Sarah Palin: Speaker Ryan Proves He Is Out of Touch When He Jumps to Condemn Trump on Islamic Threat

AP Photo/Cliff OwenFormer Alaska governor Sarah Palin blasted House Speaker Paul Ryan for his gutless reaction on radical Islamic terrorism — and for his criticisms of presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump on Islam — during an exclusive interview with Stephen K. Bannon on Breitbart News Sunday on SiriusXM.

Ryan has barely condemned the terrorist attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando killed 50 and landed another 53 in the hospital.

Paul Ryan is out of touch with his constituents,” said the former GOP vice presidential candidate. “Those who have put their faith in with their sacred vote.”

Leaders like Ryan have not come up with the plan or the will to confront the threat, she said. “What is the number of lives lost before our leadership will wake up and deal with the problem?”

read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/12/palin-sp...

Views: 473

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Whenever the Left snootily invokes the ignorant claim that Governor Palin is "out of touch," she proves - once again - that it's not Sarah Palin who's out of touch, but our gutless political class.  Indeed, as she asks, "How many people need to lose their lives (to Islamic terrorism) before our 'leadership' will wake up and deal with the problem?"

Let's be real here, until the muslim in the white house us gone it will never be called what it really is

Again I say we have it wrong... It is not "Radical Islam" it is "Islam"! Islam is a government and all who are accepting them in their country are opening the DOOR TO INVADERS" WAKE UP PEOPLE AND SEE THE INVADERS THAT ARE BEING LET IN TO KILL AND DESTROY!  God is seeking sinners to repent and trust Jesus not to kill them but to give them life eternal! John 3:16; Eph 2:8-10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8tIZJP6Fr0

I agree Barry, it is Islam.....Even Erdogan said that there is no radical or moderate Islam - just Islam.

However, until Obama leaves office nothing will change. He will defend his religion and his brethren until the end.

Brian,
Obama isn't going to send the military aginist Islam. He said long before he was elected or should I say through voter fraud placed in the office of president, that if the winds start to blow aginist the Muslim people he would side with them.

Perhaps that was because he is here to cause as much damage to America as possible. Obama has studied Islam, lived Islam and supported Islam all his life. If he wasn't planning to do the things he has done you might say he's the most unluckiest man ever. Mr. Obama was without a doubt a Muslim before he became the president.

As for Sarah Palin she hasn't been wrong about anything she has said over the years.

RADICAL means your nuts enough to go into a night club in the NAME of islam and yell some trash out then KILL 50 people for no other reason than they are gay and having a good time. That is RADICAL ISLAM....................

I have a girlfriend that keeps trying to tell me there are bad muslims and good muslims.  And I keep asking...When was the last time you heard a "good" muslim speak out against radical muslims?   ----uh---like------NEVER?   And my comment to her is the difference between radical muslims and moderate muslims is:   The radical muslim wants to lop off your head, and the moderate muslims wants the radical muslims to lop off your head....

Radical Islam is the religious cult of those persons bent on destroying Western civilization in all its forms.  It makes no difference if the terrorists are killing Christians, or homosexuals.  Anyone who is not Muslim adhering to the tenets of Islamic beliefs, are killed just as quickly as westerners.  "peaceful" Muslims are killed just as quickly regardless.  To say killing homosexuals is proof of radical islam is so untrue....if it were simply a matter of killing off homosexuals, that would be one thing.  But it's not...it's killing everyone who isn't a Muslim nutcase.

 - He didn't "condemn" he said banning ALL Muslims is not rational, basically, and Trump HAD made far too broad a statement... which a responsible "Leader" can't stand behind, period... Also, Palin shouldn't have to be wrongfully TRASHING our Top Republicans so as to support Trump, period... never mind set-out to UnSeat him from Congress... She's lost most all of the Respect I'd had for her...

Peter you write like a liberal lefty! I am not sure of your motive. But I will tell you this. I am a Christian and this attack on these gay individuals was atrocious. I do not and will never believe in their lifestyle. Yet to brutally murder innocent people in this fashion is ungodly and is never called for.

We do not have a vetting process in this country and there are far too many young men wanting refuge from their country we need to arm them and allow them to fight to remain in Syria. If they are not willing to fight for their country then why should we allow them to walk in to other countries around the world and then fight to change our way of life in our country.

We need to work with other countries to create safe havens over in Syria and after the war is over to assimilate back in to their own land.   

So Peter N Gauvin you need to stay on the real facts and understand many would be called Top Republicans and Democrats have turned a blind eye and are allow too many Americans to die innocently because of their lack of accountability and responsibility on this matter.

WE ARE AT WAR WETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!!! It is so so sad but it is reality!!! 

Bob

just fyi

Peter's past posts indicate he's thoroughly a dedicated R party loyalist 1st, no hint of what's 2nd priority to him. R party leaders are incapable of doing wrong, and criticizing them is sacrilege.

And who the hell said we need to or are going to ban all Muslims!  THE LEFT, Mr. Jerk.  Trump has NEVER said ban all Muslims...he said the US MUST have a plan to sift through the incredible influx of Muslims to determine who is or is not a terrorist.  The fact is, we KNOW Islamic terrorists are entering the country with Syrian refugees...the Trojan Horse of modern times, and you're complaining about sorting out the terrorists?

Palin is NOT wrongfully trashing Ryan, he needs a damn good kick in the ass.  He's the Speaker of the House and mealy-mouthing his way to re-election and doesn't want to "offend" anyone.  He's a spineless coward who hasn't realized yet that HE is the problem.  Whether you like it or not, THE PEOPLE have chosen Donald Trump to represent them from the Oval Office...those in Congress or other political office who can't deal with the people's choice need to remove themselves from office.  They are throwing the race of their own party because the baby sore losers didn't see their candidate make the grade! They're handing the oval office to a criminal under FBI investigation so they can turn around and say, see, we told you!

The People aren't that stupid, Peter. It's only fools like yourself who don't recognize reality.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service