Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking

The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from 16 – 18 years of age. . . . Consent of the victim and belief that the victim is of the age of consent are usually considered immaterial.

pedophile is an adult with “sexual fondness for and activity” with children, i.e., minors below the age of consent. Pedophilia is legally defined as sexual child abuse, i.e., any sexual activity with a minor below the age of consent, which includes fondling a child’s genitals, intercourse, incest, rape, sodomy, exhibitionism, and commercial exploitation of children through prostitution or the production of pornographic materials.

Since the age of consent in the United States which varies from state to state is from 16 to 18, lowering the age of consent to 12 would legalize pedophilia of children age 12 and above.

That is exactly what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee and daughter of Russian Jewish immigrants, recommends in a co-authored book that led to sweeping changes made by the federal government in the name of sex equality.

ruth-bader-ginsburg

In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.

The source of the information and quotes from Sex Bias in the U.S. Code you’ll read below is Executive Director of Eagle Forum Susan Hirschmann’s Testimony Re. Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 23, 1993.

The 230-page Sex Bias in the U.S. Code identifies hundreds of federal laws alleged to discriminate against women and recommends an avalanche of government and social changes, including:

  • Military draft and combat duty for women.
  • Legalization of prostitution.
  • Sex integration of prisons, reformatories, schools and colleges and their activities (including sports), all-girls and all-boys organizations, and fraternities and sororities.
  • Changing the names of the Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts and Big Brothers of America to reflect sex integration.
  • Elimination of the traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker.
  • Comprehensive government child-care.
  • Adoption of sex-neutral language, e.g., “artificial” instead of “manmade”; “person, human” instead of “man, woman”; and plural nouns “they” and “them” instead of “singular third person pronouns”. At the same time, however, Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau hypocritically insist that the U.S. Department of Labor retains its “Women’s Bureau”.

Ginsburg wrote on p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code:

Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense . . . . A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed.The Mann Act is federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’

In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.

Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/02/09/supreme-court-justice-ginsb...

This old bat clearly needs to be removed from the bench!  Her mind has gone round the bend of no return...

Image result for lost mind

Views: 4905

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ginsburg is an evil, senile bitch. I'll like her when she's wearing a toe tag and is replaced by a hardcore conservative.

Image result for thumbs up presentermedia animation

The dried-up old sack of prunes is, obviously, mentally damaged and incompetent; she needs to be restrained in a "secure environment", before she hurts herself and creates more damage to this nation.

"In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010."

"This old bat clearly needs to be removed from the bench!  Her mind has gone round the bend of no return..."

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg mind was gone a long time ago

        I AGREE OFF THE BENCH !!!!

How come parents all over this country aren't angry, enraged, and protesting that this kind of crap is on tv and promoting sexual crimes against children?????


Fox Comedy ‘The Mick’ Features Underage Boys In Tub Prepping For Th...



www.dcclothesline.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/the-mick-boys-in-tub-sickness.jpg?resize=513%2C294" alt="" width="513" height="294"/>

In the latest episode of Fox’s “The Mick” which aired Tuesday, two underage boys are seen sitting naked in a bathtub together while waiting for another underage girl to have a threesome.

From NewsBusters:

What a pleasant scene to end another Valentine’s Day with: minors possibly having a threesome. Forget the flowers. Forget the chocolates. Forget all that sentimental notion of finding that special person who can love and cherish you. No, the Fox comedy The Mick’s implication of two underage boys in a bathtub waiting for an older girl is something that will stick with me, whether I like it or not.

In Tuesday’s episode “The Mess,” Mickey (Kaitlin Olson) tries to put her foot down with the kids, but it only leads to them going to what the eldest Sabrina refers to as a “white trash high school party.” If you can get past colorful description, we move to the actual party which…admittedly is not much better than the description itself.

That distastefulness then takes a further dive when 13-year-old Chip (Thomas Barbusca) and his friend Andrew are asked to go somewhere more private with an older girl. The boys turn to each other to establish ground rules to “make sure things don’t get weird.” “Like, you and I shouldn’t kiss for more than five seconds,” Andrew suggests. Yikes! Chip nixes the idea and Andrew says, “All right, fine, geez, we won’t kiss. Didn’t know you were gonna be so weird about it.”

The scenario ends with the young boys naked in a bathtub together as they wait for the girl to get them all drinks. Don’t believe me? See for yourself.

This is the same show which featured another young boy wearing a ball gag and putting on ...

www.informationliberation.com/files/fox-propaganda-gag-child.jpg?w=584" border="1" width="584" height="327"/>

As I reported last month, the show was created by Dave Chernin and John Chernin, both sons of top Hollywood executive Peter Chernin. It airs at prime time on regular Fox, meaning they’re literally targeting children with this garbage.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/02/17/fox-comedy-the-mick-feature...

Disgusting, period.

She is mentally evil and sick

HOW CAN A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BELIEVE SOMETHING LIKE THIS?????????

ANYONE WHO AGREES WITH SOMETHING LIKE THIS IS TOTALLY PERVERTED, AND NEEDS TO BE RELIEVED FROM THEIR POSITION!

 By allowing people like GINSBERG to be appointed for  LIFE to the SUPREME COURT by other PERVERTS like CLINTON (Bill) , the MORALITY FACTOR of the COURT descends exponentially until the NEXT APPOINTMENT is due and TWO MORE PERVERTS could drive it down even more.

In time, the entire US SUPREME COURT could make the current 9th Federal Circuit Court appear to be CONSERVATIVES in comparison.

One can only hope that Gins(ocked)burg will attend one of - -


Tweet: Find a #ResistTrump action near you!

 

This President’s Day weekend, millions of Americans will be taking to the streets all over the country to protest Trump and members of Congress are heading back home to hold a town hall event near you.

You now have the opportunity to demand answers to a central threat facing our democracy: Russia’s interference into our elections and the Trump administration's connections to Vladimir Putin!

This may be bigger than Watergate. We need to know what Trump knew and when he knew it. Only an independent commission can fully answer those questions.

Here’s what you can do:
  1. Find a Resistance action or protest near you and hold up a sign calling for an independent investigation of Russia’s interference in our democracy.
  1. Find a town hall near you and demand that your member of Congress support an independent commission to investigate reports of constant communications between Trump aides and Russian spies. Ask your member to find out:
    • Did Trump have any contact with the Russians during the election?
    • What was the nature of Gen. Michael Flynn’s relationship with the Russian government?
    • What is the United States government doing to protect future elections from Russian interference?
Twitter Find a #ResistTrump action near you!
Thank you!

GET RID OF THE OLD, SENILE, WINDBAG OF A BITCH!  SHE HAS CAUSED ENOUGH TROUBLE TO OUR COUNTRY!  DUMP HER!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service