REVENGE OF THE CRYBABIES: LIBERALS NOW CALLING NEIL GORSUCH ‘ILLEGITIMATE’

Crying boy in glasses

Over a year after the untimely passing of Justice Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court once again has nine justices, as Neil Gorsuch was given the oath of office by Justice Anthony Kennedy – for whom he clerked after law school – in the White House Rose Garden on Monday.

You can watch the full ceremony here:

But now, in the same spirit as the president’s countless unhinged opponents, who’ve wailed “Not My President” well after the election, the cries that Gorsuch is somehow an illegitimate justice have begun. It began shortly after Gorsuch’s confirmation Friday, but has carried on through his swearing-in this week.


(Author’s note: This particular tweet got trolled in a truly beautiful fashion.)


Self-styled constitutional scholar George Takei also managed to drop this analysis on the eve of the vote:


But what precisely is so illegitimate about Gorsuch’s nomination? For all of the screeching and mewling that the seat was somehow stolen from Obama-nominee Merrick Garland, the screechers and mewlers have yet to point to anything remotely unconstitutional or delegitimizing (aside from some nebulous Russian conspiracies) about the process by which we got from nine to eight and back to nine again on the SCOTUS bench.

So, to clarify, here’s a quick recap, from the beginning …

-------------------------------

In the 1780s, a group of men drafted a national constitution in Philadelphia because the Articles of Confederation were a train wreck. This framework gave the president the power to nominate judges and the Senate the power to confirm them to the Supreme Court.

Democrats lost the Senate majority in 2014.

This means that they no longer had the ability to push their party’s nominee through the hearing process.

(The power to advise and consent isn’t a rubber stamp; this is part of that checks-and-balances thingy that you’re really going to want to brush up on for the next four years, at least.)

Antonin Scalia passes away in his sleep last year.

GOP leadership decides it will not hold a hearing for Scalia’s replacement during Obama’s lame-duck year.

The issue of which president and Congress would be given the duty of filling the seat became one of the biggest issues of the 2016 general election.

And – by the rules of the game – the people chose Donald Trump’s vision over that of Hillary Clinton’s.

President Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch.

A Republican Senate confirmed him by a parliamentary procedure pioneered by Democrats in 2013. (If Gorsuch is illegitimate because of the nuclear option, so are quite a few Obama appointees on the federal circuit.)

Judge Neil Gorsuch was sworn in by his former boss in the White House Rose Garden on a sunny Monday morning.

----------------------------

If you can, with a straight face, claim that any of this process was illegitimate or unconstitutional, congratulations; you stand as a living testament to the absolute failure of American civic education.

Contrary to the bastions of progressivist autocracy that liberals have built up in the courts and federal bureaucracy for decades, Gorsuch’s nomination proves that elections, in fact, still come with consequences.

If you can’t deal with the consequences of said elections, you should stop your party from being a regional voice for coastal elites and figure out where you went wrong in 2016. If you see these consequences as illegitimate, then maybe a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people” just isn’t your kind of thing.

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/04/revenge-of-th...

Image result for LIBERALS NOW CALLING NEIL GORSUCH ILLEGITIMATE

Views: 8

Reply to This

LIGHTER SIDE

Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT!!

BREAKING: White House Makes ANOTHER Move
Supporting Roy Moore … Liberals In PANIC !!

(TeaParty.org) – While the lamestream media has criticized President Donald Trump for his silence on the accusations surrounding Republican candidate Roy Moore, and also claimed that his silence is proof of his disapproval of the senatorial hopeful, insiders in the White House issued a second statement confirming their support.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney on Monday affirmed that the Trump administration’s stance on the issue is that Alabama voters should cast their vote for Judge Moore despite the allegations that he performed sexual misconduct with a 14-year-old in his 30s, the Hill reports.

“I don’t think it’s making any news to think that a Republican administration is going to want someone in the Senate who is going to vote for a Republican agenda and if they elect a Democrat to that office that’s not going to happen,” Mulvaney said during a segment of Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria.”

Previous support for Moore came from the White House when aide Kellyanne Conway told Alabama voters not to vote for the fake “conservative” Democrat Doug Jones, claiming a vote for him “will be a vote against tax cuts” on “Fox & Friends.” She added that the Democrat, despite his self-styled label, is “weak on crime, weak on borders,” all but implying that they should choose Moore instead.

Even the Crooked News Network is waking up and realizing that Trump did not, in fact, fall for their smear campaign against Moore:

“By refusing to intervene ahead of Alabama’s December 12 special election, Trump is rejecting Senate Republican leaders’ view that a Moore victory would bring disastrous consequences for the GOP’s brand and needs to be stopped at all costs.”

Initially when asked, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders issued a statement that said the administration was holding back any judgement or endorsement, and trusted the people of Alabama to decide on the allegations facing Moore. But it’s become clear – and a relief to Trump-supporters in the state – that the president is going to welcome and support one of the only senators who will actually back his agenda.

Marc Short, legislative director, caving in to the pressure of badgering liberal reporters, suggested that Trump wasn’t campaigning for Moore because of doubts surrounding the candidate’s innocence.

“If he did not believe that the women’s accusations were credible he would be down campaigning for Roy Moore. He has not done that,” Short said. Clearly, Short had no idea what he was talking about at the time.

While the president has yet to officially endorse Moore, during a briefing with reporters on Monday, Sanders issued a new statement that resonated with tones of approval for the Alabama Republican, reports CNBC.

“The president wants people in the House and Senate who support his agenda,” Sanders said. Since there are absolutely no other candidates in the race who support the president’s agenda, this is obviously an endorsement for Moore. Trump wants people in his government who are true Republicans, not Democrats or RINOs, no matter what nasty rumors liberal slimeballs spread about them.

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service