Ted Cruz Goes on Attack and Raises Bipartisan Hackles

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, sat silent and satisfied in the corner of the chamber — his voice lost to laryngitis — as he absorbed what he had wrought in his mere seven weeks of Senate service.

Mr. Hagel, a former senator from Mr. Cruz’s own party, was about to be the victim of the first filibuster of a nominee to lead the Pentagon. The blockade was due in no small part to the very junior senator’s relentless pursuit of speeches, financial records or any other documents with Mr. Hagel’s name on them going back at least five years. Some Republicans praised the work of the brash newcomer, but others joined Democrats in saying that Mr. Cruz had gone too far.

Without naming names, Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, offered a biting label for the Texan’s accusatory crusade: McCarthyism.

 

read more:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/us/politics/ted-cruz-runs-counter...

 

Views: 919

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

and maybe thats not a bad thing,,,most of the elected officials in this country are socialist/communists...that is not what this country is about..go get em i say..

 Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, offered a biting label for the Texan’s accusatory crusade: McCarthyism. If it was McCarthyism, Boxer would be one of first on the commie list.

I would rather have McCarthyism than Obamaism!

I just wish that McCarthy had been able to finish what he started. 

Well, the media always thinks that if is not their way is the highway. I hate to break to them, but that is how the truth is brought to light. These senators have dirt on themselves.  The mayority are taking legal payola, so that they can perpetually continue on their seats. That is why it takes a new comer to ask deep probing questions. 

We need more Congressmen likeTed Cruz who have backbone, and won't cringe when a Barbra Boxer makes a fool of herself with name calling.  It strikes me that only the Texans seem to have strong leaders in Congress like Cruz and Stockman.  Also, cudos to Rand Paul of Kentuckey.  None of the wimp RINOS from the NE can even hold up thir own trousers.  What's up with that?

"They'll" get to this new senator and pay him off or threaten him and he'll fall into line just like the rest of the chicken s#*t GOP. We have an ILLEGAL running this Country into the ground and nobody in the government is doing a thing about it.

Sen's Rand Paul and  Ted Cruz are patriots!  Let's hope that they can handle the Heat when the illegal thug in the wh, Obutthead and his henchmen start applying pressure, Chicago-style.  We've already seen what they can do to the likes of Boehner, Issa and Justice Roberts.  We The People are going to be needing solid leadership to go along with our military constituents (Constitutional Patriots like Gen. Boykin, Gen Vallele, Lt. Col. West and North,etc.) when this civil war breaks out.

I will really laugh when Texas and a few other states that have the guts enough to seceed from this so called union now and start their own country based on the bill of rights and constitution and leave the liberals enough rope to hang themselves as a government

The republican astablishment is no better than the democrat astablishment they are both full of old scum bags who have been in office to long they don't care about the people or our country all they care about is themselves and holding on to there positions so they can continue to rape and steal from the American people the new congressman and senators who are conservative are our only chance no one should be able to stay longer than four years butt I think it's to late to much damage has been done now we need to start over and clean out the scum no republicans no democrats like our founding fathers warned us about just representatives for the people who they are supposed to represent

This is why we need more new people with a fresh ways of looking at things !!!

YES AND IF YOU REMEMBER MCCHARTY WAS THE ONLY ONE IN THE SENATE THAT WOULD STAND UP AND SAY HEY WE HAVE COMMUNISTS TRYING TO INFILTRATE AND TAKE OVER THE AMERICAN GOVT.THEY ALL SAID HE WAS CRAZY AND THREW HIM UNDER THE BUS.WELL WELL LOOK WHO HAS COME OUT OF HIDING AFTER ALL THESE YEARS!THE COMMUNISTS THAT WHERE HIDING IN THE CAPITAL UNTILL THEY COULD GET THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER THEIR CONTROL NOW DESTRUCTION IS IN THEIR SITES!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service