The Congress exists because of the Constitution... the Constitution exists because of the Militia and an armed People. The rule of law is secured by a proper and functioning militia... See: Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 14 and 15. To this end, the Militia must be armed with the weapons necessary to secure the Law and with it... the cause of liberty.

The Militia is present to enforce the law... against enemies of the People. The 2nd Amendment was established to institutionalize the Militia and to ensure the People's right to be armed as necessary to protect their liberty and property. It is essential, to the maintenance of liberty and the security of property rights, that the freedom of the right to keep and bear arms never be surrendered. It is the right to keep and bear arms that is the linchpin by which the People assert and protect their inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Tyrants and usurpers always seek to disarm the Militia... an armed People. However, the militia in these United States is part of the Constitution in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 and 16. The Constitution establishes the Militia as an institution of its creation, part of the balance of power, an instrument of the People, too be called forth for three primary reasons: 1) To execute the laws of the land. 2) Too, suppress insurrection. 3) Too, repel invasions. The militia is a permanent Constitutional institution, on an equal status with the Congress, Administration and Federal Courts. In fact, it is the People's guard against a LAWLESS GOVERNMENT. Congress may call the Militia to restore law and order, suppress insurrection and to repel invasions, as it sees fit. The Militia may be used to remove rouge elements within the government, where insurrection and lawlessness are rampant.

The rights of a free people exist only by the exercise of force of arms... the power needed to enforce the laws of the land was to rest primarily with the People and their Militia, not a standing Army or a Police State. It is a free people who establish just governments, which bring equity and order to society. Without power, the People's Militia is incapable of defending liberty or to enforce the rule of law. Tyrants and usurpers whose purpose is to RULE the People, must first disarm them and nullify the Militia; thus an armed tyrant binds the labor and property of a free people to their use and cause. It is an ARMED PEOPLE and their Militia that is a terror to rogue governments and tyrants. Our founders guaranteed the right of the People to keep and bear arms, as part of a greater force for good, the Militia. The Militia is the sword of a free people and the defender of liberty against rogue governments.

The Militia is not the National Guard... it is not an arm of the government. Rather, it is an Armed Citizenry that is the Militia. An organized and unorganized Militia exist, by right of Constitutional and statutory law, in every State of the Union. There corporate body, when properly armed and trained, exist to secure the common liberty of our Nation. Our founding father's understood all governments gravitates toward corruption, that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. They institutionalized the Militia, within the Constitution itself, as the People's means of defense, against a corrupt Government. The Second Amendment guards the People's right to keep and bear arms as part of the Militia. The right to keep and bear arms is the underpinning power of a free People, a Militia, able to defend against the abuses of a rogue government.

Those who attempt to remove the right to keep and bear arms... endanger the balance of Constitutional Power between the People and those who govern. The power of the Militia rests in the right of the people to keep and bear arms. So fundamental to freedom, is the right of self-defense, that our founders ensconced the Second Amendment to guarantee that right against future usurpation by rogue governments. Arms for Hunting and Personal Defense are a bonus benefit of the Second Amendment, not the primary purpose of the Second Amendment. The Constitutional purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure the People's right to an armed Militia; the People's agent to enforce the rule of law, to put down insurrection and repel invasion.

Despots and rogue governments fear an armed People and their Militia... knowing that when the People are armed they have the means and power to establish law and order as they see fit. A rogue government seeks to disarm the People in order to control and subdue the general population. A free people don't fear their government and a fearful people are a people without the means to defend against those who would usurp their liberty by force of arms. Laws are useless without the power to enforce them.
Our Constitution is meaningless if the People lack the power to enforce its law. The People of the United States remain armed for the time being. It is, therefore, imperative that the People remain armed and prepared to defend liberty and the rule of law, thru the force of arms, if they desire to remain free. However, when a history of usurpations and abuses of power, by government, prove to be insurmountable agents, designed to deprive the People of their liberty, it becomes the right, nay the duty, of such a people to cast off the bounds of that rogue government and too establish new guards for their liberty.

That time is rapidly approaching... watch for the tyrants too begin arms confiscation. That will be the call to arms and the sign for mobilizing the People's Militias. Any law or regulation that is contrary to the Constitution has no legal standing. It is only thru the illegal abuse of power that the agents of law enforcement take away the right to keep and bear arms from citizens of the United States. The right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed is the Constitutional law... the supreme law of the land. It is time that the People remind their government of its purpose and too defend their rights under the Constitution to keep and bear arms as they see fit... not as some government agent, illegal law or regulation dictates.

Views: 73

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Most States have provided statutory authority... to create a State's Constitutional Militia.  This Militia is separate from the federalized National Guard. It is the State's own ORGANIZED Constitutional Militia, funded and managed by the various States... that is the Constitutional Militia. 

It is the Constitutional Militia... which holds the power to generate the forces necessary to resist the Federal Government... not the private militias.  Under most conditions, a private militia will eventually be labeled a domestic terrorist organization. It must be sanctioned, under State authority, to avoid such labeling... too legally declare their right to take up arms against rogue governments.

I oppose loose cannon operations... they don't help our situation.  They create more problems than solutions.  Besides being loosely affiliated they run the risk of being labeled SEDITIONIST ... similar to John Brown's Army, an abolitionist group organized just prior to the civil war.

John Brown's Army/Militia, also known as the JBA, was an American terrorist organization created and led by Emile Dufraisne and John Brown... private citizens.  The JBA was based in New York City, New York.   One might find their own private militia labeled accordingly. Don't confuse it with the John Brown militia of the civil war... it was also a private and illegal militia.

See:http://splintercell.wikia.com/wiki/John_Brown%27s_Army  http://johnbrown.org/provisional-army/ ;

Hank...

Independent militia groups run the risk of being labeled seditionist...  The only difference between a private militia and the revolutionary guard in a communist insurgency is one's point of view and statutory authority. 

One man's patriot group may be another's insurgency or terrorist group... Those who have the statutory authority of the government determine which groups are rebels and which are the patriot organizations. 

The Continental Army of our forefathers was considered a rebel terrorist organization by King George... Until they defeated the King they had to operate as criminals... hiding and running from the local authorities and the King's Army. If they had lost the war they would have all been wanted men... subject to being hanged and all of their property would have been forfeited.

As I stated: "One man's patriot group may be another's insurgency or terrorist group..."

However, it is those who have the statutory authority of the government that determines which groups are rebels and which are the patriot organizations. How do you think the current government will define private militas that resist their authority?

Authority, is that what you call IT ? - LMAO at the whole damn system.

Caught On Camera: Satanic Ceremony Speech

Video exposes satanic ceremonial speech in Washington D.C.

This video shows what appears to be a satanic ceremony. According to the video’s description:

This Satanic Ceremony was held at the Capitol, directly accepted and sponsored by the state, protected by Governments, to let them carry this out.

Satanism runs over the world stronger than ever, controlled by the Dark Emperor Satan himself, ruling from the planet Saturn, where the Black Cube has it’s mind-controlling origin and effects upon the people, letting demons out in the world, possessing people, including Those in Power, and turning the World into Blasphemy, Perversion, Lies and Deceit.

Thanks to Illuminati, the Vatican, The Governments, the Elite, and Secret Orders and Societies that controlled us for thousands of years into ancient times of history.

The Satanic Temple of Detroit - The nation's first state-sanctioned Satanic Ceremony in history- YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0r7mb4kj88w

IL IS ALREADY DOING THIS BUT THEIR BILL  HAS TO PASS THEIR SENATE AND W/MANY DEMS I FAEAR IT WILL

THEY DO NOT CARE A RATS BEHIND ABT THE 2ND AMENDMENT, GOD OR AMERICA. 

KIDS ARE BEING TAUGHT HATE OF THIS GREAT NATION AND WE MUST UN-DO THAT IN A HURRY.  TRUTH ABT GUNS TODAY ARE NOT THERE FOR OUR KIDS THE PARKLAND SHOOTING HAS BECOME THE ANTI GUN LEFTS TALKING POINT AND ARE USING KIDS TO DO WHAT THEY WANT.  DAVID HOGG IS MORE THAN WILLING.  

WE MUST STOP THIS NOW VOTE OUT ALL WHO COMPLY W/THIS DISASTER

 Constitutional Militia has its ups and downs, those who keep anonymity, the condition of being anonymous, will be those that will live to defend the Constitution.

 The 21st Century Militia, has become very powerful, united with Anonymous Activist, or hackers.

 To many here sit in silence, analyzing statements, targeting what they consider their enemy. I have all ways stood against Civil War In America. Not anymore, as the system works its self to retake the White House, and all the hashtags, being posted. I just do not see where we must sit in silence and watch all that we understood be erased from time its self.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service