Psychiatrist Who Accused Trump Of Instability Is A Fraud With No License To Practice

The psychiatrist who appeared on mainstream media accusing Trump of mental instability is a fraud with no license to practice psychiatry.

Mainstream media reacted with glee last week when a “psychiatrist” went public with claims President Trump is suffering from mentally instability – and worse. However these same media outlets now have egg on their face, because the “psychiatrist” they were so keen to promote as an authority on the president’s health has just been exposed as a total fraud.

That’s right, Dr. Bandy Lee, who also briefed congressional Democrats about the president’s mental health, does not even hold a current license to practice psychiatry!

Trump’s accuser, Dr. Bandy Lee, does not have a current license to practice psychiatry.

 Dr. Bandy Lee managed to connive her way onto CNN and NPR, among many others, last week, openly criticizing the president and attempting to sell her book, “The Dangerous Case Of Donald Trump,” released in October last year.

 These mainstream outlets lapped up everything Dr. Bandy Lee said about the president, without stopping to check her credentials. Now the have a serious amount of egg on their face. Will they apologize for promoting the work of a charlatan who is not even licensed to practice psychiatry?

 It just shows how desperate they are for any kind of dirt on Trump. They will dedicate serious airtime to a charlatan who has no license to practice.

 Even if Dr. Lee was a real psychiatrist, she would be breaking the profession’s most serious rule.

 Diagnosing someone without meeting them, much less treating them, is a taboo in the medical profession. The American Psychiatric Association’s so-called “Goldwater Rule” prevents psychiatrists from offering a professional opinion on someone they haven’t treated.

 That didn’t stop Dr. Lee from trying to make a quick buck with a book about Trump’s imagined mental health. It also didn’t stop mainstream media from giving her plenty of time to advertise her fraudulent work of fiction.

Views: 78

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Check this out Tif:

Scott Adams: "Scott Adams talks about the Dr. Bandy Lee fake news ...

Scott Adams talks about the Dr. Bandy Lee fake news, North Korea, drones, David Brooks, and delicious coffee · 39:37. 8 hours ago. Scott Adams tells you why presidential approval polls don't mean what they used to mean with. Bring coffee. 01:15. 8 hours ago. Scott Adams tells you why presidential approval polls don't ...

Scott Adams talks about the Dr Bandy Lee fake news, North Korea, drones And David Brooks_ YouTube

Scott Adams Talks About The Dr Bandy Lee Fake News Against Trump

Dr. Bandy Lee, briefed congressional Democrats about the president’s mental health? Wow! That's exactly what we all need. Right? Providing bogus Presidential health information, to America's largest National Hate group (the Socialist DEMs) .......from a completely delusional hack-quack.


Dr. Bandy Lee, I don't think Tif knows what she stumbled onto. She is from North Korea, they are worried Trump may do them.

 There is a very good chance that the DNC created the whole News Flash, and this is it, Dr. Bandy Lee no one knows who the hell she is?

Her whole BIO maybe fake, or they picked her out offered money a book and, its just damn weird man !

  I have to send this to the network......

Show Highlights: Duty to Warn | Mental Fitness | Dr. Bandy Lee | Donald Trump- YouTube

Published on Jan 10, 2018
Levin even stated WHO THE HELL IS Dr. Bandy Lee ?

I was doing a follow up at Twitter, and damn-it-man, Twitter Locked On and Knocked me off line, but I did save some info before they closed up the page. If the links work they work, I think Twitter may shut down the page?

Does this doctor seem mentally fit for the job? by Scott Adams

‏ @MyPlace4U
4h4 hours ago
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays

*Her license expired in 2015. She is not currently licensed.

Scott Adams on Twitter: "Does this doctor seem mentally fit for the job ...

4 days ago - DemExit added,. Bandy Lee @BandyXLee. Replying to @Jimbos2002. Thank you for the compliment, but I am not so young! After 22 years in psychiatry, and 20 years dealing with violent offenders, things get rather routine. Working in jails and prisons, I have seen over a thousand patients like Mr. Trump.

 She Is A College Student, a kid, this is getting better all the time.

Hey Frank, check this out-

What happened, what all did ya find out? You sent a file, now everyone is up and hoping mad.

 OH, ok now I see, Thank you, but this is getting attention now.


 Her true name is Xéna Lee or Xéna Bandy Lee,most of her past is locked up, her BIO has not been confirmed.


Records show psych prof who 'diagnosed' Trump lacks license

Anthony Gockowski
Contributing Editor/Investigative Reporter
on Jan 10, 2018 at 4:29 PM EDT

The Yale University psychology professor who has repeatedly diagnosed President Trump with a "mental impairment" appears to lack a valid license in the State of Connecticut.
State records indicate that Bandy Lee's “physician/surgeon” license expired in 2015, and her application for reinstatement has been “pending” ever since.
Lee told Campus Reform that "I need only one license," but did not specify which license she was referring to, or whether she possesses such a license.

According to the State of Connecticut, Bandy Lee does not have a valid license to practice psychiatry.

Yale University psychology professor Bandy Lee has deleted her Twitter account amid mounting allegations that she is not licensed in her home state of Connecticut.

Accusations have been circulating on Twitter that the prominent Yale professor, known for her public diagnosis of President Donald Trump as having a “mental impairment” and who recently met with lawmakers on Capitol Hill to discuss the issue, isn’t actually a licensed psychiatrist.

Connecticut, Lee’s “physician/surgeon” license expired in 2015, and her application for reinstatement has been “pending” ever since.

Additionally, her “controlled substance registration for practitioner” license has apparently “lapsed,” expiring in February 2017.

In response to Campus Reform’s inquiry on the matter, Lee simply stated that “I need only one license,” though she has yet to elaborate on precisely which license that is, and, according to the state in which she resides, she allegedly has none.

Without mentioning Lee specifically, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) put out a recent statement in which it condemned the diagnoses of public officials whom psychiatrists have not personally examined, invoking what is commonly referred to as the Goldwater Rule.

“We at the APA call for an end to psychiatrists providing professional opinions in the media about public figures whom they have not examined, whether it be on cable news appearances, books, or in social media,” the statement read, according to The Washington Examiner.

“Arm-chair psychiatry or the use of psychiatry as a political tool is the misuse of psychiatry and is unacceptable and unethical,” the APA concluded.

Lee and a colleague, however, responded to criticisms in a Wednesday POLITICO piece, in which they claim that “it’s perfectly OK to question the president’s mental state,” since they are “psychiatrists.”

Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @AGockowski

Will you help expose liberal bias on America's campuses?

Campus Reform exposes the liberal bias and abuse against conservatives on America’s colleges and universities.

As a Campus Reform reader, you know about the abuse taking place at our nation’s higher education institutions, and you know how important it is to bring these stories to light.

College campuses are no longer bastions of higher learning. Professors indoctrinate students with their agendas. They even silence conservative students with their attempts to suppress free speech.

Campus Reform depends on the financial support of concerned Americans like you to report on leftist indoctrination on college campuses and uncover the blatant misconduct of university administrators, faculty, and students.

Your tax-deductible gift will expose these attacks to millions of Americans.

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

How many American and European Union citizens did you psychiatrist Bandy X. Lee murdered in US on behalf of crazy elites !!????

Question for Chinese communist party and off course psychiatrist Bandy X. Lee....
In 2005, American and European NEONAZI psychiatrists(Putin and Medvedev demanded from me not to talk about it and keep whole thing as confidential) suggested me that "they" want me dead, I cite, "you must leave US or they will kill you"(well, I didn't have much choice in that case have I...a bit tough situation thanks to John McCain and German government when whole world wants you dead at all costs)

Health deteriorated enormously(rapidly) with Chinese government involvement(it was more and more like this often times participated in torture with AmeroGerman NEONAZIS, but whole thing went beyond limits(torturing me became their obsession). Chinese government afterwards stalked me in Norway, Sweden, Canada, Slovenia(in this very town of Novo mesto), Hungary(2017), heavily in Germany(Angela Merkel obsessed with idea to get read of me at all costs had them on every corner - she had even Chinese girl block me road when I drove heavy semi tractor-trailer(double) to Germany)...
In Chicago(2008), there was nothing but Chinese females around me(have invited me on job interview to Milwaukee just to meet variety of Chinese women). It looked as if state of Illinois and Wisconsin have turned itself into China(don't get me wrong, I had beautiful Chinese girlfriend that Chinese government have awarded me with in 2006, but not like this - you can't give neonazis grounds for engagement in violence against targeted individual and even engage in violence against one because he is weaker party - human dignity in a decent human being will never ever allow you so)
From top AmeroGerman NEONAZIS, MOSSAD and well trained Chinese killers(she looks like psychopath by the way) may think it was interesting life, but it was life of less than what rats have....this is related to

No, I do not hate China at all...I like(love) Chinese people despite all this here(John McCain's game is finished here - no more of his NEONAZI lunacy)...this is also not commercial against communism as I firmly believe in communists(I believe that Chinese communist party is a shining example of real freedom in China and the guide/light to humanity...they managed to crack on American NEONAZI "human rights" and secure future of Chinese people through hard work/dedication, and growth of patriotism).

This(Xi Jinping) Chinese individual(now Chinese president) was present in Miami with other Chinese delegation....he interacted frequently with John McCain who anticipated divide and conquer game between Russians and Chinese at all costs...Chinese communist party must not become radicalized and even racist political party - have you Chinese forgotten about WWII !!???? Are you going to lose one now by joining and assisting NEONAZIS in a war against humanity !!???? 

Chinese should have this individual immediately removed from government - specially because of traditionally strong ties with Russia that guarantee both countries existence(am not sure on how much do Chinese want to go back on Buckingham palace's opium or be slaughtered like grass by NEOAZIS = Germans brainwashed Japanese in slaughter - make no mistake about that - German murdered 80 million in WWII, it will be 8 billion next time !!!).

This may help, her ID is some what strange, listed at her home address is this,

Inmyung Lee Age 70s

Lee Bandy age not listed

Grace Lee Age 50s

Bandy Xenobia Lee Age 40s

Yoo Sung Lee Age 70s

Lee, Bandy MD age not listed


Dr. Bandy Lee MD
Psychiatry Neurology
17 Years Experience

We are very happy to present our new special issue on Violence and Health in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) Violence Prevention Alliance (VPA), edited by James Gilligan, Sylvia Kaaya and Bandy X Lee.

This issue highlights recent progress that the violence prevention field has made.  The Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals included a proposal to “promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development.”  This set of articles addresses the urgent need for Global South-North collaboration and helps to fill gaps in research toward realizing these goals.



Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne


FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.


 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service