Question of the Day: Why Can I not find the CIA's 'Russia rigged the election' report anywhere?

Question of the Day

Image result for RUssia rigged the election meme

I have looked all over the internet and all I find is this alleged information came from ' a senior U.S. official' and that this is a 'secret assessment'. I find no report, just the nefarious 'senior official'.  This information was shared with "key senators in a closed-door briefing". WHAT?  Can't they just say shared with Democrats? 

Why Can I not find the CIA's 'Russia rigged the election' report anywhere? Is this just more Democrat propaganda via the Mainstream Media?

Views: 432

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This almost non-event should demonstrate to everyone that the media has no plans to change their ways. Somebody should relay this fact to Donald Trump. The lock-step media has been given their leftist marching orders and must persist until some devious objective is met. A lot of money was spent betting on Hillary and these mega rich criminals from all over the world want their desires met.
So, once again with the assistance of the corrupt [DEM] media’s megaphone – we're now witnessing that there’s no deviation from the original desired course. The lock-step media will continue to support the left wing narrative, because they ARE the left. No matter what the issue is (true or not) their mission is to destroy the opposition. You might say, the election is over. In their minds, they don’t lose elections. They consider the unfavorable results – as only a minor set back. Like all competitors in life, they do not look inward for changes in their strategy to win the next time. Instead, they seek for ways to change the undesired results. They are pulling out all the stops to undermine and de-legitimize the Trump administration. This will be the new narrative derived from this circus. Plant the doubts every day, until it becomes truth in the minds of their kooks. The pressure is on and they are up for the task. They are brazen and they are driven.
In a real world, Hillary, Obama and the rest of the un-indicted malcontents would and certainly should be in prison. Many of us positively realize what’s going on, but will more of the population begin to realize it too? Possibly, but I find it doubtful.
With Donald Trump being the president-elect, he should demand that these so-called security agencies clarify many of their ambiguous statements. They’re obviously citing their vague opinions and offering many non-applicable facts to many of the DEMs specific public allegations. This does not help any of the current population and of course, these sporadic details are actually not intended to. The DEMs love to create a narrative from pure fiction. They figure that if they say it enough, fantasy becomes reality. ‘Hands Up - Don’t Shoot’ is now the modern classic example. With tidbits of information mixed cleverly with simple national security policies, the corrupt media runs headlines culled from almost totally erroneous reports. Then they attach, claims by anonymous so-called experts who have told them that the Russians have manipulated the polling stations and/or hacked the DNC to sway the election process. Really?
Now that Trump will officially have the bully pulpit, he should use it (via his surrogates) to his advantage and correct the BS, before this thing grows legs. He may even resort to taking a page from their playbook, like reversing the outrageous allegations.
The real issue is not that the DNC was hacked for whatever reasons the DEMs choose to apply to it. No sir. The real issue is what the Democrats got caught with. The Truth about who they ARE. The  hacked emails clearly showed how they double crossed Bernie Sanders, how they plotted against Donald Trump to make him appear like a predator, and how they smeared the very same people they hoped to cull their precious votes.......
...........and that would be their own voter base.

Frankmusic, GREAT post. Thank you for covering this issue precisely.

Thanks PatriotGal!

Frankmusic, I'm quite sure President-elect and his staff are well aware of these facts and have been in contact with various agencies. I'm also sure they're well aware that there's a political minefield, along with other types, out there.

it is always the same with fake evidence just the seriousness of the charge

You can't find it because it is under construction.

Where is Wiki Leaks -- if there is one, Wiki will share with us.

Watch the other hand -- this is a distraction.

In the meantime, why aren't we told about the Clintonistas deal with Russia selling them 25% of the USA uranium?

Where's the fake news on that one?

Paging ministry of truth....

Common sense excellent points.  Especially to watch the other hand.   

why can't you find a CIA report on Russia rigging the election?

..because there isn't one?  Somebody decided Russia was gonna be the convenient assigned boogyman for multiple purposes, however many diversions are needed. The scapegoat for Hillary being soundly rejected, the scapegoat for Wikileaks' damning leaked information, etc...

IMO - if CIA is actually saying Russia did it through Wikileaks, it's only to divert attention away from the fact that the information was provided to Wikileaks by somebody(s) within NSA.

The punishable sin is what the politicians did, which was made public by the 'leaked' information. Not the release of the information - and any effect it might have had on the election.

Notice Obama just said he want to know if Russia did it, he did not wanrt to know who did it, afraid he would have to name the DNC

The entire accusation is a distraction intentionally created by the DEMs for DAMAGE CONTROL.

I agree with you Frank. They were seeing the painting on the wall and they had to come up with something and of coarse Russia is just the right boggy man to blame it on....




Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel


CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.


“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service