Supreme Court: Obama Had No Constitutional Authority for NLRB Recess Appointments

The Obama Administration took another hit Thursday when the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that his NLRB recess appointments were lacking in Constitutional Authority. 

The Court ruled that the recess appointment powers of the President were limited to high level vacant positions and those positions could be filled by the President as temporary appointments. 

The Justices rejected Obama's assertions that the Senate was in recess when he made his appointments.  The opinion states:

...we find that the pro forma sessions were sessions for purposes of the Clause. First,
the Senate said it was in session. The Journal of the Senate and the Congressional Record indicate that the Senate convened for a series of twice-weekly “sessions”
from December 20 through January 20. 2011 S. J. 923– 924; 158 Cong. Rec. S1–S11. (The Journal of the Senate for 2012 has not yet been published.) And these reports of
the Senate “must be assumed to speak the truth.” Ballin,
supra, at 4.


Second, the Senate’s rules make clear that during its pro forma sessions, despite its resolution that it would conduct no business, the Senate retained the power to conduct business. During any pro forma session, the Senate could have conducted business simply by passing a
unanimous consent agreement.

The Court also addressed political conflict regarding appointments:

....the Recess Appointments Clause is not designed to overcome serious institutional friction. It simply provides a subsidiary method for appointing offi­cials when the Senate is away during a recess.

This Supreme Court opinion reaffirms a lower court ruling:

we conclude that the Recess Appointments Clause does not give the President the constitutional authority to make the appointments here at issue. Because the Court of
Appeals reached the same ultimate conclusion (though for reasons we reject), its judgment is affirmed.


It is so ordered.

The entire Opinion:

Supreme%20Court%20Opinion%20Obama%20Recess%20Appointments.pdf

by:
Dee Lutz
Administrator
Tea Party Command Center

Views: 620

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What about the validity of rulings during this period when 3 of the 5 board members were invalid appointments? Anyone care to hazard an educated guess?

Jay Sekulow said they were ruled nullified.. he didn't say whether that was specifically ruled in text or is an obvious residual effect.

Justice delayed....is justice denied.....  too little   too late.

Decisions of such magnitude...should be acted on summarily - for any damage done by the

false appointments could add up to total destruction or a degree thereof by the time the Nine (9) act.

This is not even a "hopeful"  plea. 

Finally they do something right for America.

Halleujah! The Supreme Court FINALLY woke up to the Obamas' corruption tactics!

Now it is time that further action takes place in this NLRB issue -

1) FIRE those who illegally held those jobs

2) DEMAND that their pay be reimbursed to the People who were ROBBED by Obama!

3) REVOKE all NLRB decisions in which these illegals took place

4) ARREST and PROSECUTE OBAMA for violating Constitutional Laws involving ABUSE OF POWER!

It has been 5-6+ years of Obamas' violating our Constitutional, legislative and other Procedural Laws through his arrogant and ABUSIVE USE OF Executive privilege and Orders.

Enough is enough - ARREST this TRAITOR!

We need to know the corruption that is real and in our face! I just was at a local store and I was told by the lady at the counter, I should have my azz kicked! She is not a close neighbor but is not far away. I told her my wife is overseas. This was at the counter checking out. She told me she is too far away to do that! Ha.. love our ladies and neighbors! ,,, she is denying what many honorable Americans have gone through when following are immigration laws? Illegals are honorable Americans, legals are sent home and have been for many years! Let us note what Demonocrats want now! Import of those who so not know how we kept our freedoms! They want the foolish!

Keep our freedoms or let the Marxist Muslim supporter and his cronies take them!

Okay....maybe I missed it....so what happens now?

Obama and his larvae could care less what the SCOTUS rules. Nothing will change no matter how much they whine.

Our Marxist run Senate purposely allowed this to happen! They left it open for Barry to act! We need a big increase of Conservatives in the Senate or there will be more treasonous acts by this evil anti-American President! He has done enough already that would take many years to undo!

Exactly, Virgil.  Keep your eyes on the target.  Never waver.  Two targets.  First one and then the other.  2014: 2016. 

BTW, Does anyone have some Band-Aids. BO needs them for hi knuckles.  Silverware table knife handles can be ugly on knuckles.

 Bet every one knows, NOTHING WILL BE DONE. Obama could kill small children ,by biting there heads off ,on TV, with the congress, and supreme court watching. NOTHING WOULD BE DONE.

Never.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Al Goodwyn

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service