Republican's at it again... attempting to sneak through a General Amnesty Bill

Caught: GOP Traitor Sneaks Through Amnesty Bill Letting Anyone into the US If I've said it once, I've said it a million times. The GOP truly thinks they can get away with pushing amnesty through because they don't believe you're paying attention. The major amnesty bills were just the beginning. Conservatives like you raised your voices and forced the Republicans to vote down all of the amnesty bills that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell brought to a vote. The establishment knows they can't win in the light of day, so now they're pushing amnesty in the shadows. As you know, Congress is in the middle of what is known as Appropriations Season. This is when committees and sub-committees decide what will be in the spending bills that come to the floor in September. Yesterday, while debating the Homeland Security spending bill, the Democrats introduced an amendment. They wanted to expand the United States' asylum policies to help more migrants get into the country. Currently, in order to get asylum at the Southern Border, a migrant has to prove that they are being specifically targeted in their home country, usually as a means of political or religious persecution. The Democrat amendment -- written by Rep. David Price (D-NC) -- would expand this to also grant asylum for victims of gang violence and domestic abuse. This would open the border wide up. Instead of only granting asylum to people who are being persecuted for their faiths or political beliefs, the Democrat plan would give amnesty to any migrant who claims their spouse beats them. No proof or evidence required. If this bill passes, every single illegal alien and migrant would have a path to be able to stay in the US! Don't let the establishment get away with this! Tell Congress right now that you will remove anyone who allows this insane amnesty provision to be passed into law! I have tremendous sympathy for real victims of domestic violence. But that doesn't qualify someone for entry into the United States and this plan is so broad, there is no telling how many illegal aliens would try to abuse it. Already, migrants are showing up to the US border with scripts telling them how to game the system. If this new Democrat plan, all someone would have to do is tell Border Patrol that their husband/wife hit them, and they'd be welcomed in. Want to know what is even more pathetic? A Republican committee just approved this resolution! That's right, unless we rise up and stop it, this Democrat amendment will be included in the next spending bill. The House Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee held the vote. Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS) -- shown above -- chairs the subcommittee and allowed the Democrat amendment to receive a vote. But instead of actually counting the yeas and nays, Yoder held a voice vote. This is important. Under a voice vote, the committee members basically shout out their votes. It is then up to the chair to decide which side has more support, based upon nothing but listening to Congressmen yelling "yea" and "nay." In a voice vote, there are no recorded vote tallies. Republicans often use this tactic to pass liberal bills out of committee without forcing GOPers to have to go on the record. It's nothing but cowardice. ( It is more than cowardice... it is deceit for the American Citizens and taxpayers who must pony up to support the invading hordes of illegal migrants entering the US without any screening, medical or criminal... it is treason as we are under attack by the Communist International who sees America as responsible for the poverty in the world.. added not part of the article..) We have no idea which Republicans in the subcommittee voted for this monstrosity, but Yoder felt that the votes were there, so he passed it through. This plan would open up the floodgates to make it even easier for illegal aliens and migrants to enter the US, and the GOP didn't even record the vote.They think they can get away with this. They think they can vote to open up the illegal immigration flood gates without consequence. You MUST prove them wrong! Send your instant message to Congress and threaten to remove any Congressman or Senator who allows this insane asylum amendment to pass! Luckily, this is still in the subcommittee level. The next step will be a hearing in the full House Appropriations Committee, and then onto the House floor for a full vote. We are already hearing that Democrats are going to be pushing a similar amendment in the Senate. If this passes, the country will be lost. There would be no need for illegal immigration. Migrants would just be able to show up at the border and claim spousal abuse or that there was a gang in their neighborhood. That's all they would need to say to be allowed into the US. I warned you that the GOP was working on a behind the scenes amnesty surrender. This is it. It is not to late to stop this, but we need to act right now! Kill this amnesty plan before it is too late! Tell Congress right now that you will remove anyone who allows this insane amnesty provision to be passed into law! It's time to fight,

BY: Joe Otto

Conservative Daily

All of the above extracted from Conservative Daily @ https://conservative-daily.com/ 

FOR ADDITIONAL SOURCE SEE: https://www.numbersusa.com/blog/reps-frelinghuysen-yoder-undermine-...

Views: 116

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

-"There is absolutely no way for US authorities to verify if an asylum seeker was actually the victim of gang or domestic violence.

What this law does is open the US and US borders to anyone who claims to be a victim of gang-domestic violence.

There are over 500 million people today living in Latin America.

Many of these countries are violent and domestic violence is rampant."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/latin-america-population-331x600.jpg

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/gop-lawmakers-led-by-rep-k...

Newt Gingrich Tells Tucker Why Republicans Refuse To Stop Democrats On Immigration — ‘They Lose Their Nerve’

Newt Gingrich on Thursday criticized Republican politicians who “lose their nerve” when it comes to taking a strong stand on immigration.

Speaking to Fox News host Tucker Carlson directly after an opening segment during which the Fox News host brought up Democratic efforts to “pack the electorate” by filling it with Democratic-leaning immigrants, Gingrich noted that Democrats would have a “harder time winning an election with law-abiding Americans.”

“The more people they can bring in who don’t know American history and don’t understand the Constitution and are not part of our traditional values, the better off their chances are,” said the former House speaker. “I think that’s why every single Democratic senator co-sponsored Senator Feinstein’s open border bill which would literally have opened the border to virtually everybody in the world to come to America.”

After mentioning how House Republicans are even now “trying to undo the attorney general’s efforts to tighten the border,” Tucker asked: “Why don’t Republicans on the hill understand the threat that these policies pose to the country and to them?” (RELATED: Tucker Says Dems Support Open Borders For ‘Reliable New V...

“I frankly don’t get it,” Gingrich responded, noting that the majority of Americans are actually with the GOP on many facets of the issue. “Yet Republicans often behave as though they represent a minority interest when in fact even most people who are here as immigrants would like to see law abiding country that is physically safe.”

“The Republican Party won’t exist as a national party at this rate fairly soon,” said Carlson. “A lot of members I know on the hill can do math pretty well but they don’t understand that calculation.”

“Well, I think somehow they lose their nerve,” said Gingrich, citing the “constant” drum beat of the media as a primary factor.

The former House speaker then gave Tucker’s viewers a history lesson on former President Ronald Reagan’s 1986 amnesty bill.

“I can tell you I even voted in 1986 for the Simpson-Mazzoli Act which did have amnesty which promised us control of the border,” said Gingrich. “Reagan signed it reluctantly and wrote in his memoir, his diary, that the only reason he did was to get control of the border. The Congress broke its word. We had ten times as many people come in under amnesty as we were told, 3 million instead of 300,000, and then President Reagan did not get the things he was promised, which were a work permit system and control of the border. Ever since I have been very skeptical.”

“There’s a large part of the national elite that for some reasons loves immigration of any kind and dislikes controlling the border under any circumstance, and routinely smears people,” he added.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/26/newt-gingrich-tucker-republicans-...

Full Committee Members

Republicans

  • Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, New Jersey, Chairman
  • Harold Rogers, Kentucky
  • Robert B. Aderholt, Alabama
  • Kay Granger, Texas
  • Michael K. Simpson, Idaho
  • John Abney Culberson, Texas
  • John R. Carter, Texas
  • Ken Calvert, California
  • Tom Cole, Oklahoma
  • Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
  • Tom Graves, Georgia
  • Kevin Yoder, Kansas
  • Steve Womack, Arkansas
  • Jeff Fortenberry, Nebraska
  • Thomas J. Rooney, Florida
  • Charles J. Fleischmann, Tennessee
  • Jaime Herrera Beutler, Washington
  • David P. Joyce, Ohio
  • David G. Valadao, California
  • Andy Harris, MD, Maryland
  • Martha Roby, Alabama
  • Mark E. Amodei, Nevada
  • Chris Stewart, Utah
  • David Young, Iowa
  • Evan H. Jenkins, West Virginia
  • Steven Palazzo, Mississippi
  • Dan Newhouse, Washington
  • John R. Moolenaar, Michigan
  • Scott Taylor, Virginia
  • John Rutherford, Florida

Democrats

  • Nita M. Lowey, New York
  • Marcy Kaptur, Ohio
  • Peter J. Visclosky, Indiana
  • José E. Serrano, New York
  • Rosa L. DeLauro, Connecticut
  • David E. Price, North Carolina
  • Lucille Roybal-Allard, California
  • Sanford D. Bishop, Jr., Georgia
  • Barbara Lee, California
  • Betty McCollum, Minnesota
  • Tim Ryan, Ohio
  • C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida
  • Henry Cuellar, Texas
  • Chellie Pingree, Maine
  • Mike Quigley, Illinois
  • Derek Kilmer, Washington
  • Matt Cartwright, Pennsylvania
  • Grace Meng, New York
  • Mark Pocan, Wisconsin
  • Katherine M. Clark, Massachusetts
  • Pete Aguilar, California

https://appropriations.house.gov/about/members/

I disagree with Newt... I believe that these Republicans are in fact SOCIALIST or Fascist/feudal lords, running as members of the GOP... However, they in fact, agree with open borders and universal citizenship ...  keeping with the Communist Manifesto and its promise of universal government and a new world order where a few are privileged and the rest of us live as peons.  Those who are not outright socialist are hardcore fascist looking to reimpose a peon/feudal system; whereby, the elite become the new age aristocracy, living under a separate set of laws, while the bulk of America is relegated to a peon status.

The GOP is seriously infected with defectors from the Democrat Party, Constitutional Law, and conservative values... they feign conservative values to be elected and then follow socialist or fascist/feudal doctrines.  Trump needs to call them out regularly by NAME and location... So, the people can rally to support challengers in the PRIMARIES... we must eliminate these traitors in the primaries.

It want do them any good to pass legislation, if they do not open up the door to amend the current Immigration Laws. They will not do that, it would bring in all the 50 states.

Hank...

We don't need to amend our current immigration law... as amended during the Reagan Administration... we need to enforce the current laws before we begin adding new laws.  

If anything,  we need to have DHS strengthen the regulations affecting the penalties assigned for violating various parts of the current Immigration and Naturalization Act... By using their regulatory authority, they can mandate jail time for various US Citizens who aid and abet illegal alien trafficking. 

 Ronald we know, but what state did this take place in and how many people voted?

Tif...

This Vote took place inThe House Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee... This Committee, led by Republicans, held the vote which advanced the Amendment.  No  State Legislature was involved.  Please pay attention...  read the article posted.

In addition, Kat provided a list of the members on the Committee above...  See: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/xn/detail/4301673:Comment:4667020

You pay attention Mr. Nelson, which state of the United States did the vote take place at.

 Does California come close???

 

Never mind Mr. Nelson, I will bring the blog on line.

Come on Mr. Nelson, what state did this vote take place in? Tif asked you something.

 Its a good blog Ronald, but its clustered, nothing is broke down, so I looked it up, it started in Oct 2017, its called, "Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act " : https://www.google.com/search?q=Fairness+for+High-Skilled+Immigrant...

 Now, is it not true Trump has the right to approve this, or veto it? Then of course, is it Constitutional Correct?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service