Secret Service Agent Who Won’t Take A Bullet for Trump Removed from Position

Conservative Tribune -


A top Secret Service agent who said on Facebook that she wouldn’t take a bullet for President Donald Trump has been removed from her position, the Washington Examiner reported.

Kerry O’Grady was the special agent in charge of the Denver district, meaning she was in charge of supervising all of the president’s visits to the area. However, she caused quite a scandal last October when she implied she would not protect Trump.

“As a public servant for nearly 23 years, I struggle not to violate the Hatch Act. So I keep quiet and skirt the median,” O’Grady wrote in a Facebook post first discovered by the Washington Examiner. “To do otherwise can be a criminal offense for those in my position. Despite the fact that I am expected to take a bullet for both sides.”

“But this world has changed and I have changed. And I would take jail time over a bullet or an endorsement for what I believe to be disaster to this country and the strong and amazing women and minorities who reside here.

“Hatch Act be damned,” she concluded. “I am with Her.”

The Hatch Act stipulates, among other things, that federal employees “may not post a comment to a blog or a social media site that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group” or “may not use any email account or social media to distribute, send or forward content that advocates for or against a partisan political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group.”

O’Grady, who claimed to be a sexual assault victim, said she was reacting to accusations that Trump had sexually assaulted women.

While the Secret Service was aware of the postings, O’Grady was not removed until the Examiner discovered the comments. Then she was temporarily removed pending an investigation. The Examiner confirmed Sunday that removal would be permanent.

However, several agents expressed concern to the Examiner that she would be allowed to remain within the Department of Homeland Security and thus maintain her pension.

The idea that anyone who says she wouldn’t be willing to take a bullet for the one individual whom she’s supposed to protect would be allowed to stay within a department whose chief function is our security is beyond me, but the rationale of the federal government has never been terribly coherent.

That said, the fact that O’Grady has been removed is the important thing. The Secret Service shouldn’t tolerate personnel who will disregard the safety of the president for personal political reasons.

Views: 32

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Why not FIRED? She certainly deserves that as a remedy.

The Secret Service has been in the news in the past few days or weeks for violating their duties and their oaths of office

It all goes back to the facts of for the past 8 years lawlessness within our government and their many 'people' who work for the government think they have the right to do as they please not to the good of our nation but for their own good. 

Goes back - or before - to the SS in South America under Hillary Clinton using our tax money to pay for hookers, to this woman stating  “Hatch Act be damned,” ... “I am with Her.”  to the 'being walked out of the White House' of several SS employees, to the loss of the lap-top computer out of a SS vehicle, upon which is exacuation plans for The President of The United States, and other classified information from her/his drive-way in New York City.

Draining the Swamp is going to be a lot more difficult than what most of We The People think, is going to take, some within the administration of President Trump a lot of head-slapping, sleepless nights and yes a lot of financial worry. 

Daily Dispatch - Tuesday, March 21, 2017






Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service