RESISTING THE RESISTERS
©2018 Burt Prelutsky
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

As you may have noticed, the most recent target of the leftist nincompoops is Rep. Jim Jordan (R, OH) who has been one of the people in Congress actively working to nail the Deep Staters in the FBI and the Justice Department.

In an attempt to destroy Jordan’s career, they have come up with a bunch of ex-college wrestlers who claim that Jordan, who had been an assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State, was aware of the fact that the team doctor enjoyed groping the young jocks but did nothing about it.

Jordan insists he was unaware of what the creep was up to and would have done something if only someone had called the offenses to his attention.

Although the timing of the anti-Jordan campaign is as suspicious as the one that targeted Roy Moore decades after his alleged misbehavior, the most shocking revelation is that a bunch of college wrestlers were such wimps that they let a pervert grope them and didn’t put him in the hospital.

⦿  Commentary magazine, which purports to be the fount of Jewish intellectualism in America, continues to embarrass 
itself and annoy me.

In a cover article titled “The New Jew Hatred: Left and Right,” James Kirchick took the latest gratuitous swipe at the President, writing: “I do not believe Donald Trump is himself an anti-Semite, if only because anti-Semitism is mainly a preoccupation -- as distinct from a prejudice -- and Trump is too narcissistic to indulge any preoccupation other than himself. And there is no evidence to suggest that he subscribes to the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories favored by his alt-right supporters. But his casual resort to populism, nativism, and conspiracy theory creates a narrative environment highly favorable to anti-Semites.”

If I read this pretentious verbiage correctly, Trump is not necessarily a Jew-hater, even though his supporters obviously are. But if he’s not actively anti-Semitic, it’s only because he’s so infatuated with himself, he can’t spare the time.

The writers and editors of Commentary are beginning to remind me that in the early years of Hitler’s reign, a great many German Jews secretly agreed with Hitler, assuming his distaste for Jews was limited to those grubby shtetl-dwellers in Poland and Russia. Der Fuhrer certainly couldn’t be referring to themselves -- not with their highly-developed appreciation of fine wine, fine art, fine food and Wagnerian operas.

It’s not all that dissimilar from the way that lighter-skinned blacks look down on their darker-hued brethren or that the French look down on, well, everyone.

⦿  One of my constant readers let me know that it bothered him when I wrote “commonsense” as one word. He felt I had fallen prey to the left-wing media who apparently also write it as one word, particularly when they refer to “commonsense gun laws.”

I would hate to think that I am being played like a yoyo by those on the Left, who may know how to spell the word, but clearly possess none of it themselves.

I replied: “I’m glad you finally had a chance to get that off your chest. The chances are that I will continue to write it as one word because I believe that is the way it should be written. In the old days, when the New York Yankees seemed to appear in every World Series, people used to make one word of ‘damn Yankees,’ and rightly so because that is the way it was always said.

“I recall that in the 1950s, John Steinbeck wrote an article in which he bemoaned our surrendering a perfectly fine word, ‘comrade,’ to the Communists. In that same spirit, I refuse to surrender ‘commonsense’ to the Left. They will have to pull it if they can from my cold dead hands.”

In response, my correspondent wrote: “I love you anyway!”

I concluded with: “That’s the spirit. It’s not a question of your losing and my winning…..although that is, of course, how I choose to see it.”

⦿  A reader, knowing of my fondness for Mark Twain, confessed that when he read “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” it made him uncomfortable to have the slave, Jim, referred to as a nigger.

He understood that 150 years ago, that was common usage in much of America, along with darkie, spade, spook and coon, but it bothered him. 

Over time, those ugly words morphed into Negroes, then colored, then black and, ultimately, African American, at just about the same time that so many inner-city African Americans unfortunately began behaving like niggers.
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

Views: 38

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Article 3 of the original language and responsibility of the European Alliance reads as follows: "In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack."

"Self help" is the key point that President Trump had made to the members of NATO, and especially to Angela Merkel, w/ his kick-ass speech. It was decades overdue.

Imo, Merkel's sweetheart deal is worthy of the Clintons, Barack Obama and George Soros. Meanwhile, as frau Merkel enriches herself w/ this Russian deal, Germany's air force is dilapidated. Only FOUR of its 128 (or less than 4%) of its fighter jets are combat ready today. (See: https://www.dw.com/en/only-4-of-germanys-128-eurofighter-jets-comba... )

???!!!

LESS THAN 4%?!  I'd say that is a huge breach of the NATO Treaty...and OUR National Security...in itself!

So...grand slam homerun for Trump!  Again, it was a long time coming!

And now the dem/media joins Merkel eating from a spread  made up of sour grapes; sauer kraut and lemons along w/ their caviar. Enjoy!

Luis

 President Trump, needs to completely withdraw from the EU and completely dump NATO removing the UN from controlling our Armed Forces, the EU and the UN is a Economic Leach, they are deceivers, blasphemers in the face of Christ and God. 

 They have no respect to the sovereignty and rights of America's Foundation.

A couple of points, Tif. 

1. We are not a part of the European Union.  That's what the "global warming" scam (i.e. The Copenhagen Treaty; The Paris Accord; etc) is/was all about. 

2. Yes, such bullshit treaties would put us directly under the thumb of the UN as the USA would intially be surrending our very sovereignty to a world governance. Btw, BRAVO! Ambssaador Nikki Haley!

3. As for NATO, as long as any of our Allies also has troops fighting Islamic terrorists in Afghanstan and Syria, etc, we can't "completely withdraw" from NATO.

But, we'd then be able to consider it if or when we redeploy ours from those hotspots.  And, yes, it's long over due that we leave Afghanistan NOW!  As for Syria: We demand that Iran has to completely leave FIRST; and then we would. But only as long as Iran stays OUT!   jmho

ps:  This would be a great opportunity for President Trump out point out that what the USA wants from NATO (Pay your EQUAL share!) is exactly what We want from ALL nations we practice trade with.  EQUAL TARIFFS!  Period!

Yes this was noted, and I have a blog up over this issue, but Trump want America's Sovereignty independent from the British,German,Jewish Nuts.

Trump Told Merkel “You Owe Me One Trillion Dollars” To Her Face: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/trump-told-merkel-you-owe-...

Good For You Tif, You Go Girl, tell it like it is.

LMAO...

luis

Good respond you should also sent it Burt

BREAKING NEWS

PRESIDENT TRUMP GIVES KGB PUTIN A BIG F-YOU!

The potus says NO on sending anyone into the bear's mouth in exchange for Mueller going to Russia to question those Russians under indictment. 

Good for you, Mr President!  Putin has murdered enough people!

 Nope President Trump did not and you are still a:

                             luis✩USA Is A Ding Bat !!!

tif

Trump did say no to interview USA offices. You need to look; that up. luis  in not a dingbat

Me look it up, right, sure thing...:)

Trump Has Invited Putin To Washington Later This Year

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/trump-has-invited-putin-to...

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service