Progressives openly warring with American Conservatives

Make no mistake, the American people and our Constitution are under direct attack by the forces behind the push for the NWO. Since November 2016 that attack has been levied at the duly elected President Donald J. Trump, and through him to the American people who elected him. The ramrod personality behind this assault appears to be a Naturalized citizen with self admitted Nazi collaboration in his repertoire,one George Soros. The forces behind the move towards an Oligarchic design for a domineering 'New World Order' has been spoken of very fondly by Georgie. Seems America is destined to always have to defeat one George or another to be Free and self governed. 
>
The only thing I can see that is stopping the Government from revoking George Soros naturalized citizenship is his massive fortune and the convoluted way he donates to certain politicians to skew the government laws and regulations in his favor. Considering that George is quoted as saying "Destroying America will be the culmination of my life's work" I would venture to say he is and has been engaged in the violation of {18 USC § 2384 & § 2385 } Those being Seditious Conspiracy and Advocating the overthrow of Government respectively. Therefore George could legally be stripped of his Naturalized Citizenship by the Attorney General invoking and prosecuting him under (18 USC § 1481 -Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen;voluntary action;burden of proof;presumptions) or ( INA: ACT 349 - LOSS OF NATIONALITY BY NATIVE-BORN OR NATURALIZED CITIZEN Sec. 349. [8 U.S.C. 1481]  (7) (b) ) Being legally and duly stripped of citizenship he could then be fined and deported or simply turned over to any nation that has legal claims/international arrest warrants against him like Russia has issued.
>
 
>
The Main Stream Media is now highly biased against Traditional American Values to the point it has become nothing more than a Propaganda outlet to mis-shape the American consciousness into a pliable mass for the Future Dictatorial Oligarchists to mold to their benefit. In other and more correct words;to enslave the population for their profit. Consider this, 12 men/families now own 65%of the total of the worlds wealth. That does not satisfy them, they want it all, and they want every other human being to be their serfs. The world has seen this type of action before with self aggrandizing dictators like Napoleon, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini,Mao Zedong,Pol Pot, etc. All of whom started out by promising the people a better life, but having that inbred Satanic spark, ended up enslaving and murdering until their populations were too fearful to resist any new assault on their morals.
>
>
How many times will we let this pestilence and depravity take root to the point where we have to spill good and honorable blood to uproot it again and again?  Why have we not learned the repeating lessons from history? Are we such abject sheep that we blindly accept the spin and lies until it is too late to derail their course before bloodshed is necessary? We are seeing a massive culmination of the propagandizing of our children to believe the lies so thoroughly and blindly obey, they get physically ill and paranoid when anything criticizes or conflicts with the propaganda they have been indoctrinated with. Example; Since the commencement of the presidential election campaign, it started out with Trump being the butt of leftist commodian humor and has geometrically progressed to all out attempts to remove him from office under false pretenses.
>
It seems that no matter what President Trump does, it incurs the wrath of the Leftist Progressive Socialists who are alternately known as the Democratic Party. Even when Trump does something that party has been calling for since the campaign (removing FBI Director Comey for cause) they automatically reverse course and condemn him for it alluding that he has somehow broken a non existent law/tradition/protocol or whatever, or put spin on actions their golden boy Obama regularly did with no complaints (like ignoring the Law and the Constitutional requirements of his office).
>
The concerted effort from the Press/Democratic Judiciary/Democratic Party, and other Soros controlled groups have allied to push the Trump administration into a corner trying to force him to move left of what the majority of the Country wants or be removed from office. Lets face it, the Democratic Soros controlled factions in Congress have not even confirmed his Cabinet picks yet. This is unconscionable as it directly affects how Trump's administration does it's job. A job I might add that has been mandated by the majority of Americans. Trump has been relegated to instituting his agenda to "Drain and Clean the Swamp" by way of executive orders. That in itself is fodder for the Progressive/Socialist Propaganda machine to blame Trump for conditions they themselves setup as a road block to his administration.
>
Getting back to the debacle with Comey, the left has been haranguing Trump to "Pick someone they consider moderate" The current frontrunner is Joe Lieberman from Connecticut. This man by his voting record is not "Moderate" he is very Left. Joe is a staunch Gun Grabber and Anti-Second Amendment personage. Being head of the FBI he could do serious damage to our Second Amendment rights through 'Regulations'. Apparently the question of unpaid parking tickets will be departmentally construed as you being a "Fugitive from Justice" and strip you of your 2nd Amendment rights along with the confiscation of all your guns. The FBI on orders from it's head cop, could move to expand the NCIS system into a National Gun Registry. Doing that has consistently been the first move by governments to unilaterally confiscate ALL Civilian Firearms regardless of Constitutional Laws to the contrary. There is even a legitimate question if Trump were to remove the names of the 257,000 law-abiding veterans, placed on that list by orders of Obama using misrepresentation of the truth, would even comply with that legal order.
>
If you remember Lieberman gained that false label of 'Moderate' by revolting against Alt-Left Connecticut Democratic/Socialists when they tried to nominate someone else to his Senate seat. Strictly a self preservation move to maintain his power base and not to be a 'Moderate' in fact. Take a look at his cumulative record; Voted against Americans right to exercise their 2nd rights in parks, on trains,in DC,and supported the disastrous Gun Free Zones that got so many innocent people hurt or killed with no means of self defense, basically made them 'Sitting Ducks' to be shot as if they were in an arcade game, but with real world consequences. He supported failed Legislation to ban ALL private sales of firearms and cast the deciding vote against Concealed Carry Reciprocity. He has an "F" rating with gun advocate groups like Gun Owners of America. Lieberman has shown himself to be just as much a gun hater as Feinstein,Schumer, and the rest of the gun grabber ilk. As FBI director he can do tremendous damage to the 2nd amendment rights of American Citizens.
>
Right now the Republican Establishment is pushing Trump to appoint someone who would be immediately supported by Schumer, and be expedited through the Senate.This is exactly the wrong way to go. The hard left of middle Republicans like McCain want this to happen so they can claim a pyrrhic victory for the party despite the long term consequences. Remember, anyone acceptable to Schumer would be for gun control and anti-second amendment. Ant Schumer approved candidate would work against all conservative viewpoints and surreptitiously work to destroy the Trump administration and severely damage Republican House and Senate election prospects for 2018 and 2020.
>
We must remember the protection of our God given rights are in OUR HANDS not the Progressive/Liberal lackeys in  Government.
>

 

Views: 47

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 Good Morning, a new thread, for you to ponder on. a new discovery, a shinning star, a new era and a New World Order Can Emerge.  This is,please tell me how a 1000 year old Treaty has been used to rule the world, is this the truth, or was John Adams, our Founding Father of this country lying.

The Magan Carta has been instrumental, "serving as an instrument or means in pursuing an aim or policy", it was used in the Federal Reserve Act, this Treaty, forced into Constitutional Policies, it was created back around th1 1200AD's, there was a issue between the Pope Of The Roman Catholic Church and the King's Magna Carta, so a deal was formed, Rome would become a part of this Treaty, and the Roman Catholic Church would be allowed a percentage of the Tax, and a controlling factor, within the Banks.

 The Magna Carta, allowed the Treasury Departmental Policies to be changed to the Central Banks System, of the EU. The Federal Reserve, wrote in a IRS Policy,Of the UK, they are Tax free.

 The Magna Carta Nafta Policies, is by the UK....

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

ALERT ALERT

FBI Text Should Alarm Every American

Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, the reported FBI lovebirds, are the poster children for the next “Don’t Text and Investigate” public service ads airing soon at an FBI office near you.

Their extraordinary texting affair on their government phones has given the FBI a black eye, laying bare a raw political bias brought into the workplace that agents are supposed to check at the door when they strap on their guns and badges.

It is no longer in dispute that they held animus for Donald Trump, who was a subject of their Russia probe, or that they openly discussed using the powers of their office to “stop” Trumpfrom becoming president. The only question is whether any official acts they took in the Russia collusion probe were driven by those sentiments.

The Justice Department’s inspector general is endeavoring to answer that question.

For any American who wants an answer sooner, there are just five words, among the thousands of suggestive texts Page and Strzok exchanged, that you should read.

That passage was transmitted on May 19, 2017. “There’s no big there there,” Strzok texted.

The date of the text long has intrigued investigators: It is two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee an investigation into alleged collusion between Trump and the Russia campaign.

Since the text was turned over to Congress, investigators wondered whether it referred to the evidence against the Trump campaign.

This month, they finally got the chance to ask. Strzok declined to say — but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses.

The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was “there.”

By the time of the text and Mueller’s appointment, the FBI’s best counterintelligence agents had had plenty of time to dig. They knowingly used a dossier funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — which contained uncorroborated allegations — to persuade the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to issue a warrant to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page (no relation to Lisa Page).

They sat on Carter Page’s phones and emails for nearly six months without getting evidence that would warrant prosecuting him. The evidence they had gathered was deemed so weak that their boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, was forced to admit to Congress after being fired by Trump that the core allegation remained substantially uncorroborated.

In other words, they had a big nothing burger. And, based on that empty-calorie dish, Rosenstein authorized the buffet menu of a special prosecutor that has cost America millions of dollars and months of political strife.

The work product Strzok created to justify the collusion probe now has been shown to be inferior: A Clinton-hired contractor produced multiple documents accusing Trump of wrongdoing during the election; each was routed to the FBI through a different source or was used to seed news articles with similar allegations that further built an uncorroborated public narrative of Trump-Russia collusion. Most troubling, the FBI relied on at least one of those news stories to justify the FISA warrant against Carter Page.

That sort of multifaceted allegation machine, which can be traced back to a single source, is known in spy craft as “circular intelligence reporting,” and it’s the sort of bad product that professional spooks are trained to spot and reject.

But Team Strzok kept pushing it through the system, causing a major escalation of a probe for which, by his own words, he knew had “no big there there.”

The answer as to why a pro such as Strzok would take such action has become clearer, at least to congressional investigators. That clarity comes from the context of the other emails and text messages that surrounded the May 19, 2017, declaration.

It turns out that what Strzok and Lisa Page were really doing that day was debating whether they should stay with the FBI and try to rise through the ranks to the level of an assistant director (AD) or join Mueller’s special counsel team.

“Who gives a f*ck, one more AD like [redacted] or whoever?” Strzok wrote, weighing the merits of promotion, before apparently suggesting what would be a more attractive role: “An investigation leading to impeachment?”

Lisa Page apparently realized the conversation had gone too far and tried to reel it in. “We should stop having this conversation here,” she texted back, adding later it was important to examine “the different realistic outcomes of this case.”

A few minutes later Strzok texted his own handicap of the Russia evidence: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there.”

So the FBI agents who helped drive the Russia collusion narrative — as well as Rosenstein’s decision to appoint Mueller — apparently knew all along that the evidence was going to lead to “nothing” and, yet, they proceeded because they thought there was still a possibility of impeachment.

Impeachment is a political outcome. The only logical conclusion, then, that congressional investigators can make is that political bias led these agents to press an investigation forward to achieve the political outcome of impeachment, even though their professional training told them it had “no big there there.”

And that, by definition, is political bias in action.

How concerned you are by this conduct is almost certainly affected by your love or hatred for Trump. But put yourself for a second in the hot seat of an investigation by the same FBI cast of characters: You are under investigation for a crime the agents don’t think occurred, but the investigation still advances because the desired outcome is to get you fired from your job.

TEA PARTY TARGET

 Trump Poised To Take
 Control Of The Federal Reserve 

  • The Fed doesn’t stabilize markets and money — it does the opposite
  • President Trump sharply criticized the Federal Reserve this week, saying interest rate increases are hurting the economy.
  • Trump will have the opportunity to fashion the central bank in the image he would like as he has four vacancies to fill on the board of governors.
  • The result could be a more politicized Fed.

President Donald Trump has multiple reasons as to why he should take control of the Federal Reserve. He will do so both because he can and because his broader policies argue that he should do so. The president is anti-overregulating American industry. The Fed is a leader in pushing stringent regulation on the nation. By raising interest rates and stopping the growth in the money supply it stands in the way of further growth in the American economy.

First, He Can

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve is required to have seven members. It has three. Two of the current governors were put into their position by President Trump. Two more have been nominated by the president and are awaiting confirmation by the Senate. After these two are put on the Fed’s board, the president will then nominate two more to follow them. In essence, it is possible that six of the seven Board members will be put in place by Trump.

The Federal Open Market Committee has 12 members and sets the nation’s monetary policy. Seven of the 12 are the members of the Board of Governors. Five additional are Federal Reserve district bank presidents. Other than the head of the Fed bank in New York, who was nominated by the president, the other four can only take their positions as district bank presidents if the board in Washington agrees to their hiring. One of these, the Fed Bank president in Minneapolis, Neel Kashkari, is already arguing for no further rate increases.

Second, Regulation

Following the passage of the Dodd Frank Act in July 2010, the Fed was given enormous power to regulate the banking industry. It moved quickly to implement a number of new rules. The Fed set up a system that would penalize banks that failed to obey its new rules. These rules included setting limits as to how big an individual bank could be; how much money the banks had to invest in fed funds and Treasurys as a percent of their assets; which loans were desirable and which were not; where the banks had to obtain their funding and many, many, more up to and including how much a bank could pay its investors in dividends.

These rules have meaningfully slowed bank investments in the economy (the Volcker Rule) and they have had a crippling effect on bank lending in the housing markets (other agencies have had an impact here also).

Thus, of all of the government agencies the Fed has been possibly the most restrictive. The president has already moved to correct these excesses by putting in place a new Fed Governor (Randal Quarles) to regulate the banking industry.

Three, Killing Economic Growth

In the second quarter of 2018, the growth in non-seasonally adjusted money supply (M2) has been zero. That’s right, the money supply did not grow at all. This is because the Fed is shrinking its balance sheet ultimately by $50 billion per month. In addition, the Fed has raised interest rates seven times since Q4 2015. Supposedly there are five more rate increases coming.

This is the tightest monetary policy since Paul Volcker headed the institution in the mid-1980s. It will be recalled his policies led to back-to-back recessions. Current Fed monetary policy is directly in conflict with the president’s economic goals.

Moreover, the Treasury is estimating it will pay $415 billion in interest on the federal debt in this fiscal year. A better estimate might be $450 billion if rates keep going up. There are a lot of bridges and tunnels and jobs that could be created with this money.

Then there is inflation. It is likely to rise if the Fed eases its policies. If that happens paying down the federal debt becomes easier. On a less desirable note, higher interest rates lower real estate values. Lower rates that stimulate inflation increase real estate values.

Bottom Line

The president can and will take control of the Fed. It may be recalled when the law was written creating the Federal Reserve the secretary of the Treasury was designated as the head of the Federal Reserve. We are going to return to that era. Like it or not the Fed is about to be politicized.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service