Seth Rich Was a Wikileaks Informant: Seth Rich Murdered

Seth Rich Murdered, Holy Crap! Here Is Video of Hillary Clinton Using Seth Rich to Push Gun Control at Campaign Stop – ABSOLUTELY SICKENING! by Steve of the Tea Party Command Center.


On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”


The Metropolitan police posted a reward for information on Rich’s murder.


In August Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.

Julian Assange also suggested in August that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.

Via Mike Cernovich:


Seth Rich reportedly sent over 44,000 emails to Wikileaks — and then he was murdered!


Here is a video clip of Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail using Democratic operative Seth Rich in a gun control talk.



Views: 106

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Shot several times and once in the back.

Did anyone hear the shots?

Good morning Gregory

Detective: Top Democrat called police, family inquiring about probe into unsolved mystery

WASHINGTON – A top Democratic National Committee official has contacted Washington, D.C., police and the family of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich demanding to know why a homicide detective is examining the unsolved case, a private investigator told WND Tuesday.
Detective Rod Wheeler, who started his investigation into Seth’s death in March, told WND he was stunned Monday when he learned from Rich’s family that the DNC contacted them about the case.

“How did that DNC person know I had called the police? That is what is baffling me,” Wheeler said. “I just found out from [Rich’s] family that the DNC knew I contacted the police – they hadn’t told me that all this time.”

After Wheeler went to the police for insight into Rich’s murder, the detective assigned to the investigation never replied to Wheeler’s inquiry.

“The family said, ‘Rod, there is something that you need to know,” Wheeler explained. “The police detective never called you back because the information was given to the DNC that you called the police trying to figure out what was going on.”

Wheeler, who began working as a homicide detective in 1989, said he is perturbed by the odd reaction the police have when he approaches them with questions about Rich.

Cops in Washington, D.C., he said, suspiciously respond to his inquiries about Rich’s murder with an ominous “blank stare.”

“It’s a blank stare – it’s scary,” he said. “I’m getting nothing from police, just nothing.”

Read more:

Report: Seth Rich Sent More Than 44,000 Emails To WikiLeaks Prior To His Murder

Seth Rich, the Democratic National Committee staffer shot and killed in Washington D.C. last year had leaked tens of thousands of internal DNC emails to WikiLeaks, according to a report by Fox News.

A federal investigator who reviewed a report detailing contents of Rich’s computer generated within a week of his murder said Rich made repeated contact with WikiLeaks through its former director, Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased investigative reporter who was living in London at the time.

“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,” said the investigator, who requested anonymity.

People with damning info on Bill and Hillary shot in public places, no signs of theft

The unsolved case of Democratic National Committee data analyst Seth Rich’s death shares some eerie similarities with many mysterious deaths of individuals linked to former President Bill Clinton and twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Just as in the Rich case, several of the people who died mysterious deaths were shot spontaneously and in public places, sometimes from behind, sometimes by unknown assailants and often just before they were set to release incriminating evidence concerning the Clintons’ activities. In most cases, there were no signs of theft at the crime scenes. And while some of the deaths were ruled suicides, other cases remain a mystery.

The reason the family doesn't want a full and complete investigation looks to me as if they are afraid for themselves.

The reason the police gives Wheeler blank stares may be due to the fear of consequences for speaking.

If it is a political motivated murder then you can count on people that roost very high in the democrat tree of crime and corruption having responsibility written all over their rear ends.  Very high.

I know that it sounds trite but it is nevertheless true, the DNC is run like a Mafia because it is in the same business, that being control, by any means to achieve it and maintain it, and one of the most influential men to give it both policy and procedure was none other than Saul Alinsky.

Alinsky developed his rules by his close association and involvement with the Mob in Chicago, and even became a personal confidant of Frank Nitty. Ayers, Dorne, Obama, and Clinton are disciples, the first two teaching at the University level, Obama a "Harvard Law Constitutional Scholar, former US Senator, and two term President of the United States, with Clinton's resume being First Lady, US Senator, and the Secretary of State, as well as twice running for the Presidency, so please do not think that corruption and criminality are limited to those of an ordinary street bum or the level of Lee Harvey Oswald.

It isn't hard to see why a family  would be afraid of an investigation into the murder of their son, nor is it to see why local police would be reluctant to pursue the truth behind the crime.

Fear has always been a great motivator.  The Mob uses it.

So did Alinsky.

Saul Alinsky


Hillbeast wrote about Rules for Radicals in her college days and carries a copy in her purse.

Alinsky was into Devil worship, he was a idiot, just like Hillary Clinton

Podesta took Hillbeast to satanic rituals.

This is old news... it is obvious that the DC police have done nothing regarding this high profile murder.... neither have the MSM...  I wonder why/?

The FBI would have to be invited by the DC Metro police to investigate this murder... or have other compelling Federal interests as jurisdiction  to pursue this crime... Hell, remember the murder of Vince Foster... it was investigated by the Park Police... as his body was found in a Federal Park.   This is why we must drain the swamp... murder is being routinely sanctioned by what appears to be powerful political interests. 

It is old news. Alinsky died in 1972. Clinton is 70, Obama 50 or 51 (who knows since no valid birth certificate is available) and both Ayers and Dorne were actively involved  in murder, mayhem, and terrorism beginning in the 60's.

All, however, are still engaged with Clinton and Obama having the most influence, and that is very relevant as to what we are enduring today. Namely domestic terrorism, sedition, and open treason, now to the point of the president being accused of, now get this and don't die laughing as I nearly did, Obstruction of Justice, by none other than that little weasel pretending to be a journalist on ABC. I can't think of the name of this dope, but he very fittingly "worked" in the Clinton administration as a gofer.

The FBI has been tainted beyond recognition by Comey, who makes Hoover look like a champion of integrity sponsored investigation in comparison. The Justice department was reduced to a gun running venture, the Secretary of State to a lying incompetent exercise in hooliganism, and the presidency to a phony alien openly expressing his disgust and hatred for America while supporting terrorism, and while cashing his paycheck strutting about like a rooster with a worm.

This old news has repercussions that have only just commenced, and in my opinion warrant the justice department launching a real and a full investigation resulting in the indictment and prosecution of all those who have been seemingly immune to the " long arm of the law."

I know what you meant, Col. Nelson, and it was not to let it go. It was the fact that it has been continuing for so long.

Even more bizarre following bombshell revelation on murdered DNC staffer

WASHINGTON – On the heels of a bombshell revelation that indicated it might have been a Democratic staffer rather than the Russians who hacked the party’s emails, a top investigative reporter is even more puzzled by the FBI’s curious lack of curiosity in perhaps the prime piece of evidence.

Five-time Emmy-award winning reporter Sharyl Attkisson shared her razor-sharp insights with WND on a truly bizarre aspect of the investigation: If the Democratic National Committee, or DNC, claimed its email system was hacked by Russia, why didn’t it let the FBI examine its email server?

And why didn’t the FBI examine the server regardless of whether the DNC objected?

“This has always been befuddling to me,” Attkisson mused.

“If our intel agencies truly believe Russia (or any foreign interest) tried to ‘hack’ our elections or steal emails of the DNC, then it seems to me they would have an obligation in the interest of national security to confiscate and fully examine the evidence, even if the party holding the evidence doesn’t consent,” observed the former chief investigative reporter for CBS News, now the anchor of her own Sunday morning national TV news program, “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.”

She pointedly noted, “The FBI doesn’t need the DNC’s consent to take their equipment and conduct a thorough forensic exam for the security of our nation.”

“The fact that the FBI didn’t press this issue seemed, at the very least, uninquisitive on its part,” Attkisson drolly observed with understatement.

“Based on the FBI’s lack of examining the DNC equipment and its concurrent insistence that Russia did it, and that Russia posed a dire national security threat; we’re left to conclude that the FBI allowed a political party (the DNC) to hamper its ability to secure our nation and mitigate the dire threat.”

“This doesn’t make much sense to me,” she concluded.

These lingering unanswered questions and pertinent observations took on riveting new significance with a sensational revelation Monday, one that lent new credence to the theory that it might not have been the Russians who hacked the DNC.

Instead, it might have been one of the DNC’s own employees, Seth Rich, who provided key emails embarrassing to the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

Read more:




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service