SPLC- Funding Huge Lawsuits Against Judaeo Jewish Faith & Christian Groups

 Over the last few years, the SPLC has used its enormous bankroll to fund lawsuits against Christian and Jewish groups and Tea Party Individuals that are effective or whom the SPLC wants to make a strategic “example” of. For example, last year, the SPLC used the courts to shut down the counseling service JONAH, a Jewish group helping people who wanted to leave the homosexual lifestyle. SPLC has recently announced a lawsuit against Mat Staver and Liberty Counsel, a Christian-based legal service.

 Of course, the SPLC also sues purported neo-Nazi and similar groups (usually relatively small and impotent), and then uses those “wins” for huge fundraising.

 The Southern Poverty Law Center also funded the purge against big mouth Alex Jones, the next target is Tea Party sites that do not support open borders, or are Trump Supporters.


 This Southern Poverty Law Center is a Jewish Foundation, but not under Christ, they are of the Old Order of the Talmud.

Many Jews do not accept gays, most feel that Christ has shown a path, and this should be respected. In Israel, many argue that gays and transgenders should not be allowed to pray at their Holy Wall, Jerusalem's Wailing Wall as it is known in Hebrew (כתל המערבי/KOE-tehl ha-mah-ah-ra-VEE), or Temples.

 There is a religious war taking place, and it is far from being over.


Views: 105

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Southern Poverty law center is full of Extreme Left-wing Liberal's and Anti-Christian and Jewish People / they hate our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel-Yisrael!!

The Southern Poverty law center is muslim brotherhood members and Sympathizers just like the ACLU ANTI-CHRISTIAN LEFT-WING UN-American!!

United We Stand with Israel-Yisrael and our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America, Divided We FALL!!

Love Always and Shalom ( Peace ), YSIC \o/

Kristi Ann

 Dear Kristi Ann, I wish I was there when those who teach you the word, Judeo, there is no such word in our Jewish Faith. The word is Judaeo, understanding the true Jewish world and that of a political agenda is not faith.

 You say, they hate our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel, they are Israelis, and they are the political left. They do not have rights to say Our Christian Nation, Jewish Laws is not Christian.

 The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 28 member states, they, most of them, do not even follow the Hebrew Bible, or Christianity.

 They are of  The Children of Ahasuerus, they are the children of the Wandering Jew the curse of Cain.

 These are Gods actions against Jews who hate Christ, and betrayed God's Son.

There is No Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America,  if you are a follower of the Old Order. If you are, you should put away the Talmud, and never let it be seen again, by God.

Oppps, Tom got spammed....:)


They also have gone after Dr. D. James Kennedy Ministries. (SPLC)

 Seems like these Jewish Lawyers have it going on....:)-

I did find that news story Jean, I am trying to post it, but this site is messing up again and I can not post it yet. The SPLC is also connect to Apple and Amazon.

I don't know Tom, I kind of like it when Kristi Ann spams my blogs, it puts a smile on my face because its the same old stuff, Pete and repeat sat on a fence Pete fell off and who was left?




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service