The original "First Amendment" Your Right To Financial Freedom

The greatest barrier for citizens to retain their wealth and for our nation’s economic growth is the income tax!

What is wealth, where does it come from? Politicians and so called economic experts would have us believe that big businesses or big government is source of wealth.

THEY ARE WRONG, the source of our wealth comes from the energy, ideas and hard work of our citizens. Our ancestors worked with their minds, backs and hands to forge our nation; our blood, sweat and tears built the wealth of our nation.

Businesses don’t start businesses, governments don’t start businesses… citizens start businesses! 

Our forefathers signed the Declaration of Independence and for eight years our ancestors fought the king of England; sacrificing their lives so fellow citizens could live free from unfair taxes and tyranny.

It was our ancestors that fought and bled on the battlefields, not big business, not big government. We created the government, by the people, for the people.

Then in 1913, our politicians decided to create the income tax. Unknowingly, betraying the American citizens with Article 16, the Amendment giving the government the right to take our wealth… the income tax!

The government should have no rights, only citizens!

The 16th Amendment turned out to be our nation’s Frankenstein monster; an out of control tax system that targeted citizen’s hard-earned money. A tax system that would be the destruction of personal wealth and privacy!

This amendment enslaves citizens by taking an unfair amount of our wealth; tax paying citizens are now the servants, working for the government.

When the government controls our wealth, they control us.

Through income taxes we are oppressed and in fear of the government, creating the unintended tyranny, even politicians and IRS employees are afraid of this monster. 

Many families after paying state and federal taxes, are robbed of their wealth, paying 30, 40%, 50% or more of their hard-earned income.

Views: 80

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You can say that again. I am one who considers herself the target of the IRS, forced to turn over income from inheritance, for the rest of my natural life.

As a True "Tea Party" patriot, I think income taxes are the most serious problem our nation faces. Please take 5 minutes to review ONE TAX FOR ALL a national sales tax that eliminates income taxes. (it does not require sign up or money, just personal action) and if you agree with it please send in on.

The real tax revolution starts with us the citizens, not our politicians.

 Maybe, but first, with no exceptions, President Trump has to remove the privet owned corporate companies of the Rothschild Family of the IRS- UK, and Oh !!! by the way this includes the Federal Reserve.

 Now unless some do not know it, it has been expose nation wide and a matter a fact world wide, who owns the IRS and the Federal Reserve.

 Then we can talk about  this tax.

LOL Tif

What needs to happen is just what you wrote.

It is pure prejudice and discrimination, (and social engineering us into a nation of lazy curs)—imho, to pick winners and losers to pillage or reward.  Trump's plan to let a bunch of people skate on taxes is not at all what he should be doing. As far as that idea goes, it means that as a single, white woman who is self-supporting, I do not receive the benefits that:

DACA recipients receive—
Mothers who have more children than they can afford, receive—
Certain races/ethnicities receive—and that  includes not only blacks but the multitude of Arabs/Muslimes who own gas stations and get tax benefits for 5 years then turn it over to another family member, then 5 years later, turn it back over to the 1st one, etc., etc.—I do not get any of those wonderful large tax benefits that they gratefully receive (sarc)—
Any member of congress, who receives lifetime fortunes while lying, cheating, harassing, selling/giving information so buddies can also make the millions, and all the rest that they do, including paying off women they have done things to. I do not have access to secret funds to pay for my life, either. And remember, they also at one point and maybe still do, have access to loans that somehow never get paid back. And that little secret was going on when I was a kid. My dad knew about it.

NOPE, I get none of these benefits. And so, the founders intended something far different, something called equal rights under the law, and they certainly did not intend for direct taxation or taxation on inheritance to occur.

Makes me sick.

This DACA, dad has a file thats all locked up, no one is allowed to see it, this makes me Hmmm?, want to go digging around on its foundation and who the founders are?

file/362a/07/date-2012/server/09

Ahhh? Jean,

 The file was opened to me I can not share some of the documents, according to other reports, DACA Legislation, is stated a little different from the UK United Nations.

 The US Media Gov. Files states a birth time line, but in a bitter dispute between Trump and the UN, the UN wants 800,000 new migrants in the USA every year. The argument of the debate was undocumented migrants.

 I have a lot to read, and I can type in from the documents, its something that is not known as well as those that pushed it through, and some will be surprised of how many Republicans voted for DACA.

 But this name will not be a surprise,the George Soros Foundation.

No, not a surprise in any of your statements. Soros. UN, Republicans. They are all united in one global front.

Yes I do have a surprise, a real nifty one, blog coming up in about two minutes if the internet don't crash.

Thank you for sharing this, President Trump, from what I have read is working on it. The IRS Scandals are still in our face.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service