Texas law professor calls for repeal of Second Amendment

A professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law claims that the Second Amendmentshould be shelved and replaced with something else.

Professor Mary Margaret Penroserevealed her thoughts at a day-long symposium held Friday at the University of Connecticut School of Law in Hartford, according to The Daily Caller.

Connecticut’s Governor Dannel Malloy delivered the symposium’s opening remarks, the subject of which was the Second Amendment and gun control organized by The Connecticut Law Review.

read more:

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/11/17/texas-law-professor-calls-fo...

Views: 1577

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

   I think we the real back bone of America need to puish for better vetimg of people who come here for what ever reason . It seams that once these people get here they bring all there trash with them the very thing they were trying to get away from but wance here they soon try very hard to puish it in to AMERICAN LAWS. WHEN WILL WE WAKE UP AND STOP HAVING WIDE OPEN ARMS ? OUR WIDE OPEN ARMS WILL SOONER OR LATER DISTROY US . WE NEED KNOW WHO IS WHO BEFOR WE HAND THEM THE KEYS TO OUR PRECIOUS COUNTRY AND GLORIOUS FREEDOM THAT GOES WITH IT . I for one don"t think many we say yes to under stand this . WE AREN'T VETTING THEM WELL ENOUGH FOR WTHAT EVER REASON THERE HERE. There many who come to visit and don"t go home we need to stop this and many other ways people get with out being vetted if we want keep our feedom and country.

This gal lives in Texas? I'm surprised she's still walking around!

repeal obamacare stupid

Anytime this sort of anti Constitutional talk is said on a School Campus, it is NOT Freedom of Speech to REpeal any such law in the Constitution. These are the evil and Enemies of America that need to SHUT UP and warned never to state such idea, because IT IS NOT AN IDEA BUT A ANTI FREEDOM ACT!

PEOPLE what we have here is another TOTAL IDIOT like the one in our house. A&M needs to REMOVE THIS TRASH before  it removes the millions that are donated  to keep it running!

WE also need to REVIEW and RE-WRITE all the BOGUS TRASH that is NOW IN THE TEXT BOOKS---thanks to IDIOTS in TEXAS LIKE THIS ONE---

Let her try. 39 states would have to say yes. I'd like to see her face after that vote.

To be a liberal professor it must require a lot less IQ to get it.  

" THE TREE OF LIBERTY MUST BE REFRESHED FROM TIME TO TIME WITH THE BLOOD OF PATRIOTS AND TYRANTS"
Thomas Jefferson 1787

Wait and see, "We The People"

Better to fight to defend your LIBERTY and possibly die, than do nothing and become a SLAVE to a tyrannical fascist government.

"It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men (in this case a whacked out split tail) in all ages who mean well, but they mean to govern. They PROMISE to be good masters, BUT they mean to be masters."
Daniel Webster

MOLON LABE !!!

I believe Professor Mary Penrose stated that any amendment had to be approved by the House and the Senate...NOPE!

 

She stated that the House and the Senate could give approval to a change in Amendment Two by a 2/3's vote....NOPE!  They can only propose such an amendment.......THE STATES DO THE RATIFYING!

Approval of an Amendment to the Constitution takes approval of 3/4's of the STATE LEGISLATURES or 3/4's of CONVENTIONS IN THE STATES.  Don't college law professors ever read the actual wording in the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

    http://patriotupdate.com/2013/11/repeal-replace-2nd-amendment/

'

Your 100% right Terrence D. i think she got and( F) in Constitutional Law,WOW

Even if they removed the enumeration of the right, the right itself still exists.  The original Constitution had no Bill of Rights. the founders felt that if the constitution was not specifically giving government a power over the people, the government had no right to interfere with the exercise of those God-given rights. 

The Constitution does not "give" us any rights.

Article V - A Successful Amendment – How Will It Work?

When 38(+) State legislatures have approved a request for an Article V Amendment convention, Congress has no choice but to act on the request. They will know that the game is over and they will not fight it, nor will the courts touch the issue. And after the 38(+) States ratify the amendment, it will become the “law of the land”. This will restore America’s foundation - “RULE-BY-LAW” that LIMITS government and “they” can no longer expand and ignore the ACTUAL limits. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service