Republicans kick National Review magazine out of February debate

An American conservative magazine found itself disinvited from co-sponsoring a presidential primary debate Thursday night after it published an entire issue devoted to tearing down Republican front-runner Donald Trump.

Speaking to DailyMail.com during a press conference in Las Vegas, Trump dismissed the 60-year-old publication, National Review, as washed-up and irrelevant.

'Its circulation is way down. Not very many people read it anymore,' he said at the Venetian Hotel and Casino before making an appearance on stage at the Outdoor Sportsman Awards, where he accepted the endorsement of 'Duck Dynasty' star Willie Robertson.

'I mean, people don't even think about the National Review,' Trump said. 'So I guess they want to get a little publicity. But you know, it's a dying paper. It's pretty much – I've gotta tell you David, it's pretty much of a dead paper.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3411404/Republicans-kick-co... 

Views: 796

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Glad to see the RNC standing up for a conservative, for a change!

WOW!

Who's idea was it and why after the RNC has been trashing Trump themselves, did they feel it necessary to dis-invite a conservative magazine as sponsor?  I smell a rat.

I wonder which candidate pissed and moaned about their sponsoring the event. Instead of crying about it, why didn't he bring out the normal liberal threat,  "Sue them".

The only honorable (no with RNC honorable wrong word) politically acceptable action they could take a debate is supposedly moderated by neutral persons (you know like CNN MSNBC etc.) 

The thinking at National Review has become very confused.

They claim that Trump will destroy the "values" and "principles" of the Republican Party!  Oh really.  It appears quite clear, the RINO/Establishment "Republicans" (Democrat Lites), such as Mitch McConnell and his entire Senate "Leadership" team, what a joke that is) - and Speaker Paul Ryan and his equally inept "Leadership" team, following in the footsteps of DUFUS Speaker Boehner, are all DEMOCRAT LITES, have already DESTROYED what was once the party of smaller government and reduced spending.  They long ago PROVED they represent half of the notion the "Loyal Opposition" - they being so very loyal to KEEPING THEIR JOBS and LOYAL to Obama and Democrats, giving their way, on anything they want, ALWAYS! 

Don, I have to ask what "values" and what "principles" are these people talking about??? I have not seen any "values" or "principles" for a long time. I have seen a Party who deserted their Flock, and bowed down and kissed Obama's ring. The people did not elect them to become Democrats in Drag.

If I were the Donald..., I would hire a COMPANY, or more of ARMED men, TO GUARD MY BACK, since the RNC is showing some backbone. I suspect the FIX is in.

For the last few days I've been pointing out that Trump wasn't a conservative and seriously didn't know if he even knew he was running in the Republican Party.  Now, we see that maybe even the Republican Party doesn't even know who represents the Party.  Ultimately, Cruz is right, the Republican Progressives know they have their puppet in Trump and will now start kissing his ass. Trump has everything a man could want but having the power of our Presidency would only solidify it.  When was the last real power hungry people says what Trump says, Obama and Hitler, which of these two would you think Trump closely resembles. 

Neither.

Jo, you and I have been on the same side as long as we have responded on these sites.  I really do think you are a good conservative or at least an old time Republican.  Having said that, would you please define the principles that you base you belief.  I hope that you know I'm going to counter everything with what we all know about Trump.  I would first like to take away one of those things that our candidates says what we want to hear.

Hi Ray, I think the majority of my belief, would be based on the fact that so many, many Politicians can be bought, and this man has all the money he needs. So maybe he really is sincere in his hope to make this Country Great Again. I become more sickened daily with "Politicians".

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

ALERT ALERT

Obama Lies Again: – Ignores That The Year After Signing The Stimulus More Than (4) Million Jobs Were Lost

Former President Obama, the only President in US history who had his FBI and other Intel agencies spy on the opposition party candidate, claims that he created the great economy that Americans are enjoying today. The only thing Obama created was debt and massive job losses with his horrible economic recovery.

Yesterday the former President tweeted an effort to take credit for President Trump’s successful economy:

Joe Hoft@joehoft

Of course another @BarackObama lie. He can’t open his mouth without lying. 11 years ago the US lost (4.3) million jobs over the next 12 months. Horrible liar. https://twitter.com/barackobama/status/1229432034650722304 

Barack Obama  @BarackObama

Eleven years ago today, near the bottom of the worst recession in generations, I signed the Recovery Act, paving the way for more than a decade of economic growth and the longest streak of job creation in American history.

President Obama’s policies were a disgrace and a failure. He doubled the national debt in spite of zero interest rates from the Fed. His recovery was the worst in US history.

Also, Obama’s assertion is just plain false. The ‘Stimulus’ was passed in February 2009 right after Obama took over the Presidency. He promised to not pass any bills for at least a week to allow for the bills to be read by the people but lied as soon as he was sworn in. The Stimulus was hundreds and hundreds of pages of government handouts to Democrat districts and it was close to $1 million. This was not what America needed and it led to the Tea Party.

Far-left Wikipedia has this to say about the Stimulus:

Note that in his infinite wisdom, NYT economist Paul Krugman is credited with arguing that “the stimulus was far smaller than the economic crisis warranted”. (He also said the markets would crash and burn if President Trump was elected President.)

The data shows that the 12 months after Obama’s stimulus, the US lost 4.3 million jobs:

In Obama’s first three years he netted a loss of 1.5 million jobs compared to President Trump who has added more than 6.7 million jobs.

When it comes to the economy, the billionaire schools the community organizer every time.

Tucker: Bloomberg is trying to buy the election

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service