The last white man standing, by anti- NWO, people all ways united in the common goal in respect of life.

Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed), Nonprofits & Activism

The Last White Man Standing by anti- NWO- YouTube

Views: 98

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wow...:)

 Its not a wow video, it is really good. So who is your new friend?

Yes Tiffany, I also want to know who your new friend is? I understand once youtube deleted the family run network, several people have stepped forward, including me.

Our eyes are open and what we see is chaos and dissolution on the horizon... this NEW DREAM that our youth have embraced is not a path to a tranquil nation... nor does it provide the basis for our common defense or promote the general welfare... NO! 

This new dream is a nightmare... leading to the dissolution of the United States... it is a dream based on the false premise that all cultures and lifestyles are valuable and lawfully permissible... NOT. It is taking us down a path of conflict and is dividing America into groups by race, creed, religion, sex, and social economic class.  Pitting each class as victims of the other... creating conflict and revolution on a grand scale. 

Its goal... the fundamental transformation of America... the destruction of our Constitutional Republic 

The old scrolls sent to Tif by Rosie, that man is to worship man, and not God, right now I would say Tif is crossed eyed over this, the old scrolls of the Books of the Talmud, to tell you the truth, I fell as if they are a half a bubble off plum.

 We will talk later.

Like all ancient religions... there are many texts and scrolls that were never cannon... or actual mainstream doctrine... there were liars then as there are now.  That is why translations of originals get corrupted and whole denominations spring up among the congregations of men.

Twisting words started in the Garden of Eden with Lucifer deceiving Eve with misquoted words and promises of more than one is entitled to receive. 

The very first Books of the Talmud, the first edition were/was edited twice. It was not only a must, but it will be known what the occult was that God challenged.

 I should of mailed out them edited scripts long ago.

Which Talmud are you referring to... the Babylonian or Jerusalem? Both have been edited... the Babylonian was edited at least two times.

The Babylonian Talmud and the Jerusalem (Palestinian) Talmud are two different texts. The Talmud consists of the Mishnah (compiled in Galilee ~200 CE under Rabbi Judah the Prince) and the Gemara (commentary on the Mishnah). These commentaries existed separate from one another. It was expedient to consolidate the commentaries into one legal document. There existed a school in Israel and a school in Babylonia. They compiled and arranged the Gemara differently. They produced two different Talmuds, consisting of the Mishnah and different Gemara. The Jerusalem Talmud was completed by 400 CE. The Babylonian Talmud is longer, and was completed around 500 CE. The Babylonian Talmud is the version most commonly utilized in Judaism.

The Babylonian Talmud was completed in Babylonia, not Europe. The compilation was begun by Ravina I and Rav Ashi. Rav Ashi completed the core Talmud by his death in 427 CE. Maimonides writes in his introduction to his Mishneh Torah:
Ravina and Rav Ashi were the final generations of the Sages of the Talmud. Rav Ashi composed the Babylonian Talmud in [Babylonia] approximately one hundred years after Rabbi Yochanan composed the Jerusalem Talmud. The intent of both the Talmuds is to elucidate the words of the Mishnah, to explain its deeper points, and [to relate] the new matters that were developed by each court from the era of [Rabbi Judah the Prince] until the composition of the Talmud.

However, it is generally agreed that although the majority of the work may have been completed by Rav Ashi, further editing was required to produce the text we would recognize as the Talmud. This was completed by the following generations by around the year 500 CE in the land of Babylonia. This is when the Talmud can be considered complete. However, it is often accepted that the later few generations of scholars in Babylonia did some minor editing and clarification (sort of like issuing a revised edition of an already completed text). Their contributions happened before around 600 CE.

So, there you have it, the Babylonian Talmud is the product of the land of Babylonia; the Jerusalem Talmud is the product of the land of Israel.

To push the war between man and the NWO is their goal, from now to the next 9 years, thing will grow. They state they will win, there is no evidence of this. The 1% against 1 billion lives world wide, it would be very foolish to even consider that they will win.

No one wins should WAR become the main vehicle used by the Left to achieve power...

Scripture tells us 1/3rd of the Earth's population will perish in the coming conflicts... Chaos and famine, rummors of wars and wars will abound.  None of this is good and no one wins under such a scenario.  In fact, God will use these days to demonstrate just how foolish it is to put one's trust in mankind... Openly, contrasting the Love of God with the evil nature of mankind and those who oppose God...

See: Rev 9:18  "A third of mankind was killed by the three plagues of fire, smoke, and brimstone that proceeded from their mouths."

In fact, it gets so bad If those days are not cut short nobody would be saved. But for the sake of the elect, those days will be shortened...  See: Matthew 24:22 " ...
https://www.biblehub.com/matthew/24-22.htm

"And if those days were not shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened..."

Want to bet?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Robert Ariail

Political Cartoons by Chip BokThe cartoonist's homepage, pnj.com/opinion

ALERT ALERT

YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’

BONUS VIDEO

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service