Russian Intelligence, Barack Obama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Dmitry Medvedev, Vladimir Putin

Russian Intelligence, Barack Obama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Dmitry Medvedev, Vladimir Putin

KGB Propaganda now in on presidential race

Author
- Judi McLeod  Thursday, June 14, 2012

In the 1950s, school children were taught how to crouch under their desks during air raid drills. The Lib-Left of the day ridiculed the drills as Cold War paranoia.
Who knew back then that celebrities would pre-fund $3.5 million for a soft landing to the Gorbachev Foundation for a move into a new, white shingled bay-front house at the historic Presidio overlooking San Francisco’s Golden Bridge? From his scenic, paid-for digs former Soviet Union leader Mikhail Gorbachev began systematically dismantling America’s military bases.

Who knew during the Cold War that one far off day, a pro-Russia, anti-American president would be caught on camera mic boasting to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would soon have the ‘flexibility’ to make a deal on ballistic missile defenses in Europe, while boasting of an already assured reelection victory?


Nothing in James Bond flicks could ever come close to the real shudders down the spine so many felt in hearing the picked up by microphone whispered message to Medvedev from a president whose unabashed mission has been and remains to be, the Total Transformation of America.


Pope John Paul II, Ronald Reagan and Maggie Thatcher were all prescient and willing to do something to warn the free masses about the inherent evil of Communist Russia.

Courageous Pope John Paul II, who as Karol Wojtyla, celebrated Mass within range of Soviet rifles, proudly wore the earned honour of being the Kremlin’s Public Enemy No. 1. Reagan’s noble, immortal command, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall” still rings in the human heart decades after he first uttered it.


All these heroes of our time knew that by the time the Free World celebrated the fall of the Big Tree of Communism, its roots had already spread to fertile pockets of the West.
Nothing has significantly changed in the Russian agenda. Gorbachev is given free rein fomenting for revolution on American soil; coldblooded, former KGB agent Vladimir Putin is now President of Russia.


Though, you won’t see it on the nightly news, bloodthirsty to spread propaganda about blood in the streets of America, the KGB is in on the American presidential election.
“According to the Kremlin, blood has already been spilled.” (Douglas V. Gibbs, Canada Free Press, June 14, 2012).


“Then again, this is the same propaganda arm of the Russian government that used to show images of Skid Row to Russians, claiming that was a typical scene in the United States.”
The deliberate spread of propaganda in quest of completing a Marxist-Socialist agenda is common on today’s Worldwide Web.


Faux stories like the one in which The Russian Federal Security Service allegedly reports that last week a “violent” battle erupted in Michigan between American rebels, and military personnel loyal to the Obama Regime—including a casualty list of at least 380 men, women and children among 500 gathered, in a rally against America’s “slide towards a totalitarian dictatorship”, are proof positive that Russian intelligence service or their agents will play a big part in what they hope is the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama.
Like their friends in the Obama regime, Russian Intelligence work to kill off Tea Party popularity.


According to the Russian report, the purpose of the gathering of patriots was to “form a 50-State alliance of local law enforcement and political officers seeking to turn the tide of their nation’s path towards dictatorship even, should it be necessary, by armed force.”
In layman’s terms, Russia is stirring the pot. This time with the potency of its celebrated rot-gut vodka.Some people will believe the Russian propaganda if only because they want to believe it.

Right out of Conspiracy 101 were the supposed KGB claims of airstrikes over Michigan, “the largest being a 2,000 lb. laser-guided bomb that hit in the middle of those gathered at the rally killing over three quarters of them instantly”.


Like proverbial spies yearning to come in out of the cold through the gateway of the USA, Communist Russia, Socialist France and their sidekick radical Islam nations, are all chafing at the bit to get Obama re-elected this November.


But while they have Obama swimming in their shark tank, they haven’t seen that he’s really a puppet-stringed paper tiger who excels not in anything substantial but only in shooting basketball hoops, swinging golf clubs and shilling for $3 donations from life’s little people.

Views: 750

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have believed for a long time that Obama is a Russian tool managed on their behalf by the Saudi's

Russia and China between them are dividing up their "empires" and use the their mid east clients as foot soldiers against us

And Gorby despite his capitalistic ways is doing his part to repair the damage he caused Mother Russia when he gave up Communist control of the USSR and it's satellites back in 89-91

Finally I am amazed at the credibilty given to RT the Russian tv service

Often I find it quite truthful, but it is a pronaganda  arm of Moscow

Well isn't Russia where lumumba college is, where radical anti american leaders are trained such as fidel Castro And hugo Chavez.
BlancaNieves's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dans la France profonde
Posts: 3,804
Blog Entries: 1
BlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant futureBlancaNieves has a brilliant future
Default Barry Soetoro at Patrice Lumumba People's Friendship University?

Was this "our" Barry Soetoro?
Quote:
HAS THE CIA CREATED A PAST FOR OBAMA TO HIDE HIS ACTIVITIES FROM 1981 TO 1983?Columbia University claims here that Obama was a graduate of that institution in 1983. However, to date, none of his college records or theses have been made available to the public. Columbia’s statement places equal emphasis on Obama’s being the “first African American elected President of the United States” and his alleged graduation from the institution, and it does not discuss Obama’s coursework or contributions to Columbia while attending….
Again, if the CIA was behind it, they would be involved in every single aspect of it, because the money that he was getting went to help the Mujahadeen fight the Russian invasion. Here’s another really interesting thing: the story is out there that he attended Patrice Lamumba University. About three weeks ago, I finally found the website for Patrice Lamumba, and it said, “Distinguished Alumni,” and on the list was “Barry Soetoro.”
The above was from The Post and Mail.com which doesn't appear to be working at the moment, however, the link to the article is here.
Mikhail Kryzhanovsky. "Barack Obama and KGB".

Well done!

When you told me about Lumumba a few months ago you planted a seed .  Now everytime I mention it new info pops up.  We have work to do. lol

Like all good stories on Obama, Google prevents you reading them

Link not available as of 5 secs ago

On the network Mikhailo is represented as "brilliant superspy", "the most powerful (dangerous) spy in the world", "eminent political scientist of world renown", "the founder of Applied Political Science", "author of the top political management", "founder of the online Institute U.S. national security", which "could become the president of Russia" and has become a "US president de facto", etc.
Positioning itself as a "connoisseur" and "expert" on the widest range of issues, "Who rules USA: Obama or Kryzhanovsky?", "Gestapo Muller-alive. Mysteries KGB", "Vladimir Vysotsky - a KGB agent", "Secrets of the KGB" , "The Murder of Bill Clinton: CIA plot", "How to Kill Obama?" etc. balderdash.

About the "genius superspy", "an outstanding scientist of world renown" and "US president de facto" at the same time

http://www.articlesbase.com/news-and-society-articles/about-the-gen...

Well, to the outsider, America's achilles tendon has always been a certain well intentioned naivete.  Since it springs from a unique and profound spirituality and plain old fashioned good heartedness, no matter how it is exploited and distorted, good will always prevail.

Was Reagan taken in by Gorby?  Hard to believe?  Was JPII taken in by Gorby?  Hard to believe?

Did they warily respond to the suffering of the Communist kontrolled nations and say "Tear that wall down" unaware that a mega putsch would be made to extend it?  Or did they just say "Take it down" and we'll deal with the consequences as they arise?

"We at the UN..." FDR circa 1946

I'd lay money Obama attended  Friendship Uni

In that "open mike " situ he was talking to a handler

in this instance Medvedev

More then crazy

Who was it that stated on the news the other night that nobody has seen a communist in 50 years. It may have been a republican im not sure. But either he's stupid or he's in on it too. He was being sarcastic and trying to discredit our communist theory. And he spouted that out. Which one was he?

That was Bill Clinton, except he said for over a decade. What is apparent in that statement is that he naively believes Communists have reformed. Clinton's remarks also reflect the lefts indifference towards and often support of Communism. Recall that the Clintons said during the 1990s that Congressman Sanders (an admitted Socialist, registered as an Independent) helped balance the "extreme" views of the Republicans. Clinton views himself as centrist! The only position conservative position that I recall him taking is support of capital punishment, that was hardly relevant to his Presidency.

He just wanted, I am certain, to let the general public know that the communists in this country have not called themselves communists since the mid-fifties and early sixties.  They are SDS, the Westher Underground, Tides, Christians for Democratic Society, and on and on and on.  They divide up themselves and call themselves by names that do not remotely sound communist or marxist.  There were over forty of them listed over a years ago, but all were doing the same ideological things.  George Soros has been a major contributor to all of them, for he is trying to bring revolution to the United States.  Pray for this country--One Nation Under God.  +++

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

The cartoonist's homepage, indystar.com/opinion/varvel

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service