration".

 We are going to show a step by step view of the signatures, that was signed on that document & was by the Founding Fathers Of America. And the people that state the document is a fake, this "Sussex" Preamble Of the Declaration Of Independence 2018.  The Democrats as well as them at Harvard University Of London England Are Idiots.

Above is their statement below is our Facts Check. Most people do not write the same all the time.

Edward Rutledge a match on his signature above.

John Penn, a match on his signature above.

Thomas Heyward Jr. match, If you look close at the document you will see Tho' Heyward or Hayward Jr. I guess they want to leave out the Jr.

Benjamin Harrison match signature above .

John Witherspoon confirmed match signature above.

Thomas McKean match signature above .

Richard Stockon match signature above.

William Floyed match signature above.

More Signature below.

A close up views of the signatures

Now for Official Signatures of John Witherspoon- 1770 to 1776

William Floyd signatures, did not have "D" at the end of his signature.

John Penn signatures,


 Benjamin Franklin

Views: 77

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You did a nice job Tif, very nice.

Still waiting on the phone call Ding Bat...

Perhaps someone can explain to me why we are spending so much time debating documents that had little impact during their time and certainly less on todays political climate.

Its ok Ronald, I here its cool to take the side of the Demo-nuts,  and they started it, and again in 2018, fancy that.


Mr. Nelson,
Before this is over, you will change your mind over what we found, and some of the issues not seen.

Islamic Legal Studies Program at Harvard Law School

Promoting research and providing resources to advance the academic study of Islamic law.
‎Fellowship · ‎SHARIAsource · ‎People · ‎Fellows Sharia Law

Harvard University Sharia Law

The Standard Bank Group
The Standard Bank Group is South Africa's largest bank and distinguished by its extensive operations in 17 African countries. With a heritage of over 150 years, Standard Bank Group is a leading integrated financial services group on the African continent. It has an on-the-ground presence in 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, fit-for-purpose representation outside Africa and a strategic partnership with ICBC. This unique footprint supports their strategy to connect African markets to each other and to pools of capital globally. Standard Bank’s multi-year gift allowed the Growth Lab to accelerate the pace of discovery – and application – of emerging theories of growth for emerging economies in Africa.


Investec Asset Management
Investec Asset Management (IAM) has grown from domestic roots in South Africa into an international asset management firm with $105bn in assets. IAM is committed to studying and understanding the drivers of sustained economic growth. Through its Investment Institute, the firm is supporting CID with its ground-breaking research and theories on Economic Complexity and the role of productive knowledge as a primary driver of growth. In addition, Investec Asset Management is also a Founding Member of The Atlas online. The insights from this research provide a new source of data for government policy making and for identifying long-term investment prospects.

BBVA is a multinational group providing financial services in over 30 countries and to 53 million customers. The Group has a solid leading position in the Spanish market, where it began operating over 150 years ago. It also has leading franchises in South America, it is the main financial institution in Mexico, one of the 15 biggest banks in the United States and has strategic investments in associates in Turkey and China. BBVA is working to build lasting relationships with customers and provide maximum value to both our stakeholders and society at large with projects such as education, social entrepreneurship, research and culture.

CAF Development Bank of Latin America
CAF Development Bank of Latin America currently consists of eighteen countries in Latin America, the Caribbean and Europe, as well as fourteen private banks from the Andean region. CAF promotes sustainable development and regional integration through efficient resource mobilization for the timely delivery of multiple, high added value financial services to public and private clients in their shareholder countries. The Atlas online helps CAF identify the resource capabilities of countries and regions and determine future opportunities for sustainable development.

The Coppel Group
Founded in Sinaloa, Mexico, in 1939, Coppel is one of the most successful businesses in Mexico and one of the most successful chains of department stores in Latin America. Grupo Coppel believes in the consolidation of societies in Mexico and Latin America where individuals face the same opportunities to develop their capacity to the fullest, are free to choose their destiny, and contribute to the development of their nation. As a result, Grupo Coppel developed the think tank “Ethos Public Policy Lab” to provide ideas, recommendations and public policy proposals in Mexico, focusing in the areas of poverty alleviation, economic and sustainable development and consolidation of democracy.

The International Centre for Sports Security
The International Centre for Sports Security (ICSS) is a ground breaking organization whose mission is to improve security, safety and integrity in sport by addressing real issues and providing world-leading services, skills, networks and knowledge. The ICSS is an global center with its headquarters in Doha, Qatar. The ICSS’s clients include key stakeholders such as event organizers, governments and bidding nations, infrastructure owners, sport associations, leagues and clubs. The ICSS works in security and risk advisory, training, research and knowledge gathering and all aspects across sport integrity.

Mindteck, a global product engineering and IT services company with US headquarters in Enola, PA, donated critical technical advisory and development services to The Atlas online. Enhancements to The Atlas include infrastructure upgrades, beta application testing, improved user interface, a technology roadmap and the development of the "Build your Story" feature.

United States International Trade Commission
The United States International Trade Commission (USTR) is an independent, quasijudicial Federal agency with broad investigative responsibilities on matters of trade. The mission of the Commission is to administer US trade remedy law, provide the President, USTR and Congress with independent analysis and support on matters of tariffs, international trade, and U.S. competitiveness and maintain the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. The Atlas online provides USTR with invaluable data and research on international trade, U.S. competitiveness and tariffs.


Bancóldex is the entrepreneurial development bank of Colombia. It is committed to developing financial and non-financial instruments geared to enhance the competitiveness, productivity, growth and internationalization of Colombian enterprises. Leveraging on its unique relational equity and market position, Bancóldex manages financial assets, develops access solutions to financing and deploys innovative capital solutions, to foster and accelerate company growth. Besides offering traditional loans, Bancóldex has been appointed to implement several development program such as iNNpulsa Colombia, iNNpulsa Mipyme, Banca de las Oportunidades, and the Productive Transformation Program, all of them, in an effort to consolidate an integrated offer to promote Colombian business environment and overall competitiveness.

MasterCard Center for Inclusive Growth
The mission of the MasterCard Center for Inclusive Growth is to empower people through inclusive economies. To accomplish this, the Center seeks to fill a critical need – invest in innovative and practical programs and connect the experience and knowhow of four key stakeholders: the development community, governments, academia, and business. The Center is working to create and translate research into tangible and actionable insights, partnering to reach micro-entrepreneurs with the tools and support necessary to join the formal financial economy, and expanding understanding into the drivers and barriers of inclusion.

Open Society Foundations
Investor and philanthropist George Soros established the Open Society Foundations to help countries make the transition from communism. The organization's mission is to build vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable to their citizens. With the help of the Open Society Foundations, and in cooperation with the new Government of Albania, CID launched a research project that aims at identifying Albania's binding constraints and proposing policy solutions that can relax them. A team of prominent researchers and experts in the fields of macroeconomics, energy policy, public finance, agriculture and labor markets, among other fields, was gathered for this mission.

Foundation for an Open America
Founded by Robert Hildreth, the Foundation for an Open America was a key partner, along with the Center for Global Development, in CID's Migration Project, which worked to understand and strengthen the links between migration, remittances and prosperity.

Center for Global Development
The Center for Global Development was a key partner, along with the Foundation for an Open America, in CID's Migration Project which worked to understand and strengthen the links between migration, remittances and prosperity.

Harvard Law School:

Islamic Constitutionalism: Not Secular. Not Theocratic. Not Impossible.

 Asifa Quraishi-Landes will explain her current project, proposing a structure for Islamic constitutionalism that is inspired by Islamic jurisprudence and Muslim history, yet designed for contemporary realities. This structure is conceptually different from the typical “Islamic state” imagined by modern political Islam movements, as it is built upon the pre-colonial separation of Muslim lawmaking power: siyasa, made by rulers, and fiqh, articulated by religious legal scholars. She will argue that popular understandings of sharia fail to see the constitutional importance of these two legal realms, largely because global discourses about Islamic government are dominated by Eurocentric concepts of law (especially religious law). Quraishi-Landes will then present a proposal for Islamic constitutionalism that will demonstrate that—if we step outside the European nation-state paradigm to see sharia as an Islamic rule of law made up of both fiqh and siyasa—an Islamic constitutionalism that is not secular and not theocratic is not impossible.

 Quraishi-Landes is a full Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School, specializing in comparative Islamic and U.S. Constitutional law, with a current focus on modern Islamic constitutional theory.  She is a 2009 Carnegie Scholar and 2012 Guggenheim Fellow. Her recent publications include “Rumors of the Sharia Threat are Greatly Exaggerated: What American Judges Really Do with Islamic Family Law in Their Courtrooms,” and “Legislating Morality and Other Illusions about Islamic Government.” Currently, she is working on a book manuscript titled “Islamic Re-constitutionalism,” in which she presents a non-theocratic and non-secular model of Islamic constitutionalism for today’s Muslim-majority countries.

 Quraishi-Landes holds a doctorate from Harvard Law School and other degrees from Columbia Law School, the University of California, Davis, and the University of California,  Berkeley, and has served as law clerk in the United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  She has served as a Public Delegate on the United States Delegation to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, the Task Force on Religion and the Making of U.S. Foreign Policy for the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and as advisor to the Pew Task Force on Religion & Public Life.  She currently serves on the governing board of the Section on Islamic Law for the Association of American Law Schools, on the Board of the Muslim Public Service Network, and is past President and Board Member of NAML (National Association of Muslim Lawyers) as well as of Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights. She is an affiliate of the Muslim Women’s League, a Fellow with the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding and a member of the “Opinion Leaders Network” for the British Council’s “Our Shared Future” project.

  Co-sponsored by the Muslim Law Students Association and the Middle Eastern Law Students Association (MELSA) at Harvard Law School.

It is the bastardizing of our common law, by such subversive thinking, that we must stop... Ms. Landes should not be permittted to teach law school, and anyone foolish enough to send their childten to study under her are inviting disaster and committing cultural suicide.

Good day to you Mr. Nelson,

 According to what Tif and Hank shared, and I read this twice, the same people bringing funds to the caravan are the same people that became concerned because to many were challenging there document findings and considering the document a part of American History.

 One year passed then they did another news release, to challenge what others are saying, that they did not tell the truth. Tif is not the only one speaking out against them.

 Tif edit


build directive example, repost.

The problem is not the authenticity of the Sussex documents... it is their there lack of significance and relationship to the topic currently under discussion. The Sussex Declaration's authenticity... may carry weight in someone's theisis for their Doctrate Degree but it hardly impacts America's struggle to maintain our Constitutional roots.

America's stuggle for a return to political sanity... certainly doesn't hinge on proving the signatures on the Sussex document were or were not forgeries...  This debate is a waste of valuable time and resources... much like Shakespear once said ... full of sound and fury signifying nothing....

Morning Ronald,

 Da!!!, the Sussex document was written in America, ended up in England, the connection to the Sussex document is well noted and seen. If you find one lie the another, then by people that do not believe in America's sovereignty and history, they must of been schooled in common core.


One thing for sure Ronald,

 If you was my teacher in school, and brought up this document, and I went home and found out they did not tell the truth, I would bring my findings to school and show all my friend what I found out, and if ya made that statement there would be a Tea Party Protest in school.

I don't support the authenticity of this document one way or another... it is immiterial and has no weight on todays problems.  I would add, as stated before, there were several petitions sent to King George before the Declration of Independence was signed and sent.  All of the eardlier petitions became null and void... non-operative with the introduction of the Declartion of Independence.




Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

( – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service