Ted Cruz was born to an American mother and an alien father, in the country of Canada. Questions regarding the constitutional eligibility of Cruz to serve as President  surround his candidacy. 
Barack Obama was born to an American mother and an alien father in the island state of Hawaii.  Questions regarding the constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President surrounded his candidacy.
Ted Cruz is a Harvard trained lawyer,  He is verbally highly proficient.
Barack Obama is a Harvard lawyer.  He is verbally proficient with a teleprompter.
Ted Cruz is a one term Senator who has served only half of his term, now running for President.  Cruz has no executive experience running anything, not even running a lemonade stand.
Barack Obama was a one term Senator, who had served less than half of his term, when he ran for President.  Obama had no executive experience to prepare him for the most important executive position in the world.  The country has paid dearly for Obama's lack of executive experience and his unfitness for the job of President of the United States.
Does the Republican Party and the United States want to make the same mistake by electing a Ted Cruz to the White House?  Cruz's resume and Obama's resume are so similar that it is frightening to consider the consequences of making such a mistake again.
Reference is made to a post by  Ronald A. Nelson  Col.USA (Ret), who gave us the following  website to clarify and understand the definition of a "natural born citizen" as defined in the Constitution.  
The Citizenship provisions of the Constitution are set forth in the 14th  Amendment. The  methods for amending the Constitution are set forth in Article V; and Congress may not amend the Constitution by making a law which redefines terms set forth in the Constitution!
Under a true interpretation of the 14th Amendment,  neither Cruz nor Obama meet the definition of natural born citizens, because one of their parents was subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign land at the time of their births.  Kenya in Obama'' case, and Cuba in Cruz's case. "Only someone who is born a citizen, by being born of parents who are already citizens, is eligible to be President". 
Not everyone born here is a "citizen".  The children of documented and undocumented  
immigrants, are not citizens because their parents are subject to the jurisdiction of another country.  Only those whose parents (both parents) are subject to the jurisdiction of the US are citizens at birth. 
"Illegal aliens are not “subject to the jurisdiction of the US” – they are invaders whose allegiance is to the Country they left".
Under a true interpretation of the 14th Amendment,  neither Cruz nor Obama meet the definition of natural born citizens, because one of their parents was subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign land at the time of their births.  Kenya in Obama'' case, and Cuba in Cruz's case. "Only someone who is born a citizen, by being born of parents who are already citizens, is eligible to be President". 
"Once we accept that our President need not be a "natural born citizen",   we will have made a major step towards submission to global government. Because then, anybody can be President".
Thank you,  Ronald A. Nelson  Col.USA (Ret), for the above referenced website. 

Views: 2734

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Possibly W. is correct. 

If you accept the fact that it is not the current Constitution that has a problem, but it is the citizens of this country who have a problem.  That problem is compliantly sanctioning ongoing un-constitutional actions taken frequently by Congress and the President. In short none are upholding their oath of office and there is no accountability demanded.

If you do not fix that problem with this Constitution what is going to change with another one? 

In fact there is an old quotation attributed to one of the framers that goes something like this:  This constitution is appropriate for a moral and religious society but it will be inadequate for any other. Maybe that is the problem.

C Rush


I just finished reading your draft of amendments.   They would provide an excellent starting point if the Constitution it-self were the real problem.

As you know I believe the real problem is different.  This country's leaders at both the state and federal levels are not following the existing ground rules (as established by the Constitution) and the general public is not holding those breaking the law accountable for their actions.  

The fear I have is that this same attitude will rule the day in any COS.  And, what we have to loose is the Constitution and this country's connection to it's founding principles.  Obviously, I believe the risk is not worth the reward.

To me a far less riskier strategy would be to take one of your proposed amendments (you choose) and try to sheppard it thru the existing amendment process.  Then evaluate your success.  If it were me I would start with the Article 3 changes you suggested; less the requirement that judges must be lawyers.

Even better might be an aggressive movement to gain public support for holding elected officials accountable to their oath of office.  The impeachment process!

C Rush

Not exactly Oren. What Iam saying is that we must have real leverage before we roll the dice. Maybe, like, control of the rules of the game ?

In simplicity, a controlling number of states which are held by REAL Constitutional conservatives.

Until there is a radical change in the mentality of the congress, which will not happen in one election cycle of of either house of congress.

The greedsters we are dealing with used to be satisfied with having control of a Senatorial majority until they worked it down to just the Senate leadership.

Then, knowing that they could not possibly control the number of people changes in the House to control it, they applied the same logic to the House.

At this time, the President is the ONLY one who can possibly road block the Congressional agenda.

The Presidents authority lies in the veto pen, Executive Orders and as Commander in Chief, plus, the Attorney General and the authority over the cabinets, and bureau's.

The DHS comes to mind first, then ATF, FBI, and the rogue CIA.

All very powerful, I think you would agree.

Oren, my whole point there is that, I can not imagine a COS even happening before we have a new president in office, so, in the meanwhile, to stave off the agenda of the anti Constitutional efforts of the congress and still get something done, this is the arsenal of the new president. Once his Attorney General is in place we can prosecute the leadership scum in the congress. And that will be the beginning of the recovering of Constitutional government.

Oren, I am in total suport of Trump./ When I speak of a new president, that is who Iam refering to. I guess I should have been specific.

But, unless we get the president we want, I believe that even if there is a COS, it will not change a thing.

To all concerned about the possibility of a COS, the very thought of two of the worst sociopaths in our lifetime, David Rockefeller and George Soros promoting the push for a COS is about the biggest red flags I have seen facing our Constitution in the over two hundred years of our Republic.

Before I personally will feel comfortable in opening the door to the Constitution I would have to see a dramatic return of patriotism in the whole country or at least enough to guarantee control the political out come of such a venture.




Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Joe Biden Vows: Give Taxpayer-Funded Obamacare To All Illegal Aliens In U.S.

Former Vice President and 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidate Joe Biden is vowing to give Obamacare, funded by American taxpayers, to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the United States.

During an interview with Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart, Biden forgot that Obamacare technically bans illegal aliens from enrolling in healthcare plans — although illegal aliens are still able to obtain subsidized and free healthcare at Americans’ expense — and promised that under his plan, all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens would be able to get Obamacare.

The exchange went as follows:

DIAZ-BALART: When I … NBC moderated that first debate with you, I didn’t … I don’t recall a clear answer, under your plan should … would the 11, 12 million undocumented immigrants that live in the United States, that have been here many for generations, would they have access …


DIAZ-BALART: — to health insurance.

BIDEN: Yes, they … if they can buy into the system like everybody else.

DIAZ-BALART: Because you know, in [Obamacare] they can’t.

BIDEN: Yeah. Yeah, I know. Well they can, that’s my point. They continue to be able to do that.

DIAN-BALART: They cannot under the ObamaCare.

BIDEN: Well and that’s my point, they will though. They will be able to buy into … [illegal aliens] would be able to buy in, just like anyone else could.

Biden joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg — among other 2020 Democrats — in committing to forcing American taxpayers to pay for healthcare for illegal aliens who arrive in the U.S.

Already, due to loopholes, American taxpayers are spending nearly $20 billion every year to provide illegal aliens with subsidized healthcare, emergency room visits, and other health services.

Under the 2020 Democrats’ plan to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare to all illegal aliens living in the U.S., Americans would be billed potentially $660 billion every decade just to cover the costs. Other research has found that the plan would cost Americans at least $23 billion every year.

As Breitbart News has reported, experts have said that giving taxpayer-funded healthcare to effectively all foreign nationals who can make it to America’s borders would drive “strong incentives for people with serious health problems to enter the country or remain longer than their visas allow in order to get government-funded care.”

Despite 2020 Democrats’ continued push for taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal aliens, American voters are overwhelmingly opposed to the plan. The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey revealed that the healthcare-for-illegal-aliens plan is the least popular policy position, with opposition from 62 percent of U.S. voters.

Similarly, a CNN poll from July discovered that 63 percent of likely swing voters oppose providing healthcare to illegal aliens, along with nearly 6-in-10 of all likely U.S. voters and 61 percent of moderates. A Rasmussen Reports survey also found that likely voters, by a majority of 55 percent, oppose giving healthcare to even the most low-income illegal aliens.

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service