©2018 Burt Prelutsky
If you want to respond to Burt... burtprelutsky@icloud .com 

Of all the nonsense that has been generated since Donald Trump’s divinely-inspired victory in 2016, probably the silliest has involved scumbag/commie-John Brennan’s finally losing his security clearance.

The fact is that nobody has satisfactorily explained why any former member of the federal government shouldn’t automatically lose his or her clearance after leaving the job. Those who have made the attempt have been forced to suggest it’s because current members of the Trump administration might wish to pick the brains of their predecessors. When I first heard that theory expressed, I thought it was a joke. But it turned out I was the only person laughing.

Can you imagine any situation when Mike Pompeo, John Bolton or Dan Coats would say to himself: “I wonder what scumbag/commie-John Brennan,  scumbag-James Clapper, Andrew McCabe, scumbag-James Comey, Peter Strzok. Michael Hayden thinks about this. I better give the genius a call”?

A far better question is why any of these people ever got the job in the first place. That is particularly true when it comes to scumbag/commie-John Brennan, who went directly from the CIA to MSNBC, showing an unnatural affinity for initials. I have to wonder how a man who, in the 1976 presidential election, in the midst of the Cold War, cast his ballot for the man who was on the Soviet payroll, Gus Hall, could possibly be entrusted to oversee our national security.

Louisiana’s Senator John Kennedy, who, alone among members of Congress, has a gift for the bon mot, refers toscumbag/commie-Brennan as a butthead.

If you listened to the other buttheads on TV, including Carl Bernstein, Mark Warner, Richard Blumenthal and scumbag-James Clapper, you would have thought that denying security clearance to a Never-Trumper who is currently employed at a cable news network was tantamount to blowing up the Washington Monument.

Some called it “Nixonian” and referred to it as “unprecedented,” seemingly unaware of the fact that if Richard Nixon had done something similar, it could not also be unprecedented.

We even had a retired admiral, William McRaven, who was so upset at the idea of scumbag/commie-Brennan’s being publicly shamed that the nincompoop asked that his own clearance be revoked. I had initially misspelled the admiral’s name, believing it was McCraven, which, all things considered, is what it should have been.

If I had his ear, I would tell the admiral that unless he was currently working for the federal government and could be trusted to keep a secret, he should not have security clearance. And judging by his loony and disloyal comment, I’d say he never should have had it.

Security clearance should not be confused with the gold watch they hand retirees on their way out the door.

What is truly unprecedented is that the former head of the CIA would label a sitting President a traitor, meaningscumbag/commie-Brennan believes that President Trump should be tried, found guilty and executed.

One of the more amusing things said aboutscumbag/commie-Brennan’s losing his security clearance is that it was done to silence him. This is a guy who immediately got to defend himself with a self-serving editorial in the New York Times and appearances on every anti-Trump cable news show on television.

I wish someone would silence me that way.

⦿  Speaking of questions, I have a few I rarely if ever hear being asked of left-wingers, even when they dare wander off the reservation and show up on Fox News.

Why are people still having abortions all these years after the invention of the Pill, sex education in schools and other readily-available birth control devices? Wouldn’t it be cheaper and more humane in the long run if Planned Parenthood provided sterilization procedures instead of abortions?

Why is it that Socialism invariably turns into totalitarianism and how is it that Socialists never seem to recognize that fact?

Why is it that no matter which Party is in power, political scofflaws are so rarely indicted for their crimes?

Why are dummycrats-Democrats always attacking the super-rich when nearly all of the super-rich aredummycrats-Democrats?

Why, if strict gun control laws are the solution to gun violence, is there so much gun violence in the places with the strictest gun control laws?

If Russian meddling in our elections is as big a deal as thedummycrats-Democrats claim, why is it that President scumbag/liar-nObama did nothing about it? Why is it that, instead, he promised to be increasingly flexible where Russia was concerned after the 2012 election? And why is it that his national defense team, which consisted of such super patriots as scumbag-James Clapper,scumbag/commie-John Brennan, Michael Hayden,scumbag-James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Susan Rice, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Bruce Ohr and Loretta Lynch, didn’t send up a flare?

How is it that dummycrats-Democrats are able to claim with a straight face that illegal aliens are more law-abiding and harder workers than the rest of us when they all broke the law when they snuck across the border and half of them are dependent on our tax dollars to survive?

Why are anchor babies the only people in America, at least aside from politicians, who are allowed to profit from the commission of a crime?

I happen to know the answers, not because I’m so smart, but because the answers are so obvious that even Nancy Pulosi could come up with them if you put her on the rack or told her that not only are plastic straws outlawed, but, unless she comes clean, so is plastic surgery.

⦿  Even though the leaders of the dummycrats-Democratic Party are nearly as old as I am, they will be relieved to know that their eventual replacements are already on the scene, and I’m not merely referring to commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In Baltimore, an 11-year-old 6th grader, Mariana Taylor, is already showing signs that she’s ready to accept the baton from Pulosi and run with it.

During the Pledge of Allegiance, she remained seated. She admits she got her inspiration from Colin Kaepernick, stating: “He stood up for what he believed in even though he could get fired.”

You can see why I believe she is more than ready to take a leadership role in the dummycrats-Democratic Party. Clearly, if Kaepernick had stood up, we wouldn’t be stuck with all these moronic copycats in the NFL and our 6th grade classrooms.

⦿  Although we are all aware of the fact that California elects the goofiest politicians in America, closely followed by New York and Illinois, you ignore Minnesota at your own risk.

I suspect that, like me, you assumed that once creepy Al Franken was forced to resign from the Senate, Minnesota would go back to just being famous for having artificial body parts and accessories among its major exports.

But when it comes to political oddities, Minnesota doesn’t have to take a backseat to anyone. In the recent primary election to select an Attorney General, a majority of its citizens decided that not even reports of having repeatedly committed domestic violence was enough to prevent them from selecting scumbag-Keith Ellison to be the state’s primary law enforcement official.

But they weren’t through. In a special election to replace Rep. scumbag-Ellison, a Muslim, in Congress, thedummycrats-Democrats selected another Muslim named Ilhan Omar to represent the district.

Ms. Omar, an immigrant from Somalia, was apparently never married to the man who sired her children, but either is or was married to her brother.

Point, set and match, to Minnesota.

⦿  But not even Minnesota has a monopoly on political oddities. In Georgia, a former congressional candidate in the 10th district, Kellie Collins, a zealot when it comes to gun control laws, shot and killed her former campaign treasurer, Curtis Cain.

Clearly, a classic case of do as I say, not as I do.

⦿  Some people have asked why it is I write so often. It’s because people in and around politics keep saying and doing so much really dumb shit.

For instance, in an effort to stop having to jail people of color so often, Congress is looking to reduce jail time for those engaged in drug trafficking. If that doesn’t achieve the desired results, they will simply pass a law making drug trafficking legal.

It wouldn't be unprecedented. After all, that is how they've seen fit to tackle the problem of illegal immigration.
If you want to respond to Burt... burtprelutsky@icloud .com 

Views: 200

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You will need to Get this Tea Party web site up and rolling like it was when Obama was screwing America. BY getting stories out to the public instead of just letting it move along by who ever wants to write a blog about something. This site is a mear shadow of what it once was. I feel like i'm the only person in America commenting on the present dangers we face. 


 Stephen, I guess you need to book mark this page at this site, and this is just one blogging areas:

To clarify Tif,

This website pre 2016 would run issued the UBER Liberal Left was pushing trying to force through congress and pointing the finger at various Liberal politicians...EXAMPLES: Obama and his agenda--Jerry (THE SKYS FALLING GLOBAL WARMING) Brown, Hillary, Eric Holder, Tom Perez and company at any rate the list goes on and on.

THEN Tea Party members would comment. The format is not the same, and I feel its watered down. The left reads this web site so lets let them hear our concernes Tif/Rudy etal

Here below is a comment fro Franklin Graham about the issue of Faith & God within the Democrat party. Maybe others can comment on WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND WHY ARE THEY LIKE THIS???

A lot of Democrats do not agree with the democratic partys platform and former President Obama's agenda--SO to lump it all into a PROGRESSIVE POT OF SOCIALISTIC SOUP LETS VIEW IT AND COMMENT. (see below)


I really don't care about the dummycrats-dem party. It s a party of losers and mobs. My concerns are upon the republican party that will continue to make things alot better for America.

The GOP leadership is acting to stop Trump from defending the borders from invasion... they will not let him deploy the Military on the border to stop the current caravan of over 5000 individuals coming out of Central America... this is an invasion and the US Constitution provides the President with all the authority he needs to defend our borders...

See: Article 4, Section 4 and Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 for the Constitutional Authority to deploy military force in the event of an invasion... this is the separate and supreme law of the land ... and any Congressional act to the contrary is void. 

It is time for the President to act... call for a national emergency and declare martial law along the Southern Border... order the National Guard from the Border States to mobilize and repel the invasion.. if the Governors or any officers of the State or Federal Government refuse to follow the Presidents orders arrest them, and charge them with high treason... acting to support a foreign invading force.

Any attempt by Congress to impeach the President over this should be met with massive, massive, public outcry, unrest and protests demanding all of those seeking impeachment be arrested for treason and tried.

For more on this see:


How can gop stop the commander in chief from ordering military to not obey his command? He is the leader of the military. and gop or dummycrats-dem can't stop him.

Read the full article at link below... However, in short, the GOP leadership claims that statutory authority requires Trump to obtain Congress's approval to use US Troops on US Soil ... too enforce US Law.  That is true, only if martial law is not imposed and an invasion is not being repelled. The Posse Coma Tatus Statutes were meant to limit US forces from assuming local police powers whenever the civil authority was capable of imposing law and order... in an invasion that doesn't apply.

If Trump chooses to acquiesce to Congress's claims/demands... and abdicates his power to use the US Military, the Constitution will not matter or help.  What is needed is for Trump to inform the GOP leaders of his Constitutional powers to mobilize the US Military in defense of our borders... and if necessary to ARREST CONGRESS FOR TREASON, once he declares a national emergency to repel an invasion along the border.  In other words Pres. Trump must get tough and he must be ready to arrest large numbers of Congress and others in the government for treason.

Pres. Trump, however, may want to avoid a constitutional crisis just before November's election cycle.  We will have to see what he does.  He has the authority to mobilize the US Military and the National Guard... he doesn't need Congress or the Governors... in fact, he can have them arrested for interfering with defending our borders... for treason.  We need an Abraham Lincoln willing to put rebellious government officials in jail.

Full Article:

P/S... Look the Deep State has been misleading Trump regarding his powers as President... attempting to keep him under control.  They are going to lie to him about his right and constitutional powers to mobilize and defend our borders... they will threaten him with legal action and impeachment... he needs to know that it will take a defining move... too drain the swamp ... before he is able to look to the bureaucracy and the Congress for support on issues that buck the core goals of the Deep State... and its new world order allies.

America is at war for its very soul... internally and externally... and Pres. Trump must find a way to defeat our enemies foreign and domestic... simultaneously. 


President Trump does not need approval of Congress to place troops on the Border.

 He just needs to arrange it as if they are training on our borders, that way if more cross the border carrying weapons, the Opps is in and the troops are there.

 A simple fix to Congress vs. Trump.

Pres. Trump has the Constitutional power and DUTY to defend our borders... he has all the power necessary to declare a state of emergency along our Southern Border. He can also declare a state of Martial Law along the border and say 5-10 miles inland from the border... for the purposes of providing the US Military with lawful jurisdiction to administer justice and keep order over all things within the area under Martial Law.

It is not a question of the President's authority to order the Military to secure our borders.. It is, however, a political question... Whether, he can keep enough support to defend against IMPEACHMENT, if he bucks his own Party Leadership, and if he is willing to take that risk.  

As I stated earlier... we need Abraham Lincoln... a President who was willing to jail members of Congress, the Administration, and the several States for refusing to follow his orders in a time of war... and we are at war for the very soul of our nation... We are at war to preserve our way of life, our Constitutional Republic is threatened by the new world order, and the progressives in both Parties are out to Fundamentally Transform America... to fundamentally change America... without getting the people to consent to such changes or by following the Constitutional process for such change... Article V of the US Constitution.

Here is the new link to main article for GOP leadership refusing to let Trump stop the caravan of illegal aliens head to the US.


@Stephen, That may be so, but we have found where more Republicans are in the hip pocket of the Dems, from the EU, so my comment was to you, that blogs are going up, so look at them, share them or not.

 I think I will make a blog out of this Ronald,

 A real nice blog, its simple and it will work, and I all ready know all the other stuff you posted.





Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel


CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.


“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service