Billionaire leftist teams up with Democrat attorneys general to bury administration in legal challenges

More than a dozen lawsuits and counting have been filed against President Donald Trump’s executive order that temporarily blocks visas from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, and Yemen. Looking beyond the handful of emotional personal stories that are gaining the media’s sympathy, there is a more predictable political power dynamic at play. The lawsuits largely stem from organizations bankrolled by billionaire leftist George Soros and Democratic state attorneys general.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who has carried out a political vendetta against Trump, led 15 other state attorneys general in a joint statement condemning what they called an “unconstitutional, un-American and unlawful executive order.” The Democratic AGs also said, “Religious liberty has been, and always will be, a bedrock principle of our country and no president can change that truth,” a curious statement from the party that targeted the Little Sisters of the Poor.

“It shouldn’t surprise anyone that pressure groups funded by George Soros are litigating to keep U.S. ports-of-entry wide open to terrorists and other people who hate America … Soros has said he wants to bring America down.”

Last August, George Soros’ son, Alex Soros, posted a picture of himself with Schneiderman on Instagram, and wrote, “Great to meet with #newyork attorney general @ericschneiderman who recognized that @realdonaldtrump was a fraud way before many and has courageously taken him on!”

Schneiderman, as well as Democratic attorneys general in Virginia and Massachusetts, intervened in existing lawsuits. The lawsuit brought by Washington State Attorney General Robert Ferguson has achieved the most success, bringing the case that blocked the order nationwide.

The lawsuit convinced a federal judge of the state’s standing on the claim the order is “separating Washington families, harming thousands of Washington residents, damaging Washington’s economy, hurting Washington-based companies and undermining Washington’s sovereign interest in remaining a welcoming place for immigrants and refugees.”

Judge Blocks Immigration Order Nationwide
Inform
autoplay: on | off

Democrats are even raising money off the lawsuits. In a Facebook post, the Democratic Attorneys General Association said, "Stand with Attorney General Bob Ferguson and all Democratic State Attorneys General fighting for what's right!" It added, "Chip in to support Democratic AGs fighting for progressive rights and freedoms."

Outside of the politicians, Soros' Open Society Foundations, which advocates for open borders, is financing several advocacy groups that initiated litigation against the order.

Leading the way in these lawsuits in several states is the American Civil Liberties Union, which has gotten at least $35.5 million from the Open Society Foundations, according to the Capital Research Center, a Washington think tank that investigates nonprofits.

Soros also gave $4.6 million to the National Immigration Law Center, which has been involved in litigation, according to the CRC; and $621,000 to the Urban Justice Center, which has an appendage known as the International Refugee Assistance Project that has jumped into the lawsuits, according to the CRC.

Judge Who Blocked Trump Action Has Activist PastRobart made a point of saying 'Black Lives Matter' in dispute with ...

"It shouldn't surprise anyone that pressure groups funded by George Soros are litigating to keep U.S. ports-of-entry wide open to terrorists and other people who hate America," Matthew Vadum, senior vice president of the CRC, told LifeZette. "Soros has said he wants to bring America down. Flooding the country with Muslim aliens who won't assimilate is one way to do that."

In a Seattle suit, separate from the Washington State case, ABC News reported the American Immigration Council, the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild filed a class action complaint on behalf of lawful permanent residents that want their immediate family members that are citizens of the seven countries be able to enter the United States.

Soros' Open Society Foundations gave $425,000 to the American Immigration Council from 2011 through 2013, according to the CRC, which shows Soros' group also gave at least $50,000 to the National Lawyers Guild.

The fact that a lawsuit is politically motivated doesn't mean it lacks legal merits. Republican attorneys general and conservative groups challenged the Obama administration's executive actions. But as the media plays up emotional stories, no one should try to divorce politics from these legal maneuvers.

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/soros-fingerprints-all-over-anti...

Related image

Views: 387

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Democrates can now boast how they waste taxpayers money not on building streets and repairing our bridges but in legal battles. They better start wising up and trying to get along with Trump because he has veto power they won't getting anything passes.

Soros is an international Terrorist disguising himself as a philanthropist through his Open Society.org.  In fact he is an Anarchist who should be shut down, He uses his vast wealthe which he stole from his Jewish brethren as he helped the Nazis send them to concentration camps and  gas chambers.  What he is doing in America violates the Alien and Sedition act.  He is evil.  He is the main cause of muslims flooding the EU.ans the US  When Jeff Sessions gets approved as AG. he could do what Russia and Hungary have done and outlaw Soros actions against this country.  His financial Terrorism must be stopped. He is the most disruptive person on the planet

I don't understand why he's still living, having been part of the Nazi SS.  I'm surprised Israel didn't "take him out" decades ago...  WHY was this man ever even allowed to have citizenship in the U.S. to begin with?  Who did he pay off back then?

Hate to burst bubble, but Soros could Not have helped Nazis as he was only 12 years old that is 2017 - 1940.  Well I guess he could at that age, but ??

George Soros – Excerpt of “60 Minutes” Interview – December 20, 1998 with Steve Kroft.  (This Video is not found on the CNN website but has resurfaced on the internet – Watch It Below)

Kroft: You are a Hungarian Jew who escaped the Holocaust by posing as a Christian?

Soros: Right.

Kroft: And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps?

Soros: Right, I was 14 years old…

Kroft: …My understanding is you went out with this protector of yours, who swore you were his adopted godson.

Soros: Yes.

Kroft: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from Jews.

Soros: Yes, that’s right.

Kroft: That sounds like an experience that would send lots of folks to the psychiatric couch for many many years. Was it difficult?

Soros: Not at all, not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t see the connection, but it created no problem at all.

Kroft: No feeling of guilt, for example, that I’m Jewish and here I am watching these people go, I could just as easily be one of them that I could be there for example that I should be there, none of that?

Soros: Well, of course, I could be on the other side, or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense I shouldn’t be there…if I weren’t there, of course I wasn’t doing it, but someone else would be taking it away anyhow, whether I was there or not I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. I had no role in taking away property. So I had no guilt.

https://subjectpolitics.com/george-soros-tries-compare-trump-hitler...

Of course he had no guilt.......you need a conscience for that.

good let them burn through the global commies money instead of the taxpayer's

Rush Limbaugh made a good point on 6 Feb 2017 that the way federal judges are appointed is tit-for-tat, and that Crazy Patty Murray was the one who wanted Robart appointed as a judge in exchange for renaming a post office or something just as dumb. Just goes to show that we need to vet judges as much or more than potential terrorists. 

I’m not sure what the closing paragraph of this article means.  If a lawsuit has legal merits, why would political motivation be part of bringing suit?  Justice does not require political motivation and is not helped by it.

 If a suit is predominately and fundamentally politically motivated it discolors any actual legal merit the suit has.  This is so because when political motivation is a part of a law suit, it is action taken for the sake of political ideology, not justice. The political activist is motivated by his convictions, which may or may not include the value of justice. But in any legal proceedings, politics should be kept out of argument referencing only the Constitution.   

Consequently, the paragraph is gratuitous. It has no reason for being included in the article except as an effort to appear “fair minded.”  But if the article is fair it doesn’t need the appearance of fairness.   So, I wonder: how accurate is the entire story?  Is there any truth to it at all or was it fabricated to attack Soros?  If the latter, one should recognize that one cannot fight viciousness by being vicious.

The only thing that strikes me as truly important is the statement by Mr. Vadum, senior vice president of the Capital Research Center, who stated, “It shouldn't surprise anyone that pressure groups funded by George Soros are litigating to keep U.S. ports-of-entry wide open to terrorists and other people who hate America.  Soros has said he wants to bring America down.  Flooding the country with Muslim aliens who won't assimilate is one way to do that."

It is the refusal to assimilate that is basic to regarding Muslim refugees with some concern.  If they do not want to reject Sharia law, if they will not recognize freedom for women as well as men, if Muslim women are forbidden education, if genital mutilation continues as an acceptable practice, -- all the rest of that barbaric law – then I do not see why they would want to come  here in the first place.  Which leads me to consider the Temporary Restraining Order valid and law suits against it rather suspect.

 

’m not sure what the closing paragraph of this article means.  If a lawsuit has legal merits, why would political motivation be part of bringing suit?  Justice does not require political motivation and is not helped by it.

 If a suit is predominately and fundamentally politically motivated it discolors any actual legal merit the suit has.  This is so because when political motivation is a part of a law suit, it is action taken for the sake of political ideology, not justice. The political activist is motivated by his convictions, which may or may not include the value of justice. But in any legal proceedings, politics should be kept out of argument referencing only the Constitution.   

Consequently, the paragraph is gratuitous. It has no reason for being included in the article except as an effort to appear “fair minded.”  But if the article is fair it doesn’t need the appearance of fairness.   So, I wonder: how accurate is the entire story?  Is there any truth to it at all or was it fabricated to attack Soros?  If the latter, one should recognize that one cannot fight viciousness by being vicious.

The only thing that strikes me as truly important is the statement by Mr. Vadum, senior vice president of the Capital Research Center, who stated, “It shouldn't surprise anyone that pressure groups funded by George Soros are litigating to keep U.S. ports-of-entry wide open to terrorists and other people who hate America.  Soros has said he wants to bring America down.  Flooding the country with Muslim aliens who won't assimilate is one way to do that."

It is the refusal to assimilate that is basic to regarding Muslim refugees with some concern.  If they do not want to reject Sharia law, if they will not recognize freedom for women as well as men, if Muslim women are forbidden education, if genital mutilation continues as an acceptable practice, -- all the rest of that barbaric law – then I do not see why they would want to come  here in the first place.  Which leads me to consider the Temporary Restraining Order valid and law suits against it rather suspect.

I’m not sure what the closing paragraph of this article means.  If a lawsuit has legal merits, why would political motivation be part of bringing suit?  Justice does not require political motivation and is not helped by it.

 If a suit is predominately and fundamentally politically motivated it discolors any actual legal merit the suit has.  This is so because when political motivation is a part of a law suit, it is action taken for the sake of political ideology, not justice. The political activist is motivated by his convictions, which may or may not include the value of justice. But in any legal proceedings, politics should be kept out of argument referencing only the Constitution.   

Consequently, the paragraph is gratuitous. It has no reason for being included in the article except as an effort to appear “fair minded.”  But if the article is fair it doesn’t need the appearance of fairness.   So, I wonder: how accurate is the entire story?  Is there any truth to it at all or was it fabricated to attack Soros?  If the latter, one should recognize that one cannot fight viciousness by being vicious.

The only thing that strikes me as truly important is the statement by Mr. Vadum, senior vice president of the Capital Research Center, who stated, “It shouldn't surprise anyone that pressure groups funded by George Soros are litigating to keep U.S. ports-of-entry wide open to terrorists and other people who hate America.  Soros has said he wants to bring America down.  Flooding the country with Muslim aliens who won't assimilate is one way to do that."

It is the refusal to assimilate that is basic to regarding Muslim refugees with some concern.  If they do not want to reject Sharia law, if they will not recognize freedom for women as well as men, if Muslim women are forbidden education, if genital mutilation continues as an acceptable practice, -- all the rest of that barbaric law – then I do not see why they would want to come  here in the first place.  Which leads me to consider the Temporary Restraining Order valid and law suits against it rather suspect.

I’m not sure what the closing paragraph of this article means.  If a lawsuit has legal merits, why would political motivation be part of bringing suit?  Justice does not require political motivation and is not helped by it.

 If a suit is predominately and fundamentally politically motivated it discolors any actual legal merit the suit has.  This is so because when political motivation is a part of a law suit, it is action taken for the sake of political ideology, not justice. The political activist is motivated by his convictions, which may or may not include the value of justice. But in any legal proceedings, politics should be kept out of argument referencing only the Constitution.   

Consequently, the paragraph is gratuitous. It has no reason for being included in the article except as an effort to appear “fair minded.”  But if the article is fair it doesn’t need the appearance of fairness.   So, I wonder: how accurate is the entire story?  Is there any truth to it at all or was it fabricated to attack Soros?  If the latter, one should recognize that one cannot fight viciousness by being vicious.

The only thing that strikes me as truly important is the statement by Mr. Vadum, senior vice president of the Capital Research Center, who stated, “It shouldn't surprise anyone that pressure groups funded by George Soros are litigating to keep U.S. ports-of-entry wide open to terrorists and other people who hate America.  Soros has said he wants to bring America down.  Flooding the country with Muslim aliens who won't assimilate is one way to do that."

It is the refusal to assimilate that is basic to regarding Muslim refugees with some concern.  If they do not want to reject Sharia law, if they will not recognize freedom for women as well as men, if Muslim women are forbidden education, if genital mutilation continues as an acceptable practice, -- all the rest of that barbaric law – then I do not see why they would want to come  here in the first place.  Which leads me to consider the Temporary Restraining Order valid and law suits against it rather suspect.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

BREAKING:   Hillary Clinton Donor Ed Buck Arrested After Another Male Overdoses In His Seedy LA Apartment

Democrat donor and Hillary friend Ed Buck was finally arrested Tuesday night after a third man overdosed in his apartment.

The man who overdosed in Ed Buck’s Los Angeles apartment last week survived, however the other two victims previously died.

Ed Buck will be in court Wednesday.

Ed Buck loves to inject young black gay escorts with methamphetamine — the mother of one of Ed Buck’s victims described it as a fetish.

He was finally arrested after two black gay escorts died in his apartment from overdoses.

KTLA 5 reported:

The prominent Democratic donor and LGBTQ political activist Ed Buck was arrested Tuesday and charged with operating a drug house and providing methamphetamine to a 37-year-old man who overdosed last week, officials said.

Buck was charged with three counts of battery causing serious injury, administering methamphetamine and maintaining a drug house, according to the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. Buck is accused of injecting the victim, who survived, with methamphetamine on Sept. 11.

CBSLA Assignment Desk @KCBSKCALDesk
 

: Democratic donor Ed Buck has been arrested and charged by @LADAOffice. Buck is accused of running a drug den out of his home. @JeffMichaelNews has details on .

Video of Ed Buck getting taken away by Sheriff deputies:

Bill Melugin    @BillFOXLA

BREAKING: Democratic donor Ed Buck has been arrested at his West Hollywood apartment on drug charges, per @WHDLASD. Neighbor on scene tells me Buck is currently in the back of one of the cruisers. Two gay black men previously died of meth overdoses at his apt. @FOXLA

Bill Melugin    @BillFOXLA
 

BREAKING: Here is video of being taken away by deputies following his arrest at his apartment on drug charges tonight. @FOXLA

of another young black gay escort was found at the West Hollywood home of Ed Buck, a top Democrat donor and political activist.

As previously reported, a black gay escort named Gemmel Moore died of a meth overdose at Ed Buck’s West Hollywood home in July of 2017.

The LA County District Attorney’s Office previously declined to prosecute Ed Buck saying the evidence was “insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that (Buck) is responsible for the death of Gemmel Moore,” which sparked an outrage from family members and others in the community.

Jasmyne Cannick told FOX and Friends nearly a dozen black men have come forward to speak on their experiences with “serial predator” Ed Buck.
Cannick also went off on the Democrat Party: “Over 77% of black people in California vote Democratic. We vote for Democrats.

It is a shame that when something like this happens, when you have the chair of your state party when at the time of this , Eric Bauman, who was willing to turn a blind eye as well as instruct others not to speak on it. As a black woman, as a black Democrat, I expect more from my party.

Last week, a black male was seen entering Ed Buck’s seedy LA apartment.

Update: Top Democrat Donor Ed Buck Charged with Maintaining Drug House – Police Find HUNDREDS OF PHOTOS of Men in Compromising Positions in His Home

Buck was charged with operating a drug house.

According to the LA Times — Sheriff’s investigators found hundreds of photographs in Buck’s home of men in compromising positions.

Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 @JackPosobiec
 

Sheriff’s investigators found hundreds of photographs in Ed Buck’s home of men in compromising positions

Democratic donor Ed Buck arrested, charged with operating drug house

Buck was charged with three counts of battery causing serious injury, administering methamphetamine and maintaining a drug house, according to the Los Angeles County district attorney's office. Buck...   latimes.com

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service