Sarah Palin: Speaker Ryan Proves He Is Out of Touch When He Jumps to Condemn Trump on Islamic Threat

AP Photo/Cliff OwenFormer Alaska governor Sarah Palin blasted House Speaker Paul Ryan for his gutless reaction on radical Islamic terrorism — and for his criticisms of presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump on Islam — during an exclusive interview with Stephen K. Bannon on Breitbart News Sunday on SiriusXM.

Ryan has barely condemned the terrorist attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando killed 50 and landed another 53 in the hospital.

Paul Ryan is out of touch with his constituents,” said the former GOP vice presidential candidate. “Those who have put their faith in with their sacred vote.”

Leaders like Ryan have not come up with the plan or the will to confront the threat, she said. “What is the number of lives lost before our leadership will wake up and deal with the problem?”

read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/12/palin-sp...

Views: 471

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Whenever the Left snootily invokes the ignorant claim that Governor Palin is "out of touch," she proves - once again - that it's not Sarah Palin who's out of touch, but our gutless political class.  Indeed, as she asks, "How many people need to lose their lives (to Islamic terrorism) before our 'leadership' will wake up and deal with the problem?"

Let's be real here, until the muslim in the white house us gone it will never be called what it really is

Again I say we have it wrong... It is not "Radical Islam" it is "Islam"! Islam is a government and all who are accepting them in their country are opening the DOOR TO INVADERS" WAKE UP PEOPLE AND SEE THE INVADERS THAT ARE BEING LET IN TO KILL AND DESTROY!  God is seeking sinners to repent and trust Jesus not to kill them but to give them life eternal! John 3:16; Eph 2:8-10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8tIZJP6Fr0

I agree Barry, it is Islam.....Even Erdogan said that there is no radical or moderate Islam - just Islam.

However, until Obama leaves office nothing will change. He will defend his religion and his brethren until the end.

Brian,
Obama isn't going to send the military aginist Islam. He said long before he was elected or should I say through voter fraud placed in the office of president, that if the winds start to blow aginist the Muslim people he would side with them.

Perhaps that was because he is here to cause as much damage to America as possible. Obama has studied Islam, lived Islam and supported Islam all his life. If he wasn't planning to do the things he has done you might say he's the most unluckiest man ever. Mr. Obama was without a doubt a Muslim before he became the president.

As for Sarah Palin she hasn't been wrong about anything she has said over the years.

RADICAL means your nuts enough to go into a night club in the NAME of islam and yell some trash out then KILL 50 people for no other reason than they are gay and having a good time. That is RADICAL ISLAM....................

I have a girlfriend that keeps trying to tell me there are bad muslims and good muslims.  And I keep asking...When was the last time you heard a "good" muslim speak out against radical muslims?   ----uh---like------NEVER?   And my comment to her is the difference between radical muslims and moderate muslims is:   The radical muslim wants to lop off your head, and the moderate muslims wants the radical muslims to lop off your head....

Radical Islam is the religious cult of those persons bent on destroying Western civilization in all its forms.  It makes no difference if the terrorists are killing Christians, or homosexuals.  Anyone who is not Muslim adhering to the tenets of Islamic beliefs, are killed just as quickly as westerners.  "peaceful" Muslims are killed just as quickly regardless.  To say killing homosexuals is proof of radical islam is so untrue....if it were simply a matter of killing off homosexuals, that would be one thing.  But it's not...it's killing everyone who isn't a Muslim nutcase.

 - He didn't "condemn" he said banning ALL Muslims is not rational, basically, and Trump HAD made far too broad a statement... which a responsible "Leader" can't stand behind, period... Also, Palin shouldn't have to be wrongfully TRASHING our Top Republicans so as to support Trump, period... never mind set-out to UnSeat him from Congress... She's lost most all of the Respect I'd had for her...

Peter you write like a liberal lefty! I am not sure of your motive. But I will tell you this. I am a Christian and this attack on these gay individuals was atrocious. I do not and will never believe in their lifestyle. Yet to brutally murder innocent people in this fashion is ungodly and is never called for.

We do not have a vetting process in this country and there are far too many young men wanting refuge from their country we need to arm them and allow them to fight to remain in Syria. If they are not willing to fight for their country then why should we allow them to walk in to other countries around the world and then fight to change our way of life in our country.

We need to work with other countries to create safe havens over in Syria and after the war is over to assimilate back in to their own land.   

So Peter N Gauvin you need to stay on the real facts and understand many would be called Top Republicans and Democrats have turned a blind eye and are allow too many Americans to die innocently because of their lack of accountability and responsibility on this matter.

WE ARE AT WAR WETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT!!! It is so so sad but it is reality!!! 

Bob

just fyi

Peter's past posts indicate he's thoroughly a dedicated R party loyalist 1st, no hint of what's 2nd priority to him. R party leaders are incapable of doing wrong, and criticizing them is sacrilege.

And who the hell said we need to or are going to ban all Muslims!  THE LEFT, Mr. Jerk.  Trump has NEVER said ban all Muslims...he said the US MUST have a plan to sift through the incredible influx of Muslims to determine who is or is not a terrorist.  The fact is, we KNOW Islamic terrorists are entering the country with Syrian refugees...the Trojan Horse of modern times, and you're complaining about sorting out the terrorists?

Palin is NOT wrongfully trashing Ryan, he needs a damn good kick in the ass.  He's the Speaker of the House and mealy-mouthing his way to re-election and doesn't want to "offend" anyone.  He's a spineless coward who hasn't realized yet that HE is the problem.  Whether you like it or not, THE PEOPLE have chosen Donald Trump to represent them from the Oval Office...those in Congress or other political office who can't deal with the people's choice need to remove themselves from office.  They are throwing the race of their own party because the baby sore losers didn't see their candidate make the grade! They're handing the oval office to a criminal under FBI investigation so they can turn around and say, see, we told you!

The People aren't that stupid, Peter. It's only fools like yourself who don't recognize reality.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.

Watch:

“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service