The Jew: CEO Mark Zuckerberg Facebook Pushing "Holocaust Denial Laws in America"

 WASHINGTON -- Facebook is making a free speech argument to defend its policy of tolerating Holocaust denial posts on its platform.

 The tech company allows "inaccurate" information to remain on the site that does not cross into the realm of hate speech, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, said earlier this month in an interview with Recode. That policy was underscored by several other Facebook executives in recent days.

 But Paul Packer, chairman of the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad, confronted the company's leadership last week over the policy, sending the company a pointed letter and receiving Facebook's vice president of global public policy for a contentious meeting.

 Holocaust denial is a crime in Germany and a crime in France– we know its blocked in those countries by Facebook," where they geotag posts, Packer told The Jerusalem Post after the meeting. 

 He questioned why Facebook would not replicate the policy in the United States. "It has no place in America," he added, "to rewrite history."

https://www.jpost.com/International/Holocaust-denial-is-not-illegal...

 The list of countries that the United nations pushed the laws into.

Holocaust deniers complain about their valid, researched, and not at all racist opinions bullsh*** being outlawed in several countries.  Over 179 countries prohibited telling the truth.

 Ok they will push this crap in America, their is to much evidence to support WW2 was because of the greed of banking.

 6 million murdered in the German camps, according to Poland it went from 4 million to 1.5 million.

Now according to a census, there was only 16 million Jewish people in that area.

And 6 million were in the German camps.

 Ok its like this, 6 million Jews murder in the camps this was according to them.

According to Wikipedia, millions of Jews died in the camps from typhus. And Russia used typhus as a biological weapon in WW2.

 This is all based on facts. Wikipedia, million of prisoners from typhus in the German camps.

 Further noted about typhus, according to Wikipedia.

 I am at my wits end dealing with the lies about World War Two, and I will be da****ed it the Jew of Mark Zuckerberg Facebook, is going to school American children over a lie.

 So can anyone file in the blanks on this BLOG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 I have a complete list of all the camps, took a hour to build it.

Views: 158

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.... Hitler was the enemy of Jews... Islam saw Naziam as their friend... only until they become the dominant social force and then they will turn on Nazis.

Operation "Groza" Soviet Invasion of Western Europe, July 6, 1941, history coming up very soon. And all the treaties violated by Russia.

 And you will not be able to twist that up...:)

Rewriting the history of the Russo-German campaigns in WW-2 is now a NEW WORK in progress. Ever since Viktor Suvorov's Book 'Ledokol' was reviewed in the Journal of Historical Review, (JHR) (Nov.-Dec. 1997), Russian historians have been very busy rewriting history... Some would say reinventing history.  This new version focuses on what the Russian historians claim to be the many myths, legends, and fantasies of the war between Communism and National Socialism (WW-2).

The debate on how the new version of history should read involves two primary views. The first asserts that the Soviet Union had no aggressive designs against Germany or Europe and was unprepared for war, while the second maintains that Stalin and the Red Army indeed had plans for a surprise attack against Germany and Europe, but were beaten to the punch by Hitler... and operation Barbarossa the invasion of the Soviet Union. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa

The first view contends that Stalin had decapitated the Red Army purging many high-ranking officers and was not preparing for a major war.. This group takes the traditional historic view, that Stalin he trusted Hitler, believing the Führer would never deliberately initiate a two-front war. The first view blames Stalin for Germany's deep advance into Russian territory and the loss of millions of its people. This view is shared by many, regardless of political leanings.

The alternate or second view is based on a REVISED ANALYSIS of history by Russian military historians, as well as several Germans (See the review of Topitsch's Stalin's War in JHR, [Summer 1988]). They now argue that Stalin did not trust Hitler; that Stalin had, ordered a plan for a surprise offensive, with the ultimate goal of establishing Communism in Europe.  They foolishly contend that it was the USSR, not Germany, was better prepared for war. They even suggest that Stalin's purges of the leadership in the Military actually improved the Red Army, ridding it of the heavy-handed political commissars, most of whom were Trotskyite thugs.

The whole enterprise is engaged in REVISIONIST HISTORY shenanigans... Operation Groza existed before Hitler actually invaded the Soviet Union.  However, it was merely a contingency plan to be used should Hitler violate the non-aggression pack that existed between the two nations.  Any histrionics between today's Communist and the National Socialist... Nazi holdovers is spin... propaganda to shed a more favorable light on Hitler and his Nazi Party.

This discussion would not be complete without considering the German plans for Russia and the historical record of the broken non-agression pack and other strategic and trade agreements Hitler made with Stalin before invading the Soviet Union.  What follows is a brief summary of those acts and the result.

Operation Barbarossa (German: Unternehmen Barbarossa) was the code name for the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union, which started on Sunday, 22 June 1941, during World War II. The operation put into action Nazi Germany's ideological goal of conquering the western Soviet Union so as to repopulate it with Germans. The German Generalplan Ost aimed to use some of the conquered as slave labour for the Axis war effort, to acquire the oil reserves of the Caucasus and the agricultural resources of Soviet territories, and eventually to annihilate the Slavic peoples and create Lebensraum for Germany.[22]

In the two years leading up to the invasion, Germany and the Soviet Union signed political and economic pacts for strategic purposes. Nevertheless, the German High Command began planning an invasion of the Soviet Union in July 1940 (under the codename Operation Otto), which Adolf Hitler authorized on 18 December 1940.

Over the course of the operation, about three million personnel of the Axis powers—the largest invasion force in the history of warfare—invaded the western Soviet Union along a 2,900-kilometer (1,800 mi) front, with 600,000 motor vehicles and over 600,000 horses for non-combat operations. The offensive marked an escalation of World War II, both geographically and in the formation of the Allied coalition including the Soviet Union.

For More See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n6p59_Michaels.html

He he, ha ha, well free speech applies, and I have my own links not written by the little D elite...:)

Yes, we know that you have YOUR OWN LINKS... and we also know that YOU HAVE YOUR OWN VERSION OF HISTORY...

So does the Rothschild system....:) and I just wish all of them were dead...:)

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service