Sex Studies Prof Says Virgin Mary Didn’t Consent; ‘Predatory’ God Raped Her

 Sex Studies, right, someone has their head up their as*sss, and what can you say that is better then my statement against this.

 God is “predator” who exhibited the classic traits of “toxic masculinity” when he “forced” the Virgin Mary to conceive the Christ child without seeking her consent, according to an associate professor of Clinical Psychology and Sexuality Studies at Minnesota State University.

Associate Professor Eric Sprankle tweeted that he wasn’t quite sure if the Virgin Mary had given “consent” when an angel came down from the heavens and told her that she would give birth to Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

LOL OK Right............

On Monday, Sprankle wrote, “The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen. There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario. Happy Holidays.”

Eric Sprankle, PsyD
@DrSprankle

The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen. There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario. Happy Holidays.


God is "predator" who exhibited the classic traits of "toxic masculinity" when he "forced" the Virgin Mary to conceive the Christ child without seeking her consent, according to an associate professor of Clinical Psychology and Sexuality Studies at Minnesota State University.

The Blaze reports:

When a Twitter user who seemed to have at least a working knowledge of the Bible called Sprankle out and said that the Virgin Mary did, indeed, OK the plan, Sprankle responded by calling God’s plan “an unethical abuse of power at best and grossly predatory at worst.”

The user wrote, “Sorry. LK 1 26:38 states clearly that the angel communicated God’s plan for Mary and in verse 38 she agreed. Whether you believe or disbelieve, it helps if you actually read the text.”

Sprankle responded, “The biblical god regularly punished disobedience. The power difference (deity vs mortal) and the potential for violence for saying ‘no’ negates her ‘yes.’ To put someone in this position is an unethical abuse of power at best and grossly predatory at worst.”

What else?

The user’s remark must have stuck in Sprankle’s craw, because he later retweeted the user’s sentiments and mockingly added another set of sentiments.

“‘I’d never force you to be in a relationship with me, but I will destroy you and everyone you love if you aren’t,'” Sprankle maliciously paraphrased.

Campus Reform reports:

Sprankle is public with his anti-religious views and endorses “secularism” in his Twitter biography.

Earlier in December, he tweeted a photo of a toy Christmas elf with his arm around a statue of what appears to be Baphomet, an occult depiction of an entity regularly associated with Satanism, according to The Church of Satan’s website.

Sprankle also decorated his Christmas tree with Satanic decor, as shown in another tweet he sent this past weekend.

Campus Reform emailed Dr. Sprankle and called his office at the university but did not receive a response in time for publicaiton. Minnesota State University, Mankato did not respond in time for publication.

https://newspunch.com/sex-virgin-mary-consent-god/

Eric Sprankle, PsyD Reminds Me Of GOP

Views: 25

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

                              Eric Sprankle, PsyD Reminds Me Of GOP

                                           Tweet That   ......LMBO....:)

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Ken Catalino

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

‘Breaking: Supreme Court Sides With Trump Over Sanctuary Cities In Deportation Case

 The US Supreme Court sided with President Trump over sanctuary cities today in a 5-4 decision.

The court ruled the government has the power to detain people who are facing deportation because of the crimes they committed.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh in the majority.

Bloomberg.com reported:

A divided U.S. Supreme Court bolstered the government’s power to detain people who are facing deportation because of crimes they committed, siding with the Trump administration in a clash with implications for so-called sanctuary cities.

The case focused on non-citizen legal residents who serve a criminal sentence, get released and later are arrested by federal immigration agents.

The 5-4 ruling Tuesday said those people aren’t entitled to a bond hearing, and the possibility of re-release, while the Homeland Security Department presses its case for deportation. The ruling reversed a decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In announcing the decision from the bench, Justice Samuel Alito said the lower court had made a “policy judgment” using reasoning that “makes a mockery” of the federal immigration laws…

…Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority, but they splintered in their reasoning.

Thomas and Gorsuch didn’t agree with all of Alito’s opinion. They said courts lack power to consider issues involving the detention of non-citizens until those people are facing a deportation order.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service