Exclusive: Jack Cashill revisits eye-popping anomalies concerning Romney ballots

Retired Pittsburgh-area manufacturer Bill Been stumbled into what may prove to be the most significant presidential vote fraud scandal since, at least, 1960.

Although Been did not buy into the myth of the missing millions of Republican voters for Mitt Romney in 2012, he was troubled by the Romney shortfall in at least three Pennsylvania counties: Philadelphia, the suburban Philadelphia county of Delaware, and the Pittsburgh-area county, Allegheny.

In fact, Romney outperformed John McCain’s 2008 numbers in virtually every state, including Pennsylvania, but in these three counties, he received 35,000 fewer votes than McCain had in 2008.

A mathematician by training, Been set out to understand the localized Romney shortfall in Allegheny County. There was an obvious binary nature to the problem: either fewer Republicans voted in 2012 than in 2008 or the official Allegheny County Voter History failed to record all the votes of those who did.

To solve this problem, Been planned to ask those Republicans who voted in the 2008 presidential election but did not seem to have voted in 2012 whether they actually voted or not. More than 24,000 people fell into this category.

To test the thesis, Been ran a preliminary phone survey in the Gibsonia area. Of the 21 people he reached who fit this description, 18 of them (or their spouses) claimed the person in question did, in fact, vote for Romney in 2012.

The phone survey, although unreliable in itself, showed Been that further testing was warranted. To enhance reliability, he would need to walk the test door-to-door and have respondents sign a notarized affidavit swearing their response to be accurate. The affidavit read as follows, “I, __________, who currently resides in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, do affirm that I voted in the General Election held on November 6, 2012.”

Been took the survey to 179 households. 130 of the targeted voters were not at home or no longer at that location. Of those remaining, 38 were willing to answer the question of whether they voted in 2012. Of these, 13 said they had not voted and 25 said they had voted in the 2012 election.

When combined with the phone surveys, 49 voters were identified as having voted, none of whom were listed as having voted in 2012 on the Bureau of Elections CD. Of the 49, 22 were willing to sign an affidavit testifying to the effect that they had voted in 2012. Several expressed disbelief that their votes may not have been counted.

Although Been’s sample is too small to project with any accuracy, it is possible that as many as half of the 24,000 missing voters in Allegheny County actually did vote in 2012.

Is it within reason to question whether election officials simply chose not to record thousands of Republican votes? If the numbers in Philadelphia are any indication, the answer is yes. A week after the 2012 election, for instance, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that in 59 inner-city voting divisions, Mitt Romney received no votes.

“These are the kind of numbers that send Republicans into paroxysms of voter-fraud angst,” reported the Inquirer glibly. Well, yes they do. When Barack Obama outscores Romney by a combined 19,605 to zero votes cast in these 59 districts, the stench of fraud is surely in the air. Fidel Castro never did this well. That said, not a single major media outlet followed up on the Philadelphia story.

They should have. According to Roper, Romney received 6 percent of the black vote nationwide. If those numbers held in Philadelphia, and there is no reason to believe they would not have, nearly 1,200 of these Philadelphia voters would have voted for Romney.

If only 14 people voted in those districts, the odds would have favored Romney’s receiving at least one vote. If 80 people had voted, Romney would have had a better than 99 percent chance of receiving at least one of those votes. With nearly 20,000 voters, the odds of Romney being completely shut out are beyond any reasonable calculation.

This is a story the media should have hopped on. They did not. Instead, they have left the research to enterprising individuals like Bill Been. Knowing nothing, the media smugly question the motives of anyone, presidential candidates especially, who points out the obvious.


Image result for THOUSANDS OF GOP VOTES STOLEN cartoon

Views: 1603

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Democrat Bolsheviks are emulating the Stalin voting plan...It's not the vote that counts...it's who count the votes.

Voter Fraud is epidemic ... it is not reported in Illinois, Indiana, Texas, Virginia, N. Carolina, Pennsylvanian, Florida, California... and several other states... the LA times reports irregularities instead of calling them voter and registration fraud... typical MSM BS...  If Texas it has been demonstrated that the Electronic Voting machines are rigged thru internal programs that change the vote totals and the Secretary of State refuses to do anything about it... 

Our elections are totally rigged... we can not know who is voting or for whom they are voting... the courts are corrupt, the Federal Election Commission is s joke, and both political parties are completely compromised and corrupt.  America has long lost its status as a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC... the People ARE NOT CONSENTING to the GOVERNMENT ... with their votes or their support after the elections..

One only needs to understand that Congress's approval ratings are in the tank... low two digit or single digit numbers, the Administration's approval is no better and the Judicial/DOJ is not far behind.  Revolution is brewing in the living rooms of America as the people become more and more aware of just how blatantly oppressive the government has become... Our government is not of the people, nor is it for the people or by the people... it is by a cabal of Criminals who are fronting as members of our political party. 

Our DOJ, FBI, and Courts  have been revealed to be nothing more than the pawns of a corrupt and criminal Enterprise operating within our Government and political parties... The People will need to act directly to remove them from office... Elections will not work as they are totally lost to the public as a method for removing corruption from government ... voting is no longer a viable way to show ones approval for those serving in the government... the People's franchise on elections has been HIJACKED by Criminal elements in both political parties. The American people no longer have control of their government.

Trump needs to begin to plan and organize for peaceful civil assemblies... too include massive LABOR STRIKES.. all non-essential workers must assemble or remain at home on strike until the government resigns... A Term Limits and Recall Amendment is passed and new elections scheduled.  One Term, 6yrs for ALL public offices ... elected and appointed... with 1/3rd standing for election every 2yrs... Recall all sitting members of the government.. elected and appointed subject to new elections and appointments... no one presently serving may ever serve in a pubic office again... the corruption is that bad.

Texas just released a statement today saying that it was "VOTER ERROR."

Yeah, right.

Of course it is voter error... anything but election and voter fraud... according to those who rely on voter and election fraud to be elected... the status quo.  We must not take their word for it and Donald Trump must not take the word of a corrupt political system, that the elections were properly supervised and reflect the will of the people. 

We all know that ELECTRONIC VOTING is CORRUPTED.... that private companies owned by George Soros's are tabulating our votes and providing CORRUPT software and hardware for our elections... a very, very, very questionable method to conduct elections.. We should not rely on private companies, some outside of the US, to tabulate our election results... especially since there is no paper audit trail. 

Touch Screen voting machines have no paper trail... In most of the States, where voter fraud is occurring, there is no way to prove voter fraud, as there is no paper trail, and the evidence of voter fraud is therefore sporadic, often antidotal and impeachable.  However, when lots of reports of the same antidotal incidents of fraud occur... there is legitimate reason to believe, where there is smoke there is a fire... fraud is occurring. 

We also find that election officials, up to and including the Secretary of State are part of the problem... openly complicit with what appears to be a system ripe for voter and election fraud. The Political apparatus for conducting elections has become overtly fraudulent... with all sorts of shenanigans being used to manage outcomes to predetermined ends... both major political parties seem to be involved in this corrupt process.

In fact, we already know with certainty that most voter registration lists are corrupted... full of illegally registered individuals... multiple registered individuals, multiple State registrations, invalid addresses, people to young to vote, those with no proof of US Citizenship, etc., etc.  These issues alone make it impossible to state that our elections are not full of fraud. 

Democrats prefer the Stalin voting method...It's not the votes that counts..it's who counts the votes...Your analysis is 100% right on.

That's why we need a system of checks and balances. You have to have voters go online to a reputable site and cast a second vote mirroring your vote. If the numbers are identical then the vote is correct. If it is not the same numbers for each state there has been some tampering with the votes. This system will work and could be easily set up if they really wanted to fix the fraud system we have now. 

It works in the same way the congress or senate. They take a vote from each one for all the citizens to see who voted for and against.

From an ex-programer.

what's to keep the second site's software from being corrupted as well? If it's available to everybody over shared circuits (internet) it's software is at least as susceptible to being altered as the 1st voting site.

..from a has-been corporate network guy

I'll answer your question by giving you another question. Have you bought anything over the internet? Who did you chose to buy from? Do you do your banking and pay bills using the internet? How many problems have you had in the transaction?

If you buy from ebay you are using their system of checks and balances. If you don't get the product they have a way of checking it and when it is found that you didn't receive it you were reimbursed. If they didn't have this ebay would not still be here. Same with PayPal and their checks and balances. It is not hard to secure as the criminal people are telling us.

How long has stock trading been going on over the internet and how many problems have popped up with their chosen stockbroker? The myth given about hacking is really a joke. I get a laugh every time I hear that Wikileaks has found more emails. They are getting emails from the suppliers not from hacking.

true about wikileaks.

and true about hacking's reputation. what i think you're discounting too much is any shared network's vulnerabilities. ..and then there's the air medium that's so popular these days - a total disregard for basic data security principles. If a hacker has interest in my ebay account or my bank account they can get there. No router/firewall is impenetrable if the desire is strong enough - and stealing votes inspires a whole lot of passion these days.

You're right about open networks because there are government imposed laws that force them to allow them to snoop at will. Your bank account is the same way. The government can seize your account at any time for any reason and the Bank is forced to comply!

Here are some easy encrypted codes... give it a try! These codes are old and what we have today would boggle your mind.


Paper ballots are the only sure fire way to end most of the voter and election fraud... Canada still uses paper ballots for that very reason.  Their election results are tallied internally ... not be contractors and are usually available the day after the election.  We surly can wait one day for verifiable, certified election results...  Return to paper ballots and end massive voter fraud..

You are correct if they don't get "misplaced" or "burnt in a fire" or just lost somehow. With any of the different voting ways you have to have honest people handling the whole operation from start to finish.

The old saying that idle hands is the devil's workshop is also true with many hands is the devil's workshop as well.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco


SICK: Anderson Cooper Says Demographic Decline Of White Americans Is “Exciting”

“It’s an exciting evolution.”

Embedded video

[Click To Watch]

CNN’s Anderson Cooper said during an interview with Univision anchor Jorge Ramos that he found the demographic decline of white people “exciting”.

“The idea that, you know, whites will not be the majority, I mean, that’s — it’s an exciting transformation of the country, it’s an exciting evolution and you know, progress of our country in many different ways,” said Cooper.

Ramos agreed that whites becoming a minority in America was inevitable and a positive development.

The Judge@V8POW

Anderson Cooper barely able to contain his excitement about Whites becoming a minority.

Not thrilled about being replaced in the country your ancestors founded: you're a "Supremacist"

Understand White People, you're already in a race war.

“There’s nothing really they can do against this incredible demographic revolution. And in 2044, everyone is going to be a minority,” he said.

The media has repeatedly asserted that even raising the “conspiracy theory” of “the great replacement” or the demographic decline of white people puts you on a par with mass shooters and terrorists.

However, it’s apparently completely fine to talk about the issue so long as you proclaim the demographic decline of whites to be a positive thing.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service