Image result for you are entering a sharia free zoneOn Wednesday, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law House Bill 45, the “American Laws for American Courts,” which prohibits the state’s courts from using any foreign law in its courts, with specific reference to family courts that involved marriage or parents and children.

The bill, which had five sponsors and twenty-six cosponsors (all Republican), passed the House at the beginning of May and the Senate near the end of May.

Abbott signed the bill into law on June 14, 2017, and it takes effect on September 1, 2017.

Representative Jeff Leach (R-Plano) thanked Abbott and said the bill was a “vitally important bill to further safeguard and protect our Constitutional rights!”

Leach previously introduced a similar bill in the last legislative session, House Bill 562, but it did not successfully pass.

Representative Dan Flynn (R-Canton) was the lead author on the bill. He, too, had introduced unsuccessful legislation that was similar to HB 45 in the past.

While many people commented that the law was frivolous, and to be honest if the courts stuck to American law and didn’t stray from that, they would be correct, Flynn noted that is was not so.

Flynn said that foreign law was being applied in Texas courts concerning a variety of things such as divorce orders, child support, property settlements and sometimes even, spouses enter into agreements to have foreign law applied to their disputes, according to Breitbart.

“My colleagues and I here at the Texas Legislature want to make sure Texas judges never apply foreign law in Texas courts in violation of constitutional rights and the public policy of our state,” said Flynn.

Breitbart reports:

Under HB 45, Texas and U.S. law supersede all other laws. It prevents state judges from applying any foreign law because, in doing so, it infringes upon U.S. and Texas constitutional rights. The bill shields litigants in family law cases “against violations of constitutional rights and public policy in the application of foreign law” under the U.S. and Texas Constitutions, federal and judicial precedent, the Texas Family Code, and the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, among other protections.

HB 45 makes no mention of any particular foreign nation, religion, or cultural practice but clarifies that “foreign law” means a rule, law, or code from a jurisdiction outside of the United States and it shall not override U.S and Texas law or their respective constitutions. It specifies that a “foreign judgment” means a ruling from a court, tribunal, or administrative adjudicator outside U.S. states and territories. The bill underscores that, in the event of any legal conflicts, “federal or state law prevails.”

If you recall, a Sharia tribunal was set up in Texas back in 2015 to deal with some of the family issues under Sharia. They immediately found themselves in trouble with the law for making false claims ab...

When similar legislation came out in 2015 to deal with this issue, Muslims stormed the Irving City Council and were outraged that the ...

As the outrage of the Muslim community grew, Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne said that she was “not going to be bullied,” and would “not be deterred.” Behind those attacks on Van Duyne and others was none other that designated terror group and Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Later that same year, the story broke about Ahmed “the fake clock making boy” Mohamed, which occurred in Irving. The previous year, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah’s former national security adviser and Muslim Brotherhood supporting imam, Mohamed Elibiary, left the administration to work in nearby Dallas at his Freedom & Justice Foundation. This all occurred as an influx of illegal aliens poured across America’s southern border, some of whom we suspect were Islamic jihadis due to previous reports herehereherehere and here.

There is no doubt that Sharia is being pushed to replace the US Constitution among many Is... Even Elibiary has said, “The United States of America an Islamic country with an Islamically com....” To make matters word, Herman Mustafa Carroll, executive director of the Dallas-Fort Worth CAIR branch declared openly, “If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land.”

Interestingly enough, CAIR also attacked HB45 saying, “We believe it prevents Muslims from practicing their faith in areas such as Islamic marriage, divorce, funeral procedures, and civil agreements.”

The Texas Supreme Court must adopt HB 45’s rules by January 1, 2018.

Texas is the twelfth state to enact such legislation. So far Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Washington have all put similar ALAC laws in place.

Sadly, because America has abandoned God and claimed that all gods are equal and allowed the public worship of those gods in the public square, she is reaping the fruit of her idolatry. While I am glad that the law was passed and that people recognize there is a problem there, in my opinion, they are simply applying a band-aid to a gaping wound. We must get back to the principles that established us as a city on a hill in the world and... we must go back to the Bible and the Law of God.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/06/18/texas-governor-signs-anti-s...

Views: 58

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

DAMN.............doesn't that explain it well

The "religion" (lie) of "peace" (lie) strikes (true) again (true).

Daniel Webster's 1828 (the only true dictionary) dictionary describes "religion" as requiring a belief system and a moral compass. Where................is..............the moral code/compass in islime?

I have looked, and I cannot find it.

Related image

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service