This week's poll from the Lester & Charlie Institute of Forward Thinking:

Gun sales have spiked since Obama's re-election. Petitions for secession have appeared in all 50 states. Sarah Palin is tweeting like crazy. Citizens with big guns are angry and they're itching for a fight. Is your government ready?

You'll be glad to know it is!

See, a "thought exercise" described in an article published by the non-profit Small Wars Journal (co-written by a retired Army colonel and a Civil War historian) tries to figure out what the federal government should do if, say, the frustrated Tea Party gets a little too caffeinated and forgets that their muskets and tricorne hats are supposed to be props.

What really scares the authors is the possibility that an armed teabagging rebellion wouldn't stand a chance of being dunked by local law enforcement -- because the locals would be too sympathetic to the rebels. Yes, it may sound paranoid. But it turns out that the U.S. Army's operating concept for 2016 to 2028 considers a threat by "radical U.S. citizens operating domestically and abroad" to be highly likely.

Conservatives were outraged that anyone was even considering such a scenario. The Washington Times called it "cartoonish" and "farcical."

We're not so sure. After all, just two years ago in her bid for the U.S. Senate, Nevada Republican Sharron Angle threatened that her criminally insane supporters would resort to "Second Amendment remedies" if the GOP didn't get its way. True, she lost. But not without getting 45 percent of the vote. And we're pretty sure that her 45 percent own a lot of guns.

read more and see their poll:

Be Sure to Read the Comments where you will find struggling attempts at wit like:

Peace, Order, and Good Government
03:01 PM on 01/04/2013
Funny. Yet the guncrazed excuse for the 2nd Amendment is that Americans require these weapons in the event that their government gets overbearing and dictatorial. I'm surprised they've waited this long.

01:46 PM on 01/04/2013
I say, follow the "Gullible Conservatives" with a camera and get them on film at the store with their food stamp card, or the doctor with there medicaid card, at the tax office putting in for a waiver on their property taxes, turning in the application for a Pell Grant, and walking into the Plan Parenthood Clinic.
all hail the French & the Saunders...
01:43 PM on 01/04/2013
here are a few more suggestions for how to stop the impending crush of zombiebaggerz:

- substitute krazy glue for their denture adhesives

- slash the tires on their motorized carts

- offer a huge 2 day sale at Walmart

- substitute valium for.....their other blue pill

- show a weekend marathon of "24"

- tell them the battle plans are online, but they need a secure wi-fi connection AND a password for access

but perhaps the easiest way to quell a TP uprising would be to tell them that General Mitt Romney will be leading their troops...

Views: 871

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

all of you that think this president wont turn this country in to a world war two germany type country you will find that is just what he is doing right now

(reply has been edited to conform to site posting policies)

Hi Alfred, I see your post has been edited, but I agree that the commie, homo, muslim, liar etc etc. is the problem with the society today.  These school, theater, mall shootings are all 0vomits fault.  He should just plan on going back to africa, so he can live his life out in peace.

 sounds like O'craphead learned from the pigeon !!!!   They both act the same.

He (BO) is a pigeon - a Saudi stool, and interpret that any way you like...

  L.B.  .. YOU MEAN LIKE, PIGEON POO, RIGHT !!! Oily sticky poo !!!  got it.

Based on a series of cases in the 1940s and 50s, it is not illegal for Americans to advocate the violent overthrow of the government; it is illegal, however, to advocate immediate action to overthrow the government.

However, I strongly agree that discretion is warranted

Those who banter about direct action may have to be suspected of being agents provocateur.

[. . . For the record, with reference to the domestic terrorism law and other terrorism laws, regulations and executive orders, universally, I do not morally (or otherwise) support acts that are dangerous to human life, violate criminal law and "appear to be intended" to "intimidate or coerce a civilian population" or "influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion . . ."]

gee , thats what the KKK was and you see what it got them .

Thanks Dee, where have you been all day I missed you. Not sure how to take this post,so I'll reply to replies After being here for a few yrs now alot of us know each other, we know where we stand on issues. alfred, my youngest daughter is married to a black man, they have one child my grand daughter to go w/ my other 8 grandkids, I love each of my grandkids the same. I love my daughter her husband deeply. If youve read any of my posts, comments, shares, replies, you know by now where I stand on all issues.  Matt clever talk I have none, anything I say on the net I say. I bow to no man only my Savour Jesus Christ. What plans are you speaking of, I dont write any detailed plans anywhere, I havnt read any plans on here that are illegal. No one on this earth or America, which we are speaking of has done any of that. However sir when did you become the 1st amendment & seemed to change the Constitution. There is Treason & Tyranny in DC which produced Traitors& political WH & Congress & supreme court terrorist. They must be removed from DC by We The People, Sir we have a 2nd Amendment to take care of this, have you read & studied our Constitution, where my friend have you read anything illegal-no where. Now Matt 45 million registered gun owners, millions of hunters, NRA w, 200 pro gun & pro 2nd amendment groups. 3400 Militia groups etc etc who my friend is going to squash, squash, we are well prepared, well trained, well armed, well informed, we have detailed plans, well organized The Constitutional Military, National Guard, & Law Enforcment have joined with us We The People. Our direct communications are not on the net, for anything-never. Matt dont you try & be clever & violate the 1st amendment of We The Peoples FREEDOM OF SPEECH or anything else under our Freedoms & Liberties

Bravo my friend

I wonder what you'd have said if you'd witnessed the Obamanut liberal Irishman (who called me a racist for not voting for Obama) say with liberal tears in his eyes that he and his wife loved their adopted Ethiopian grandchild more than their natural grandchildren.

Now that I have a problem with!  Overcompensation, perhaps... or...or...



The majority of the masses will keep their haeds in the sand and deny that anything like dictatorship will ever happen . But one day they will awaken and find out , it happened and now they can't really do much about it . There is no talking with liberals about it or even trying to convince them . They all live in their little world of denial dispite what is happening right under their noses . God Help Us !




Romney Handed Shock
Defeat By Own State’s GOP

Mitt Romney is back in state politics, this time in Utah instead of Massachusetts. However, conservatives in The Beehive State aren’t exactly warming up to the 2012 Republican standard-bearer quite the way many people expected they would.

After finishing second in votes at the state GOP convention, Romney will now face a primary in his run for the Senate seat being vacated by Orrin Hatch, Fox News reported.

At the convention in West Valley City on Saturday, Romney polled just behind state lawmaker Mike Kennedy.

Kennedy captured 50.18 percent of the delegate vote compared to Romney’s 49.12 percent.

That means the two will face off in a primary on June 26 to determine who will represent the GOP this fall.

Romney, the first Mormon to head a major party ticket, is considered an extremely popular figure in Utah and was widely expected to have an easy path to the upper chamber.

In a hypothetical matchup with Democrat Jenny Wilson, at least one poll showed Romney up by 46 percent. That’s, uh, slightly more than the margin of error.

However, among party loyalists, Romney isn’t exactly viewed with unalloyed fondness.

The 2012 presidential nominee was always known for being decidedly moderate, particularly on issues of immigration and global trade. There was also the fact that he ran a campaign so bumbling that it almost made Michael Dukakis look good.

And then there was Romney’s war of words with Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign, which likely led many to perceive he secretly wished Hillary Clinton would take the Oval Office.

Trump would later consider Romney as a secretary of state pick, although how serious the president-elect was about appointing him is something we’ll likely never know.

While your average Utah Republican is unlikely to let these slights affect their vote, hardcore party activists probably don’t want another RINO who isn’t exactly known for his rapport with the president in the upper chamber of Congress, no matter how famous he may be.

For his part, Romney tried to put a good spin on the humiliation.

“I’m delighted with the outcome. Did very, very well,” he told KSTU. “On to a good, important primary ahead. This is terrific for the people of Utah.”

Dude, you just lost to a guy nobody has ever heard of. However, Kennedy was happy with the results, and unlike Romney, he had good reason to be.

“I’m a candidate with a compelling life story and a unique set of life circumstances I’d like to use to serve the people of Utah,” Kennedy said.

I have no idea what that story or those circumstances are, but I think the key point here is that he’s not Mitt Romney. If he wants to win, that’s pretty much what he should be focusing on. I can see the billboards now. “Mike Kennedy: Not Mitt Romney.” “Mike Kennedy: He didn’t borrow Ward Cleaver’s haircut.” “Mike Kennedy: Because Utah deserves a senator whose favorite food isn’t buttered noodles.”

Utah’s electorate tends to be less conservative than convention-goers, so it’s unlikely that Romney won’t be the GOP nominee for Senate. However, that’s not a 100 percent certainty — and it wouldn’t be the first time he’s lost to a Kennedy.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service