The original "First Amendment" Your Right To Financial Freedom

The greatest barrier for citizens to retain their wealth and for our nation’s economic growth is the income tax!

What is wealth, where does it come from? Politicians and so called economic experts would have us believe that big businesses or big government is source of wealth.

THEY ARE WRONG, the source of our wealth comes from the energy, ideas and hard work of our citizens. Our ancestors worked with their minds, backs and hands to forge our nation; our blood, sweat and tears built the wealth of our nation.

Businesses don’t start businesses, governments don’t start businesses… citizens start businesses! 

Our forefathers signed the Declaration of Independence and for eight years our ancestors fought the king of England; sacrificing their lives so fellow citizens could live free from unfair taxes and tyranny.

It was our ancestors that fought and bled on the battlefields, not big business, not big government. We created the government, by the people, for the people.

Then in 1913, our politicians decided to create the income tax. Unknowingly, betraying the American citizens with Article 16, the Amendment giving the government the right to take our wealth… the income tax!

The government should have no rights, only citizens!

The 16th Amendment turned out to be our nation’s Frankenstein monster; an out of control tax system that targeted citizen’s hard-earned money. A tax system that would be the destruction of personal wealth and privacy!

This amendment enslaves citizens by taking an unfair amount of our wealth; tax paying citizens are now the servants, working for the government.

When the government controls our wealth, they control us.

Through income taxes we are oppressed and in fear of the government, creating the unintended tyranny, even politicians and IRS employees are afraid of this monster. 

Many families after paying state and federal taxes, are robbed of their wealth, paying 30, 40%, 50% or more of their hard-earned income.

Views: 82

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You can say that again. I am one who considers herself the target of the IRS, forced to turn over income from inheritance, for the rest of my natural life.

As a True "Tea Party" patriot, I think income taxes are the most serious problem our nation faces. Please take 5 minutes to review ONE TAX FOR ALL a national sales tax that eliminates income taxes. (it does not require sign up or money, just personal action) and if you agree with it please send in on.

The real tax revolution starts with us the citizens, not our politicians.

 Maybe, but first, with no exceptions, President Trump has to remove the privet owned corporate companies of the Rothschild Family of the IRS- UK, and Oh !!! by the way this includes the Federal Reserve.

 Now unless some do not know it, it has been expose nation wide and a matter a fact world wide, who owns the IRS and the Federal Reserve.

 Then we can talk about  this tax.

LOL Tif

What needs to happen is just what you wrote.

It is pure prejudice and discrimination, (and social engineering us into a nation of lazy curs)—imho, to pick winners and losers to pillage or reward.  Trump's plan to let a bunch of people skate on taxes is not at all what he should be doing. As far as that idea goes, it means that as a single, white woman who is self-supporting, I do not receive the benefits that:

DACA recipients receive—
Mothers who have more children than they can afford, receive—
Certain races/ethnicities receive—and that  includes not only blacks but the multitude of Arabs/Muslimes who own gas stations and get tax benefits for 5 years then turn it over to another family member, then 5 years later, turn it back over to the 1st one, etc., etc.—I do not get any of those wonderful large tax benefits that they gratefully receive (sarc)—
Any member of congress, who receives lifetime fortunes while lying, cheating, harassing, selling/giving information so buddies can also make the millions, and all the rest that they do, including paying off women they have done things to. I do not have access to secret funds to pay for my life, either. And remember, they also at one point and maybe still do, have access to loans that somehow never get paid back. And that little secret was going on when I was a kid. My dad knew about it.

NOPE, I get none of these benefits. And so, the founders intended something far different, something called equal rights under the law, and they certainly did not intend for direct taxation or taxation on inheritance to occur.

Makes me sick.

This DACA, dad has a file thats all locked up, no one is allowed to see it, this makes me Hmmm?, want to go digging around on its foundation and who the founders are?

file/362a/07/date-2012/server/09

Ahhh? Jean,

 The file was opened to me I can not share some of the documents, according to other reports, DACA Legislation, is stated a little different from the UK United Nations.

 The US Media Gov. Files states a birth time line, but in a bitter dispute between Trump and the UN, the UN wants 800,000 new migrants in the USA every year. The argument of the debate was undocumented migrants.

 I have a lot to read, and I can type in from the documents, its something that is not known as well as those that pushed it through, and some will be surprised of how many Republicans voted for DACA.

 But this name will not be a surprise,the George Soros Foundation.

No, not a surprise in any of your statements. Soros. UN, Republicans. They are all united in one global front.

Yes I do have a surprise, a real nifty one, blog coming up in about two minutes if the internet don't crash.

Thank you for sharing this, President Trump, from what I have read is working on it. The IRS Scandals are still in our face.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service