Former FBI Director James Comey is scheduled to testify in front of the Senate Intelligence  Committee this Thursday. The progressive/socialist Democrats will use it as a cudgel against our President no matter what Comey says.

These self same Trump-Russia colluded sycophants are silent on the many incompetencies being shown by the FBI under James Comey. The terrorist cases brought to the FBI under Comey  led to virtually nothing. This is the same FBI that purged all training materials concerning Islam and has ignored organizations such as MOA, commonly called “Jamaat al-Fuqra” and the camps they run throughout the country. (http://intellectualconservative.com/the-enemies-among-us-part-1/  http://intellectualconservative.com/the-enemies-among-us-part-2/)

And they have also refused to investigate terror inciting mosques or even to cut off funding to these mosques. Comey has made a public statement about the FBI investigating ISIS terrorists in all 50 states, and I have to wonder how may will belike Garland Texas, when an FBI agent followed a terrorist to a Pamela Gellar event, and did nothing but drive away when the terrorists was shot by a vigilant local officer. The FBI has been careful about not offending Muslims for too long. The FBI as the principal law enforcement agency in this country can not afford to live under political correctness.

One of the multiple reasons that Comey was fired  was because he continued to keep open an investigation of Russian collusion that has shown no factual basis. Those who condemn this investigation include The New York Times , House Speaker Paul Ryan, Former DNI James Clapper, Rep. Adam Schiff, Senator Dianna Feinstein, Senator Joe Manchin, Senator Chuck Grassley,  and many other on both sides of the aisle.

Other than the entire debacle of the FBI Investigation into Hillary Clinton which led to condemnation by both Republicans and Democrats, there are other questionable actions taken by the former FBI Director. The counter-intel investigation actually started in July of 2016 but was not disclosed to the Congress until March 2017. Comey was aware of the politicization of DNI James Clapper and his use of an intelligence firewall. This is the same DNI who lied to Congress about the extensive collection of metadata on the American People, and along with CIA Director John Brennan admitted to spying on the Senate Intelligence Agency.

The question that Comey should be asked is this. If Comey launched the counter-intel operation in July of 2016, what was the purpose. The only answer that makes sense is the White House and James Clapper knew and were using this investigation for political purposes. Even to this day Comey and his holdovers at the FBI refuse to allow the House Intelligence Community to review documents that may show who the leakers are.

Can anyone explain why in September 2016 Comey received $6 million from Lockheed Martin. Or why Comey is now a board member, director and committee member for HSBC.  Both of these organizations are Clinton Foundation donors. Peter Comey,   James Comey brother, held a senior Director for DLA Piper which Is one of the largest Clinton’s campaign donors and also audited the Clinton Foundation.

James Comey finds himself in an untenable position. Comey or one of his friends in the FBI leaked a memo to the New York Times by reading an excerpt from a memorandum that no one has seen and can not be verified.  Democrats avidly believe that President Trump attempted to coerce the then sitting FBI Director into dropping the Michael Flynn case as purportedly stated in this memo. If that was the case, Director Comey was required by law to inform the Department of Justice. Failure to do so is a felony under Federal law. (18USC4 and 28USC1361)

If the discussion of Flynn did not constitute coercion, then there was no crime. The next step is to see the memo, and perhaps needs to be subpoenaed to do nothing more than to seek the validity of what is in it. If he wants to allege criminality on the part of President Trump, he will find that it will implicate him in malfeasance.

With his meeting with the Senate Intelligence Committee looming, James Comey has now refused formally to answer any questions submitted to him by a bi-partisan group of senators from the Senate Judiciary Committee. Comey is claiming that as a “private citizen” he declines to answer any questions. Perhaps he doesn’t realize that these same questions are what the American are demanding answers for.

The House Judiciary Committee is the government organization responsible for the oversight of the Justice Department and FBI, and yet Comey refuses to answer valid questions or even discuss these questions with the House Judiciary Committee which requested he voluntarily come before the committee.

These questions were provided to Comey in anticipation of his testimony on Thursday:

  1. Did you discuss with anyone outside of the Justice Department and interactions you had with President Trump or Obama?
  2. Did you create any memos about interactions you had during the Obama or Trump administrations with the Deputy Attorney General, Attorney General, or the President regarding the investigations of Trumps associates allege coconnections with Russia or the Clinton E mail investigations?
  3. Have you discussed any such memos or their contents with anyone outside the Justice Department?
  4. Did you copy and share copies of any such memos woth anyone outside the Justice Department?
  5. Have you retained copies of such memos or have access to them?

It would surprise no one if Comey becomes very selective in his responses to the House Intelligence Committee to show a one sided story. It will be difficult to obtain responses to questions such as sharing NSA information with third parties and the  monitoring of attorney-client conversations as exposed by Circa.

Thursday will be interesting. It will be informative to see how Comey responds to questions from those on the committee, and also interesting about how the “Fakestream Media”  spins it. We already know all the progressive/socialist Democrats will pull even the silliest and smallest morsel that they can to bash Trump. The questions that the American people care about are jobs, the economy, and terrorism. Once again this will be blown up to hide the achievements of this administration.  They have every intention of keeping the false narrative of Trump-Russian collusion going until the next election.  It has been proven time again and that it is a false narrative. All the Democrats have agreed that the only narrative needed is “Stop Trump” and that will not be recognized by the American People as moving the country forward.

 

Views: 28

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The only item in here that Comey might not be guilty of is:  rewriting military manuals removing "islamic terrorist" out of all of them. From what I have read, the guilty person who did that was an islamist who was appointed by our dear 0fraud and imposter, who made sure he laced these militant bastards throughout the top levels of our government. I had his name but cannot find my list of all the muslimes that 0 appointed.

Of everything else, he sure is guilty, including the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$that he made off Clinton.

He is a crook and deserves hanging or the firing squad, and I need some target practice. Too many investigations and committees, who don't do a thing. Well, something had better come of this one.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service