Seth Rich Was a Wikileaks Informant: Seth Rich Murdered

Seth Rich Murdered, Holy Crap! Here Is Video of Hillary Clinton Using Seth Rich to Push Gun Control at Campaign Stop – ABSOLUTELY SICKENING! by Steve of the Tea Party Command Center.


On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”


The Metropolitan police posted a reward for information on Rich’s murder.


In August Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.

Julian Assange also suggested in August that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.

Via Mike Cernovich:


Seth Rich reportedly sent over 44,000 emails to Wikileaks — and then he was murdered!


Here is a video clip of Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail using Democratic operative Seth Rich in a gun control talk.



Views: 101

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Shot several times and once in the back.

Did anyone hear the shots?

Good morning Gregory

Detective: Top Democrat called police, family inquiring about probe into unsolved mystery

WASHINGTON – A top Democratic National Committee official has contacted Washington, D.C., police and the family of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich demanding to know why a homicide detective is examining the unsolved case, a private investigator told WND Tuesday.
Detective Rod Wheeler, who started his investigation into Seth’s death in March, told WND he was stunned Monday when he learned from Rich’s family that the DNC contacted them about the case.

“How did that DNC person know I had called the police? That is what is baffling me,” Wheeler said. “I just found out from [Rich’s] family that the DNC knew I contacted the police – they hadn’t told me that all this time.”

After Wheeler went to the police for insight into Rich’s murder, the detective assigned to the investigation never replied to Wheeler’s inquiry.

“The family said, ‘Rod, there is something that you need to know,” Wheeler explained. “The police detective never called you back because the information was given to the DNC that you called the police trying to figure out what was going on.”

Wheeler, who began working as a homicide detective in 1989, said he is perturbed by the odd reaction the police have when he approaches them with questions about Rich.

Cops in Washington, D.C., he said, suspiciously respond to his inquiries about Rich’s murder with an ominous “blank stare.”

“It’s a blank stare – it’s scary,” he said. “I’m getting nothing from police, just nothing.”

Read more:

Report: Seth Rich Sent More Than 44,000 Emails To WikiLeaks Prior To His Murder

Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee staffer shot and killed in Washington D.C. last year had leaked tens of thousands of internal DNC emails to WikiLeaks, according to a report by Fox News.

A federal investigator who reviewed a report detailing contents of Rich’s computer generated within a week of his murder said Rich made repeated contact with WikiLeaks through its former director, Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased investigative reporter who was living in London at the time.

“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,” said the investigator, who requested anonymity.

People with damning info on Bill and Hillary shot in public places, no signs of theft

The unsolved case of Democratic National Committee data analyst Seth Rich’s death shares some eerie similarities with many mysterious deaths of individuals linked to former President Bill Clinton and twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Just as in the Rich case, several of the people who died mysterious deaths were shot spontaneously and in public places, sometimes from behind, sometimes by unknown assailants and often just before they were set to release incriminating evidence concerning the Clintons’ activities. In most cases, there were no signs of theft at the crime scenes. And while some of the deaths were ruled suicides, other cases remain a mystery.

The reason the family doesn't want a full and complete investigation looks to me as if they are afraid for themselves.

The reason the police gives Wheeler blank stares may be due to the fear of consequences for speaking.

If it is a political motivated murder then you can count on people that roost very high in the democrat tree of crime and corruption having responsibility written all over their rear ends.  Very high.

I know that it sounds trite but it is nevertheless true, the DNC is run like a Mafia because it is in the same business, that being control, by any means to achieve it and maintain it, and one of the most influential men to give it both policy and procedure was none other than Saul Alinsky.

Alinsky developed his rules by his close association and involvement with the Mob in Chicago, and even became a personal confidant of Frank Nitty. Ayers, Dorne, Obama, and Clinton are disciples, the first two teaching at the University level, Obama a "Harvard Law Constitutional Scholar, former US Senator, and two term President of the United States, with Clinton's resume being First Lady, US Senator, and the Secretary of State, as well as twice running for the Presidency, so please do not think that corruption and criminality are limited to those of an ordinary street bum or the level of Lee Harvey Oswald.

It isn't hard to see why a family  would be afraid of an investigation into the murder of their son, nor is it to see why local police would be reluctant to pursue the truth behind the crime.

Fear has always been a great motivator.  The Mob uses it.

So did Alinsky.

Saul Alinsky


Hillbeast wrote about Rules for Radicals in her college days and carries a copy in her purse.

Alinsky was into Devil worship, he was a idiot, just like Hillary Clinton

Podesta took Hillbeast to satanic rituals.

This is old news... it is obvious that the DC police have done nothing regarding this high profile murder.... neither have the MSM...  I wonder why/?

The FBI would have to be invited by the DC Metro police to investigate this murder... or have other compelling Federal interests as jurisdiction  to pursue this crime... Hell, remember the murder of Vince Foster... it was investigated by the Park Police... as his body was found in a Federal Park.   This is why we must drain the swamp... murder is being routinely sanctioned by what appears to be powerful political interests. 

It is old news. Alinsky died in 1972. Clinton is 70, Obama 50 or 51 (who knows since no valid birth certificate is available) and both Ayers and Dorne were actively involved  in murder, mayhem, and terrorism beginning in the 60's.

All, however, are still engaged with Clinton and Obama having the most influence, and that is very relevant as to what we are enduring today. Namely domestic terrorism, sedition, and open treason, now to the point of the president being accused of, now get this and don't die laughing as I nearly did, Obstruction of Justice, by none other than that little weasel pretending to be a journalist on ABC. I can't think of the name of this dope, but he very fittingly "worked" in the Clinton administration as a gofer.

The FBI has been tainted beyond recognition by Comey, who makes Hoover look like a champion of integrity sponsored investigation in comparison. The Justice department was reduced to a gun running venture, the Secretary of State to a lying incompetent exercise in hooliganism, and the presidency to a phony alien openly expressing his disgust and hatred for America while supporting terrorism, and while cashing his paycheck strutting about like a rooster with a worm.

This old news has repercussions that have only just commenced, and in my opinion warrant the justice department launching a real and a full investigation resulting in the indictment and prosecution of all those who have been seemingly immune to the " long arm of the law."

I know what you meant, Col. Nelson, and it was not to let it go. It was the fact that it has been continuing for so long.

Even more bizarre following bombshell revelation on murdered DNC staffer

WASHINGTON – On the heels of a bombshell revelation that indicated it might have been a Democratic staffer rather than the Russians who hacked the party’s emails, a top investigative reporter is even more puzzled by the FBI’s curious lack of curiosity in perhaps the prime piece of evidence.

Five-time Emmy-award winning reporter Sharyl Attkisson shared her razor-sharp insights with WND on a truly bizarre aspect of the investigation: If the Democratic National Committee, or DNC, claimed its email system was hacked by Russia, why didn’t it let the FBI examine its email server?

And why didn’t the FBI examine the server regardless of whether the DNC objected?

“This has always been befuddling to me,” Attkisson mused.

“If our intel agencies truly believe Russia (or any foreign interest) tried to ‘hack’ our elections or steal emails of the DNC, then it seems to me they would have an obligation in the interest of national security to confiscate and fully examine the evidence, even if the party holding the evidence doesn’t consent,” observed the former chief investigative reporter for CBS News, now the anchor of her own Sunday morning national TV news program, “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.”

She pointedly noted, “The FBI doesn’t need the DNC’s consent to take their equipment and conduct a thorough forensic exam for the security of our nation.”

“The fact that the FBI didn’t press this issue seemed, at the very least, uninquisitive on its part,” Attkisson drolly observed with understatement.

“Based on the FBI’s lack of examining the DNC equipment and its concurrent insistence that Russia did it, and that Russia posed a dire national security threat; we’re left to conclude that the FBI allowed a political party (the DNC) to hamper its ability to secure our nation and mitigate the dire threat.”

“This doesn’t make much sense to me,” she concluded.

These lingering unanswered questions and pertinent observations took on riveting new significance with a sensational revelation Monday, one that lent new credence to the theory that it might not have been the Russians who hacked the DNC.

Instead, it might have been one of the DNC’s own employees, Seth Rich, who provided key emails embarrassing to the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

Read more:




Breaking:  FBI Admits Comey Leaked Memos 
 That Were Classified   Material! 

The FBI turned over the Comey memos to Congress today after missing their deadline earlier in the week.

Congressional leaders threatened to impeach deep state leaders if they continued to stall on the memos.

Fired FBI Chief James Comey wrote about the memos in his book and leaked the documents to reporters last year. Congress has not yet had a chance to look at the memos — Until tonight.


Meaning Fired FBI Chief James Comey leaked CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO THE PRESS.

From the report:

From the DOJ to Congress:

Therefore, pursuant to your request, we are providing the requested memoranda in both the redacted and unredacted formats for your convenience. Consistent with your request, we are providing an unclassified version of the documents redacted to remove any classified information.

The DOJ wrote Congressional leaders this evening.

page 2

Hannity: Good news for Trump, crushing blows for the left

GOP Congressional Leaders Nunes, Gowdy And Goodlatte Release Statement On Comey Memos

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued a statement on the memos later tonight.

The House chairmen note that the memos prove that fired Director Comey never felt obstructed or threatened from his relationship with the president.

And… former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel.

The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence published the statement tonight:

Today House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued the following statement:

“We have long argued former Director Comey’s self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not.

Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated. The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.

The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. While former Director Comey went to great lengths to set dining room scenes, discuss height requirements, describe the multiple times he felt complimented, and myriad other extraneous facts, he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.

The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.

These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.

The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.

Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service