Business advocates who want to import more foreign consumers and more foreign workers are developing plans to counter President Donald Trump’s popular call for a merit-based immigration reform.
The emerging strategy is to pair offers of minor concessions to Americans and Trump with demands for giveaways to business, including a bigger supply of low-wage workers and welfare-funded consumers. The immigration “pairing” strategy is being pushed by the industry-backed Business Policy Council, in cooperation with GOP Sen. Thom Tillis.
The strategy collides with Trump’s emphasis on raising Americans’ wages via “merit-based immigration,” which is also backed by a new productivity-boosting immigration drafted by two GOP Senators, David Perdue and Tom Cotton. “Real and positive immigration reform is possible, as long as we focus on the following goals: to improve jobs and wages for Americans, to strengthen our nation’s security, and to restore respect for our laws,” Trump told Congress February 28.
The business push for “pairing” creates a risk for the many Americans worried about cheap-labor migration, said Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies. President Trump “has the potential to be taken to the cleaners by [Sen.] Chuck Schumer because [immigraton] is something he doesn’t know anything about… hopefully [Steve] Bannon and [Stephen] Miller will prevent this from happening.”
Tillis and lobbyists at the BPC described their emerging “pairing” strategy at a recent press event.
“We have to have border security,” Tillis said in a conversation with Haley Barbour, the co-chair of the BPC’s immigration advocacy task force, who also runs a lobbying firm, the BGR Group. Tillis continued:
To me, it is absolutely essential [border security] be one of the first measures that we pass. Now the question is what can we pair with it that will start creating some sort of consensus going … around a series of other things that we can talk about, but we are not going to put in the [first] bill because if it gets too convoluted, if it becomes too comprehensive, than it starts falling apart.
In 2013, business groups allied with Democratic leader Sen. Chuck Schumer to push a huge “comprehensive immigration reform” bill that provided amnesty and a huge flow of new migrants and workers. Schumer’s “Gang of Eight” bill was defeated because House Speaker John Boehner stalled business groups until public opposition became undeniable.
“Think about [pairing] DACA [President Barack Obama’s 2012 mini-amnesty for young illegals] with border security…. Think about [pairing more] work visas with E-Verify and other enforcement actions against employers,” Tillis said. E-Verify is a federal website that can help screen out illegal during job interviews. However, business lobbying has persuaded Congress to keep the use of E-Verify system voluntary, not mandatory.
E-Verify is a federal website that helps employers identify illegal aliens seeking jobs. However, business lobbying has persuaded Congress to keep the use of E-Verify system voluntary, not mandatory.
Tillis also dismissed Trump’s election-winning promise of a border wall, by suggesting that Congress deny funds for construction of a wall or fence along stretches of the border in favor of “other capabilities.” Border security, he said, “is one of the first things we need to do… [but] it seems to me we could get to a reasonable compromise on a bill that I think will be less costly and more effective than just the concept of a structure. Walls need to be where wall are, but other capabilities need to be elsewhere.”
Barbour and other BPC officials pushed the “pairing” strategy throughout the press event. “The idea of pairing… makes a lot of sense,” said Michael Chertoff, the former Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush. Chertoff is the co-chair of the BPC’s Immigration Task Force.
Tillis’ office did not respond to Breitbart’s emails. Barbour declined an interview request.
Tillis’s policy goals are shaped by the needs of North Carolina’s agriculture industry, which continues to rely on cheap labor for harvesting crops, instead of developing high-productivity crop harvesting machines.
But he is also indirectly backed by his political neighbor, South Carolina’s Sen. Lindsey Graham, who has repeatedly helped his state’s tourism and golfing resorts bring in wage-cutting foreign workers instead of raising wages to hire Americans. In a March 15 interview with Bloomberg, Graham echoed Barbour’s pairing strategy, saying:
The first one would combine ramped-up enforcement, starting with “the bad dudes,” and the legalization of [DACA] illegal immigrants who came here as minors. Republicans are open to that legalization, he said, and it “would be hard for Democrats to say no to securing the border and helping these 800,000 kids have a better life.”
The second one would legalize adult illegal immigrants working in agriculture and tourism, and at the same time require employers to use the e-verify program to make sure all new hires are legal workers.
Third, Graham would legalize those remaining illegal immigrants who passed a background check and paid a fine. In return he wants to shift legal immigration toward recruiting people with high skills rather than reuniting extended families. “The immigration system of the future would be merit-based,” he says.
In late 2012, Graham played a key role with Schumer in launching the 2013 “Gang of Eight” immigration bill.
The “pairing” deals sketched by Barbour, Tillis and Graham would allow a border wall plus an amnesty and the expanded work-permit program, which would give Democrats the future voters they want and also give business groups the new inflow of taxpayer-supported customers and wage-cutting white-collar workers that they want. That endless inflow of new workers would make it more difficult for white-collar and blue-collar Americans to win higher salaries as the economy expands.
ACTION ALERT - GOP Senators introduce new bill to increase immigration and give amnesty!
Despite the Republican electoral success that emanated from a platform of reducing immigration and protecting American workers, Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) has introduced legislation to allow states to sponsor visas for an additional half million immigrant workers per year. The new W visas of S 1040 are good for three years but can be renewed indefinitely so these are not “temporary” guestworkers.
Even worse, the 500,000 visas do not include the spouses and children of the foreign workers who would also be eligible for work permits. Any unused visa allocations would roll over to any states that wanted to issue them in following years, meaning that the U.S. population would increase by millions in a few years, all at the expense of American workers. The visas could be given to illegal aliens already here, even those who committed identity fraud, so the program is, in fact, an amnesty.
Tell your Senators to reject S 1040, a massive immigration increase and amnesty for lawbreakers.
Sen. Johnson announced his State Sponsored Visa Pilot Program Act at an event hosted by the open-borders CATO Institute, an organization with a track record of disdain for American workers. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has joined as a cosponsor.
Let your Senators know that American needs less immigration, not more. Tell them to oppose this nonsensical legislation.
Ask your Senators to reject S 1040, a massive increase in immigration. Send a fax or an e-mail by entering your information and clicking “submit” below.
S.1040 - A bill to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for a State-sponsored nonimmigrant pilot program, and for other purposes.115th Congress (2017-2018) |
Immigration Opponents Trash GOP Border Security Bill
Immigration hard-liners say a proposed border security bill from Republican lawmakers doesn’t do nearly enough to address systemic flaws in the U.S. immigration system.
The draft legislation from Texas GOP Sen. John Cornyn and Texas GOP Rep. Michael McCaul calls for more detention space and immigration judges on the border to speed up deportations, as well as heavier criminal penalties for illegal aliens who return after being removed.
But advocates of tougher immigration enforcement who’ve seen the draft say it does nothing to address certain problems on the border and in the interior of the country. The bill doesn’t provide for President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, penalize businesses that hire illegal immigrants, or mandate the employment verification system E-Verify,
Without those provisions, the law won’t reduce incentives for illegal immigrants to come to the U.S. in the first place, says Jessica Vaughn, the director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies.
“There’s not a single thing about work-site enforcement or anything at all against employers,” Vaughan told the Washington Post, “It’s tinkering around the margins.”
Cornyn and McCaul’s proposal comes as many of Trump’s executive orders to crack down on illegal immigration and sanctuary cities are held up in federal courts. The bill seeks expand the sources of funding that could be withheld from cities and states that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. It would also provide a legislative remedy to a California judge’s ruling that only Congress, and not the president, can place conditions on federal funds.
Both of the bill’s sponsors have downplayed the need for a barrier along the entire U.S-Mexico border, which is the centerpiece of Trump’s border security strategy and a top item on immigration hawks’ wish list. Cornyn said in April that “there’s parts of our border which it [the wall] makes no sense” and that when Trump talks about a wall, “he’s speaking metaphorically.”
Robert Law, director of government relations for the Federation For American Immigration Reform, says the lack of commitment to the border wall means Congress “keeps missing the mark” on immigration enforcement.
“It’s the same failed attempt every single Congress,” Law told WaPo. “New Congress, and nothing changes in actually securing the border.”
Amnesty Bills Currently Filed Since Jan 2017
H.R. 60: ENLIST Act
Sponsor: Rep. Jeff Denham [R-CA10]
Introduced: Jan 3, 2017
Referred to Committee: Jan 3, 2017
Sponsor: Sen. Lindsey Graham [R-SC]
Introduced: Jan 12, 2017
Referred to Committee: Jan 12, 2017
Sponsor: Rep. Raúl Grijalva [D-AZ3]
Introduced: Mar 7, 2017
Referred to Committee: Mar 7, 2017
H.R. 1468: Recognizing America’s Children Act