Reaping What you Sow: Unions Reap Their Own Bitter Harvest in Michigan

11 Dec 2012, 3:17 PM PDT

Perhaps more surprising than the measure's passage, though, is it's genesis. The new law is the direct result of an epic strategic miscalculation by the state's union bosses.

Spooked by the success Gov. Walker was having in reforming the state's public sector unions, unions in MI hatched a plan to put an initiative on the November ballot. The initiative would enshrine public sector collective bargaining rights in the state constitution. GOP Gov. Rick Synder, who largely has governed as a moderate, warned the unions not to push the initiative. He even threatened to bring up the right to work (RTW) issue if they went forward with the ballot measure. 

The unions obviously rejected this advice. A knowledgeable source close to the events in Michigan told Breitbart News that almost immediately after the unions launched their initiative a small group of activists, legislators and businesses began meeting to plot a legislative strategy for the RTW bill.  

58% of Michiganders voted against the union initiative. The unions had spent tens of millions of their members' dues promoting the initiative. Yet, the same electorate that strongly backed Barack Obama's reelection and increased Democrats' standing at all levels of government overwhelmingly opposed the unions.

Views: 716

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hay, unions  go jump in lake Michigan

Let there be no doubt, unions have outlived their usefulness.  If there is any quesion of the destructive nature of unions, visit Detroit.

The unions served a good purpose, until they got too much power.  Business after business has been forced to seek lower cost environments, more control over the operation of their business, and even their survivability, whether in the U.S. or not. 

Now, the union leaders, communists all, use the unions to fund and enhance their power and control.  They nearly own the federal government.

Fortunately, the legislature and Governor of Michigan has said, enough is enough.  Even the thugs that are protesting, today, will be the benefactors! 

The birthplace of unions today, freedom for the rest of the country, tomorrow.  Maybe not New York and Illinois, but who cares?



Guess the unions are just smarter then everyone else, to smart to listen. How's that working for you AFL/CIO, UAW etc.

The unions, especially the public sector unions, have become a political entity in and of themselves. Their primary job in their formation was to protect and serve their members, not to be a union dues bank account for liberal progressives who in the end are causing the loss of most of the American jobs now going overseas to less productive companies who it seems can hire three and even four or more workers at cheaper costs.

Go to an American auto factory and look at how many foreign cars are in their parking lots then come back and tell me how caring the workers at that company think the product they produce is better. And if their answer is it is cheaper, then tell them the worker overseas who produced that car worked for cheaper and even in some respects slave wages.  

At some time the truth must be clear. The American worker can out produce any other countries worker but with our technology outracing the need for in house workers it is clear that we cannot increase our wage scale and perks to a point where our far superior production is undercut by a massive foreign workforce that is paid in pennies and without the perks and high pension costs our companies have to provide.

the unions are wallowing in their own greed and corruption, and the american public have become much wiser in the union games. they hide behind protecting the workers, but in reality they have become a political force that takes union dues, and recycles it into the democrat party, and the worker has no sayso, on where the dues go. all of this money supports obama, and the washington lobbyist. all of the union honchos are very wealthy...and it has turned into one of the most biggest money laundering scams in the united states.

The pro-union members/workers deserve what they get also. The RTW workers are many times better workers, do a better job and dependable. Most pro-union workers I know are haughty in their work. Majority take advantage of the employers: call in when needed most (non sickness), make unreasonable demands and display superiority toward management and other employees. Nurses who join unions are only interested in MONEY and making trouble, they also have an arrogant attitude. These Nuerses can not be trusted!

THEY GOT WHAT THEY PLANTED,,,? "REAP WHAT YOU SOW"...? That means that these intellectual union bosses harvested what they got

The unions thought that they were "untouchable" with their "boy" in the WH!  Sorry dudes, your "boy" has to start losing sometime; it is simply inevitable!  For me, the sooner the better!

This is the first time I've laughed out loud in a long time. This is absolutely great. Not even Obummer could turn this decision around! LOL

I didn't know that they actually harvest anything other than Union thugs and corruptocrats in Michigan. Because they sure don't harvest anything of a food substance do they? My heart goes out to my fellow comrades and citizens in that area as well as a Governor with sanity!

I've been seeing the erroneous use of this phrase, "reap what you sew," a bit too often lately. I hope people will use the correct phrase, "reap what you sow," in order to maintain a semblance of erudition.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service