As he struts out of the same door whose glass he mistakenly ran into in 2009, Pretend President Barack Hussein Obama is trying to take credit for being “The Father of the Tea Party”.

“Stop, thief, Stop!” and hear the gales of laughter your 11th-hour claim has unleashed across the fruited plains.

This ‘Father of Abysmally Failed U.S. Marxism’, kissin’ cousin to unrepentant domestic terrorist Billy Ayers, Ace in the Hole for rampaging Islamic terrorists, Hillary Clinton’s election stalled Queen Maker, and Valerie Jarrett protegé,  will be duly history-anointed as the ‘Big Daddy of Racial Discord’.

Save for the signature “ums”, “ers” and “ahs” when being showcased by ABC Correspondent George Stephanopoulos, we would have thought he was just kidding.

“I’m the Father of the Tea Party,” the same president, who allowed the term “tea baggers” for TP members and on whose watch the IRS was sicced on the Tea Party, crowed. A dramatic change from his hissy fit back on Sept. 12, 2009 when he flew over the heads of millions of protesters in Washington, D.C., trying desperately to make it seem they weren’t really there.

“As he left Washington this morning aboard the Marine One helicopter, President Obama flew over the crowds forming near the Capitol. But as the protests continued, President Obama’s own rally was already under way in Minneapolis.” (ABC News, Sept. 12, 2009).

read more:

http://canadafreepress.com/article/tea-party-to-obama-youre-not-our...

Views: 626

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

like hell he is

NOT IN YOUR WILDEST DREAMS  !! OBAMA!!!!

Hey flush the toilet on POS ),( 

he has got to be out his freaking mind

Delusional

Well

of course he is the "father" of the Tea Party. That is how he qualifies for the "Distinguished Public Service" medal so recently awarded to him.

RIGHT?

In  a sense he is more like a Godfather of the Tea Party. He made so many bad offers we had to refuse.

grassroots of R party...

TeaParty should have NEVER embraced that label. What a huge mistake, doomed itself to fade away into being no more than merely a faction of the republicans.

On the other hand if the Tea Party did not vote with the Republicans, Hillary Clinton would be moving into the WH again on 20 Jan

voting against Hillary and embracing the label republican are two far different things.

TeaParty lowering it's goals to participating only in the election politics arena, and then embracing only one - either of the establishment party labels, lowered itself into being nothing exceptional at all. Merely a faction of the same ole same ole b.s. of relying only on election politics and politicians to provide solutions, which has proven well throughout history just does NOT happen.

NOTHING has worked for you in this office, weasel!  You are damn sure NOT the TEA PARTY's "Daddy".  Go ask Rick Santelli about that!!!  And he STILL can't say who he is in ONE SENTENCE!!!  Follow the d a m n rules!!!  Useless N****R thinks his admin was "scandal free", and race relations are BETTER NOW than 8 years ago!!!  Even Stephanopoulos almost choked on THAT one.

Marxist ideology and rules for Radicals... use tactics which coopt the enemies policies and success ... too, assume them as their own... of course with a liberal twist.  The left will never engage defeat... they simply retell the story with them emerging as victors... Even when the evidence screams defeat.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Robert Ariail

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

Political Cartoons by Steve Breen

ALERT ALERT

Romney Handed Shock
Defeat By Own State’s GOP

Mitt Romney is back in state politics, this time in Utah instead of Massachusetts. However, conservatives in The Beehive State aren’t exactly warming up to the 2012 Republican standard-bearer quite the way many people expected they would.

After finishing second in votes at the state GOP convention, Romney will now face a primary in his run for the Senate seat being vacated by Orrin Hatch, Fox News reported.

At the convention in West Valley City on Saturday, Romney polled just behind state lawmaker Mike Kennedy.

Kennedy captured 50.18 percent of the delegate vote compared to Romney’s 49.12 percent.

That means the two will face off in a primary on June 26 to determine who will represent the GOP this fall.

Romney, the first Mormon to head a major party ticket, is considered an extremely popular figure in Utah and was widely expected to have an easy path to the upper chamber.

In a hypothetical matchup with Democrat Jenny Wilson, at least one poll showed Romney up by 46 percent. That’s, uh, slightly more than the margin of error.

However, among party loyalists, Romney isn’t exactly viewed with unalloyed fondness.

The 2012 presidential nominee was always known for being decidedly moderate, particularly on issues of immigration and global trade. There was also the fact that he ran a campaign so bumbling that it almost made Michael Dukakis look good.

And then there was Romney’s war of words with Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign, which likely led many to perceive he secretly wished Hillary Clinton would take the Oval Office.

Trump would later consider Romney as a secretary of state pick, although how serious the president-elect was about appointing him is something we’ll likely never know.

While your average Utah Republican is unlikely to let these slights affect their vote, hardcore party activists probably don’t want another RINO who isn’t exactly known for his rapport with the president in the upper chamber of Congress, no matter how famous he may be.

For his part, Romney tried to put a good spin on the humiliation.

“I’m delighted with the outcome. Did very, very well,” he told KSTU. “On to a good, important primary ahead. This is terrific for the people of Utah.”

Dude, you just lost to a guy nobody has ever heard of. However, Kennedy was happy with the results, and unlike Romney, he had good reason to be.

“I’m a candidate with a compelling life story and a unique set of life circumstances I’d like to use to serve the people of Utah,” Kennedy said.

I have no idea what that story or those circumstances are, but I think the key point here is that he’s not Mitt Romney. If he wants to win, that’s pretty much what he should be focusing on. I can see the billboards now. “Mike Kennedy: Not Mitt Romney.” “Mike Kennedy: He didn’t borrow Ward Cleaver’s haircut.” “Mike Kennedy: Because Utah deserves a senator whose favorite food isn’t buttered noodles.”

Utah’s electorate tends to be less conservative than convention-goers, so it’s unlikely that Romney won’t be the GOP nominee for Senate. However, that’s not a 100 percent certainty — and it wouldn’t be the first time he’s lost to a Kennedy.

What do you think?

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service