Supreme Court ‘Bitterly Divided’ Over Obamacare

The Supreme Court appeared sharply divided Wednesday as it began hearing arguments on the fate of Obamacare.

Justices seemed “bitterly divided” during “heated” arguments over the law, reported The New York Times. If they rule that the federal subsidies the Internal Revenue Service has doled out for Obamacare plans are illegal, millions of people would no longer be able to afford their plans, and the entire law would be crippled.

The four liberal justices indicated strong support for the Obama administration’s position, in opposition to the most conservative members of the court. Those four will likely have to win over either Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., who didn’t say much, or Justice Anthony Kennedy, who said he’s not comfortable with the administration’s position.

The law states that only people who buy Obamacare “though an Exchange established by the state,” are eligible for subsidies, but the IRS has subsidized plans for millions of people who purchased them through the federal exchange.

read more:

http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/04/supreme-court-bitterly-divided-ov...

Views: 462

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Roberts betrayed the American people with Obamacare. I don't see him looking for redemption at all...Semper Fi Nam 66-67

The law states that only people who buy Obamacare “though an Exchange established by the state,” are eligible for subsidies, but the IRS has subsidized plans for millions of people who purchased them through the federal exchange.  I SEE NO PROBLEM THE LAW IS CLEAR IF THEY READ IT.

KAGAN; SOTOMEYER WILL LOOK AND MAKE UP THEIR VERSION AS USUAL 

IT IS CLEAR AND NEEDS TO BE THAT WAY THE LAW IS A SHAM AND A CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION FROM DAY ONE 

Kagan and Sotomeyer need to be impeached for judicial activism and gross judicial misconduct.  The only requirement for removing a Supreme Court Justice from office is BAD BEHAVIOR as Congress determines..  As Judges may be removed for Bad Behavior, the process being defined by the Constitution, Congress may Impeach Justice and convict them upon trial in the Senate with 2/3rds of those PRESENT voting to convict.

In fact, it can take as few as 2/3rda of a Quorum to convict or as few a 33 votes to convict ... even the President on charges of Impeachment.  It is not 2/3rds of the total in the Senate. Hence, with a little imaginative planning as few as 33 votes is all it takes to convict on trial for impeachment.

Abolish it .

If only Roberts would do the right thing. Obummer care is the worse thing for America.

Chief Justice Robert's is COMPROMISED... he has literally been black mailed for what may well be illegally adopting his two daughters.  Serious allegations to that effect were made prior to his mysterious reversal on the Constitutionality of Obama Care. 

Don't look for Chief Justice Roberts to champion the Constitution any longer... he should resign, if he has been compromised. And Congress should tell Obama that any new federal judges he sends for confirmation are DOA... don't confirm any more of his appointments... none of them... including and especially judges.

The Supreme court ,Needs to have Term limites No more appointments for life and they need to be elicted by the people Not appointed. !!

Absolutely... and when a Term Limits and Recall Amendment is passed it should include all federal appointees including judges.. one 6yr term with 1/3rd standing for appointment every 2yrs. It is time to term limit every federal officer and official... every member of Congress, the Administration and Federal Courts... appointed and elected.  No more professional politicians or their cronies.

Myself, I have no interest at all in letting the people of NYC, LA and Chicago choose our SCOTUS justices through an election.

The Law is clear... only those who qualify and purchased their insurance thru a State Exchange should have received subsidies... Misappropriation of government funds is a felony... those individuals who authorized payments to unqualified individuals should be JAILED...

It is time that the Congress demand our DOJ act to prosecute those members of the government who misdirect government funding ... misappropriated funds.  Authorizing expenditures without lawful authority is the same thing as 'theft' and it is a federal crime.  Where are the demands for jail time..

Once the Civil service sees their buddies going to jail for obeying or following what they know to be illegal executive orders or directives... they will refuse to brake the law.. and Obama's regime will be powerless to enforce their unlawful acts.

Congress needs to pass a Congressional Resolution reminding the Civil Service that they must obey the Statutory Law.. that Executive Orders and Directives that are in violation of the law must not be acted upon.  They need to inform the Civil Service that they will be prosecuted should they choose to disobey the Statutory Law or act to disburse funds for illegal purposes... they need to know that judgment will not be postponed forever.  Once the Civil Service knows that they will be held accountable to the Law and not to Obama's illegal Executive Orders and Directives... they will begin to refuse to implement Obama's illegal programs.

Sir:

I implore you, run for office!

I suppose I must prepare myself for an extended internment. I do not and will not support the socialist ACA. I will not register or participate in any manner. I will pay in cash or if the PTB eliminate paper money, I'll give the doctor a damn chicken but I will not be a mindless follower to the ruination of my Country and all it  represents as enumerated in the Constitution of the United States of America.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

Judicial Watch->  Emails Show Dossier-Connected Obama State Dept Officials Set ‘Face-To-Face’ Meeting On ‘Russian Matter’ Shortly Before 2016 Election

Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation on Thursday released 84 pages of documents showing Obama’s State Department was central to pushing the ‘Trump-Russia’ hoax shortly before the 2016 election.

The email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a very close associate to Christopher Steele, show them discussing a ‘face-to-face’ meeting in New York on a ‘Russian matter’ in September of 2016.

Via Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch and The Daily Caller News Foundation today released 84 pages of documents, including a September 2016 email exchange between then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer, a close associate of dossier author Christopher Steele, discussing a “face-to-face” meeting on a “Russian matter.”

(In June 2016 Nuland permitted a meeting between Steele and the FBI’s legal attaché in Rome. Nuland told CBS News that the State Department knew about the Steele dossier by July 2016.)

According to an op-ed Winer wrote for The Washington Post in 2018, also in September 2016, “Steele and I met in Washington and discussed the information now known as the “dossier… I prepared a two-page summary and shared it with Nuland, who indicated that, like me, she felt that the secretary of state needed to be made aware of this material.”

A September 17, 2016, email exchange between Nuland and Winer – that was classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy – discusses the political situation in Libya, but also brings up a “Russian matter:”

From: Winer, Jonathan
Sent: September 17, 2016 at 12:40:00 PM EDT
To: Nuland, Victoria J
Subject: Re: Libya Update

Would like to discuss this and a Russian matter.

From: Nuland, Victoria J
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:31 PM
To: Winer, Jonathan
Subject: Re. Libya Update

In ny face to face?

From: Winer, Jonathan
Sent: September 17, 2016 at 1:56:05 PM EDT
To: Nuland, Victoria J
Subject: Re: Libya Update

Yes that was [sic] be good.

From: Nuland, Victoria J
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:58 PM
To: Winer, Jonathan
Subject: Re. Libya Update

Good. I’ll reach out when im there Sunday. [Redacted]

If Victoria Nuland’s name sounds familiar it’s because she has been on Judicial Watch’s radar for a long time and in many of TGP’s previous reports.

In December 2018, Judicial Watch released documents revealing that Victoria Nuland was involved in the Obama State Department’s urgent gathering of classified Russia investigation information and disseminating it to members of Congress within hours of Donald Trump taking office.

In a related lawsuit, Judicial Watch is suing the State Department communications between Ambassador Nuland and employees of Fusion GPS, as well as top ranking Department of Justice, FBI, and State Department officials.

“The Obama State Department was central to the effort to target President Trump with the Russia smear,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These new emails further show that senior Obama State Department advanced the Russiagate hoax just before the 2016 presidential election.”

Tom Fitton   @TomFitton
 

BREAKING: Obama State Department was central to the effort to target President @RealDonaldTrump with the Russia smear. New emails show how senior Obama State Department advanced the Russiagate hoax just before the 2016 presidential election.

Embedded video

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service