First, United Nations officials label bacon and deli meats as carcinogens, and now scientists are claiming that higher concentrations of carbon dioxide are not only heating the planet, they’re making people dumber.

new study by the Harvard School of Public Health claims “carbon dioxide (CO2) has a direct and negative impact on human cognition and decision-making,” according to ThinkProgress, a left-wing advocacy website.

Former Vice President Al Gore wasted no time tweeting out ThinkProgress’ in-depth article, trying to link higher carbon dioxide levels to lower cognition in humans.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/27/scientists-claim-high-co2-levels-...

Views: 462

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sounds like more crackpot nonsense so the phony climate change people can continue on their road to steal money from hard working Americans.  On the other hand, world governments have to stop the destruction of the planet's rain forests which God made for all of us and from which we all benefit.

Christine

if you're referring to the belief that the rainforests are the lungs of earth, you might find it interesting that satellite data shows rainforests are self contained environments; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSRgKKoLLiQ

It's a two hour Nova show, interesting stuff throughout. Plankton is more the lungs of earth than rainforests are.

World governments are actually the problem, not the solution. The very core of their land management 'settled science' is assbackwards wrong, and causing desertification of large swaths of earth's growing temperature belt;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI

it's only 22 minutes long, and very telling about how government is NOT the solution

Sorry, let's face it, it's the education al system that's making them dumber.

Leaded gasoline did a lot more damage then CO2 ever will. We exhale Co2!  it is a natural substance and part of human breathing.

I submit to you that people that eat food all die. Is food the cause?

Think Progress is a George Soros financed group!

Another think tank of fools. These scientists really seem to think that they are so much smarter than the average person. Just to get another government grant, which incidentally comes out of we the peoples wallets. Pretty sad.

So they're basing this on 24 people (who were probably already dumb) exposed to different levels of CO2 for 6 days. Betting that cost Taxpayers huge $$$$. Nevermind, it all boils down to control & $$$$.

Sorry that honor goes to public education not CO2

There may be some truth to this. Look how many people actually believe everything these nuts say and are willing to pay their hard earned cash for it. After all, it could not have anything to do with the Democrat run education system.

These people are IDIOTS. God made this world.He knew exactly what he was doing with the first blueprint. If people think about the life cycle of weather God was the perfect artist. Think about the water cycle.A complete evaporation collector the clouds, As clouds move by winds along the way they scrub the air, Picking up dust.Then when they get dirty and heavy it rains.Then the rain soaks in to a filter, The dirt,water moves in the soil till it finds a resting place.Also feeding the other part of our natural filter.The trees and bushes, Capturing CO2 emissions, pollution Gathered from the air by the winds moving the branches and leaves in the wind.And as a thank you the trees give us oxygen.The perfect machine.Point blank.

This link takes you to a more believable Harvard study..... a 12 year study of 100,000 people that demonstrates conservatives have significantly higher IQ's than liberals. It offers an explanation for this studies experts

https://iahymnewsnetwork.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/new-study-shows-l...

That explains the decisions coming from the Whitehouse

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service