THE SCARIEST THING ABOUT LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 
Believe me, it’s not the easiest thing in the world to narrow down all the scary things about those on the Left to a single item. But when I saw Rep. scum-Adam Schiff exit the meeting where the Republican members of an intelligence committee voted to release a memo listing the unconstitutional activities of liar-nObama’s FBI and Justice Department during the 2016 presidential campaign, and heard scum-Schiff claim the memo was merely a partisan distraction to divert our attention from Trump’s collusion with Russia, I decided that the way in which Democrats ignore obvious facts is perhaps the single most repulsive thing about them.
Even though they all swore an oath to abide and to protect the U.S. Constitution, they stood by and allowed liar-nObama to subvert it by granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens even after he had declared on 25 separate occasions that he lacked the constitutional authority to do so, and then left it to Trump to clean up the mess.
These days, with every hour bringing forth evidence that a cabal of high-ranking members of the FBI and the Justice Department have dedicated themselves to undermining a duly-elected President, people like clown-Schumer, Pulosi, scum-Durbin and Blumenthal insist it’s much ado about nothing. They’re like brats on a schoolyard covering their ears and humming, incessantly repeating: “Can’t hear you!”
* On the other hand, if you’re a conservative, liar-Hillary Clinton continues to be the gift that keeps on giving.  After spending months blaming everyone in the universe for her loss to the Trumpster, she is back to portraying herself as Wonder Woman, the Greatest Feminist who ever lived, the breaker of glass ceilings, the protector of all women everywhere.
Well, maybe not everywhere. She never spoke up on behalf of the downtrodden women of the Muslim world, especially when she was the beneficiary of Middle East bribes to her family’s Foundation.
She is, in fact, the single biggest enabler of boorish men in America. For openers, there’s her husband, who put grease on his zipper, so he didn’t have to waste any time getting out of his own pants and into some woman’s.
Then there’s her good friend and political ally, Harvey Weinstein, who, even prior to the recent expose, was as well-known for his abuse of women as he was for his movies. Even after legions of women had come forward to testify to his swinish behavior, Mrs. liar-Clinton was reluctant to speak ill of her financial benefactor.
Now, it comes out that back in 2008, when liar-Hillary Clinton was waging a battle for the party nomination, she was told that a senior male advisor had been making life intolerable for a female underling, and instead of firing Burns Strider, demoted the young woman.
And still, millions of American women swear allegiance to her. But, I suppose it shouldn’t come as too big a surprise in a world in which those on the Left believe liar-nObama was a better president and a more honorable man than Trump, that Bill Maher makes sense and that people like Joy Behar, Stephen Colbert and Whoopi Goldberg, are both funny and politically perceptive.
* When Robert Mueller kicked off his investigation, he was supposed to get to the bottom of the charge, based we now know on a phony dossier bought and paid for by liar-Hillary Clinton’s campaign, that Trump or his advisors had colluded (I love that word) with the Russkies.
I keep waiting for someone on the right side of the aisle to ask the Democrats when it was exactly that Russia became our archenemy. I know it was some time after 2012 because liar-nObama mocked Mitt Romney for suggesting during a debate that Russia was America’s major geopolitical threat in the world.
I also know it came after that because both liar-nObama and his Secretary of State had been playing footsies with the Russians for a number of years, during which time liar-nObama promised to be increasingly flexible towards Russia, leaving many of us to wonder how he would manage that, inasmuch as he had already stepped aside and allowed Putin to gobble up Crimea, invade Ukraine and send troops into Syria to protect Iran’s puppet, Bashar al-Assad.
In the meantime, Mrs. liar-Clinton turned over a sizable amount of America’s uranium deposits to, of all places, Russia.
Getting back to Robert Mueller aka James Comey’s best friend, if the rumors are true, he’s nosing around everything Trumpian, including his deportment in nursery school.
To me, it would appear that Mueller has failed to find anything connecting Trump and his closest advisors to Russia, and now, like a D.A. who got an indictment for murder against an innocent party, decides midway through the trial to pursue a conviction for driving with an expired license, just so it won’t be a total loss.
* It seems that the French Air Force has trained four golden eagles to intercept and destroy suspicious drones in the area of the presidential palace and restricted military sites.
They were trained, as birds of prey always are, with food.  Bring home a drone in its talons and they get fed.
Although the eagles include a female, they have been named d’Artagnan, Athos, Porthos and Aramis, as an homage to “The Three Musketeers.”
Apparently, the birds have been outfitted with mittens made of leather and Kevlar to protect them from the blades of the drones. It hasn’t been reported whether the birds have been supplied with little white flags in case they ever happen to encounter German drones.
* Someone told me that Ann Coulter said that the Democrats treat black people like the wife who will iron their husband’s short for a date with his mistress. I apologize if my informant got it wrong, but that would better describe the behavior of blacks towards Democrats, who, after all, consistently display contempt for the black drudge sitting at home, sewing his socks, while he pursues the hot Latina number, pledging amnesty and citizenship the way a sugar daddy bargains for the favors of a chorus girl with furs and diamond necklaces.
*  Speaking of immigration, Dick Frohman, who calls Indian Wells, CA, home for some inexplicable reason, sent me a copy of Zambia’s Immigration Policy.
It seems that if you’re considering moving to that African nation, they want you to know that “An immigrant to Zambia must have a contribution to make in the form of skill, profession or capital that would be of benefit to the people of Zambia.”
Moreover, “An immigrant should not deprive a citizen of Zambia of employment; neither should he be a charge on the state.  He must have the means with which to support himself and his dependents in Zambia.”
And, finally, “An immigrant intending to settle in Zambia must be in possession of an entry permit.”
In some ways, it would seem that when we demean other countries, it’s a case of the pot calling the kettle a shithole. 
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 

Views: 38

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

THE SCARIEST THING ABOUT LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 
Is
Will It Change?

Are you sure about that

THE SCARIEST THING ABOUT LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 
I really can not wait to go back to war against the UK.
I would sign back just for the chance to see
The United Nations Nuked
and this Bitc*
 The Queen Of England
In Prison

Nope, hanio queen of scum

THE SCARIEST THING ABOUT LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 

true

THE SCARIEST THING ABOUT LIBERALS
by Burt Prelutsky
If you want to Comment directly to Burt Prelutsky, please mention my name Rudy. burtprelutsky@icloud.com 

sicking

yes

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service