Rep. Steve King said Tuesday that granting amnesty to immigrants in this country illegally is more than the equivalent of giving a pass to a bank robber, it’s like letting them keep the money, too.

“To grant amnesty is to pardon immigration lawbreakers and reward them with the objective of their crime,” King said at a Washington panel on amnesty hosted by the conservative group Judicial Watch on Tuesday. “Whatever their objective is, the advocates of amnesty are seeking to grant them their objective.”

The Iowa Republican said whether the immigrants came to the U.S. to work, to send money back home or to join family, allowing them to stay here is letting them profit off their illegal behavior.

read more:

Views: 507

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Scottsdale, Arizona sent me a letter informing me that his department apprehended over 35,000 illegal immigrants this year.  The U. S. Justice System run by Eric Holder has tried to put him out of business for enforcing the existing Immigration laws already in force.  The Mexican illegals even tried to get a recall on Joe Arpaio.  The Mexican illegals failed.

Now the Feds are after him claiming that his sheriffs are racists.  With the ACLU law suit, the judge agreed and Sheriff Joe is appealing.

The Arizona Governor with and Arizona House of Representatives have been allowed to build their own border fence with the states own money and with the help of prison inmates.

The Lt. Governor of Texas has also told the Feds that he will provide his own border and fence patrol.




Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Al Goodwyn


Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service