"Racist" -- A Word Invented by USSR's Leon Trotsky

The word "racist" has for a long time been the single most effective fear-word in the leftist and neoconservative arsenal. For decades, they have successfully used it in the political arena to slander traditionalists, shut down debate, and leave opponents running for cover. In the social arena, they have caused even more damage by using it to brainwash impressionable children and young college students, and to teach people to hate their nation, their cultural traditions, and worst of all, themselves.

What surprisingly remains almost totally undiscussed, even on the hard core traditionalist Right, is the word's origin. Did it come from a liberal sociologist? A 60's Marxist college professor? Perhaps a politician in the Democratic Party? No. It turns out that the word was invented by none other than one of the principal architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare, the founder and first leader of the infamous Red Army, Leon Trotsky.

Take a look at this document if you would, dear reader.

Славянофильство, мессианизм отсталости, строило свою философию на том, что русский народ и его церковь насквозь демократичны, а официальная Россия -- это немецкая бюрократия, насажденная Петром. Маркс заметил по этому поводу: "Ведь точно так же и тевтонские ослы сваливают деспотизм Фридриха II и т. д. на французов, как будто отсталые рабы не нуждаются всегда в цивилизованных рабах, чтобы пройти нужную выучку". Это краткое замечание исчерпывает до дна не только старую философию славянофилов, но и новейшие откровения "расистов".

This is Leon Trotsky's 1930 work, "The History of the Russian Revolution", from which shown above is a passage. The last word in that passage is "расистов", whose Latin transliteration is "racistov", i.e., "racists". This work here is the first time in history one will ever find that word.

My more doubtful readers may check the internet, the microfiche and microfilm at the local library, as well as the numerous books arrayed along the shelves there, but they shall never find an earlier usage of the word "racist" than Trotsky's coinage of the word here.

read more:


Views: 1151

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Amazing... didn't know that. Trotsky's racist mongering and his Democratic followers.

Excellent work. I never gave any thought to the origin of the word, but it makes perfect sense that a Communist would be the deliveryman for this kind of evil. They have given us the whole script that the useful idiot Authoritarians (not Liberals) follow. The so-called right wingers follow Mussolini's fascist doctrine, while the so-called Libs follow Lenin/Stalin/Trotsky doctrine; neo-Cons are the bastards in between. I follow George Washington/Thomas Jefferson/James Madison - Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Constitution.


That word doesn't scare me , doesn't stop me from voicing my political opinion, doesn't intimidate me , doesn't make me hate my country or anyone in it and I don't hate myself because I am comfortable in my own skin.  People who yell racist are the ones who really are RACIST. If you need to yell racist everytime you hear something you don't like or agree with, THEN YOU HAVE A PROBLEM AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM !

You can call me racist all day long, does not bother me because I know I'm not.  I don't cower when that word is so freely flung around.  I fight back. That word will never make me back down or cower, sorry.

I do not doubt this at all. I am very glad that intelligent people are finally reassessing the malevolent and devious qualities of this manipulative and destructive. word. As I have understood it, the word was first introduced to the English language by Magnus Hirschfield a radical homosexual activist and Marxist. In 1936 his book of "Racism" was printed in English shortly after his death. It is clear that the implementation of the word was designed to paralyze and cripple those who were weak minded enough to allow sentiments of guilt to over ride their ability to think rationally, or even morally. The power of Marxism is in it's ability to destroy all of the natural institutions of mankind. This includes the institutions of the Nation State, the National Ethnic Family, and the natural family unit of Father, Mother, children, and extended genetic family.  Global dictatorship is dependent upon the destruction of these natural pillars of human civilization.

Out of the mouth of a psychotic suppressive A-hole.  Still used today by the like-minded...Semper Fi Nam 66-67

Cultural shock will not remove the term.  Cultural clashes will continue until evil is defeated.  The wrecking balls of all nations over the land of God's chosen people is fruitless and will not stand. 

They can call me whatever they want. I know who I am and do not let idiots define me.

Isn't it simply amazing how the Dems are constantly attempting to disguise their true meaning by vague interpretations of words that seem to fit their ideology.  Bless Webster Dictionary and synonyms for the Dems vocabulary.  If you can not dazzle with brilliance, baffle with BS because as they so eloquently referred to us as the intellectually deficient.  (Idiots).  Thank God I have the vast majority of citizens to relate to. 

Good information, Racist...

America REALLY needs to save the Ukrainhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=c9FS1b........

The term racist means nothing anymore. Liberals & Minorities shout it everytime they can't have or win an intelligent argument.  They have OVERused the term so much that "Who Cares".

The better way to deal with this is to call them a racist FIRST.  Gets them all confused and pissed.




Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service